Surreal illustration of cancer ribbons and blood vessels symbolizing cancer-related thrombosis.

Cancer Patients and Blood Clots: How Can We Improve Prevention?

"Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious risk for ambulatory cancer patients. Understand the current challenges and potential solutions for better prophylaxis."


Patients battling cancer face a significantly elevated risk of developing thromboembolic events, commonly known as blood clots. While often overlooked, these events can lead to severe complications that diminish a patient's overall quality of life. Although thromboprophylaxis, the prevention of blood clots, is a standard practice, its primary focus tends to be on patients admitted to hospitals for acute medical conditions or those undergoing major surgical procedures.

However, a considerable number of thrombotic events occur in ambulatory patients—those receiving outpatient care—where current guidelines typically do not recommend routine preventive measures. This gap in care underscores the need for a closer look at how we can better protect these vulnerable individuals.

This article explores the challenges and potential solutions for improving venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients. It dives into recent research, risk assessment models, and innovative approaches aimed at reducing the incidence of blood clots without increasing the risk of bleeding.

Why Are Cancer Patients at Higher Risk for Blood Clots?

Surreal illustration of cancer ribbons and blood vessels symbolizing cancer-related thrombosis.

Both venous and, to a lesser extent, arterial thrombosis are common complications in cancer patients, occurring during treatment and follow-up. Beyond patient-related factors and existing health issues, cancer itself and its treatments—including surgery and chemotherapy—significantly contribute to this increased risk.

The true incidence of VTE in cancer patients is likely underestimated due to its often silent nature. A recent study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink identified 6,592 active-cancer-associated VTEs among 112,738 cancer-associated person-years. The incidence rate of first VTE in patients with active cancer was 5.8 per 100 person-years.

  • Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) can lead to post-thrombotic syndrome, characterized by painful swelling and recurrent ulcers.
  • Pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, with higher rates among cancer patients.
  • Cancer patients who develop clots often require long-term anticoagulation, increasing their risk of bleeding complications and potentially disrupting chemotherapy schedules.
Moreover, studies consistently demonstrate that VTE negatively impacts survival rates in cancer patients. A Danish study revealed that the one-year survival rate for cancer patients with VTE was significantly lower compared to those without VTE (12% vs. 36%). Similar findings were echoed in a retrospective study involving neutropenic cancer patients in the United States.

Future Directions: Balancing Prevention and Risk

Despite considerable efforts to minimize thromboembolic events in cancer patients, VTE remains a concern, especially in ambulatory patients undergoing chemotherapy. A recent Cochrane review confirmed that VTE prophylaxis with LMWH significantly reduced symptomatic VTE in these patients. However, the potential for increased bleeding necessitates careful consideration before routine implementation.

Future research should focus on identifying targeted groups of cancer patients who would benefit most from thromboprophylaxis, considering their specific disease and treatment regimens. These studies should aim to improve the efficacy of anticoagulation while minimizing the risk of bleeding.

Ultimately, a more nuanced approach to VTE prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients is needed. By combining risk assessment models, targeted interventions, and ongoing research, healthcare professionals can better protect these vulnerable patients from the potentially devastating consequences of blood clots.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1007/s11239-017-1542-9, Alternate LINK

Title: Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis For Ambulatory Cancer Patients, Can We Do Better?

Subject: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Journal: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Authors: Hikmat Abdel-Razeq, Asem Mansour

Published: 2017-08-31

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are the primary reasons cancer patients are more prone to developing blood clots?

Cancer patients face a higher risk of developing blood clots due to several factors. The disease itself, along with treatments like surgery and chemotherapy, significantly contribute to this increased risk. These factors, combined with patient-related issues, elevate the likelihood of both venous and, to a lesser extent, arterial thrombosis.

2

How common is venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients, and what makes it challenging to determine the true incidence?

Venous thromboembolism or VTE, often goes unnoticed, making it difficult to accurately determine its prevalence in cancer patients. However, studies such as one using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, provide insight. This study identified a significant number of active-cancer-associated VTEs, highlighting the substantial risk faced by this population.

3

What are the potential complications of blood clots, such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), for cancer patients?

Deep vein thrombosis or DVT, can lead to post-thrombotic syndrome, causing painful swelling and recurrent ulcers. Pulmonary embolism or PE, is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, with higher rates among cancer patients. Furthermore, cancer patients who develop clots often require long-term anticoagulation, increasing their risk of bleeding complications and potentially disrupting chemotherapy schedules.

4

Why are ambulatory cancer patients particularly vulnerable to blood clots, and what gaps exist in current preventive care?

While thromboprophylaxis is a standard practice, it mainly focuses on patients in hospitals or those undergoing major surgery. However, many thrombotic events occur in ambulatory patients, those receiving outpatient care. Current guidelines typically do not recommend routine preventive measures for these individuals, creating a gap in care that needs addressing.

5

What do current studies suggest about preventing blood clots in ambulatory cancer patients, and what are the key considerations for future prevention strategies involving VTE prophylaxis with LMWH?

Recent studies and reviews, such as the Cochrane review, indicate that VTE prophylaxis with LMWH can significantly reduce symptomatic VTE in ambulatory cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, the potential for increased bleeding requires careful consideration before widespread implementation. Future strategies must balance the benefits of prevention with the risk of bleeding complications to optimize patient outcomes.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.