Symbolic image of the European Union undergoing transformative change, representing the concept of destituent power.

Can 'Destituent Power' Dismantle Democracy? Rethinking Protest Movements in the EU

"Exploring the limits of negativistic politics and whether disruptive strategies can truly reconstruct constitutional foundations."


In times of political and economic upheaval, radical ideas often take center stage. Since the euro crisis, the European Union has faced unprecedented challenges, leading to the rise of protest movements advocating for resistance and even partial disintegration. These groups argue that the EU has become a neoliberal force, stifling democracy and preventing progressive reforms. But can tearing down existing structures truly pave the way for something better?

This article explores the concept of 'destituent power'—the power to dismantle existing political orders—and examines whether such disruptive strategies can be defended as a democratic practice within the context of EU constitutional politics. We'll delve into the arguments surrounding this concept, considering its potential and its limitations.

We will navigate the emerging debate on destituent power, dissecting its various interpretations and assessing their feasibility. By understanding the nuances of this concept, we can better evaluate the claims of protest movements and determine whether their actions truly contribute to a more democratic and just European Union.

What is Destituent Power and How Does It Challenge Constitutional Politics?

Symbolic image of the European Union undergoing transformative change, representing the concept of destituent power.

The concept of destituent power suggests that opposition to, or withdrawal from, public authority can serve as a catalyst for constitutional change. It represents a form of political action that seeks to bypass the established regulatory framework, potentially rendering political institutions inoperative and dismantling existing constitutional orders.

However, destituent power is often framed within democratic theory, raising critical questions about when and how acts of contestation can be justified. It's a concept that captures both the desire to dismantle existing structures and the ambition to create something better, more democratic and inclusive.
  • Anti-Juridical Conception: This view rejects sovereignty and law outright, advocating for withdrawal from conventional constitutional order.
  • Juridical Conception: This approach acknowledges legitimacy problems within specific contexts, aiming for constitutional reordering. This is further divided into:
    • State Civil Disobedience: Destituent power is a limited form of non-legal opposition justified by the need to remedy legitimacy deficits.
    • Popular Sovereignty: Destituent power is an expression of the people's will, a dimension of constituent power.
To clarify, we need to consider whether movements for EU reform that focus on disrupting legal and traditional routes are compatible with anti-juridical views that promote self-governance separate to those systems. The goal of this analysis is to consider a democratic model for EU constitutional politics, reliant on strategies for political resistance and disintegration.

The Road Ahead: Balancing Disruption and Construction

Destituent power offers a valuable framework for understanding political strategies that challenge the status quo. It highlights the potential for contestation to drive meaningful change and address democratic deficits. However, it's crucial to recognize that destituent power is not a standalone solution. To achieve lasting and legitimate change, it must be coupled with a constructive vision for the future—one that empowers citizens and strengthens the foundations of democracy.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.