C-Section Rates in Kathmandu: Why Are They So High?
"A new study reveals alarmingly high cesarean section rates in Kathmandu, Nepal. What's driving this trend, and what can be done?"
Cesarean section rates (CSR) are a significant public health concern globally. Over the past few decades, there's been a notable increase in C-sections, raising questions about the factors contributing to this trend. A recent study conducted at Kathmandu Medical College in Nepal sheds light on the local landscape of C-section deliveries.
While increased access to gynecological and obstetrical care has improved institutional deliveries in many developing countries, the rate of cesarean sections in Nepal remains relatively low compared to some nations. However, hospital-based data suggests a rapid increase in C-section deliveries, particularly in certain regions.
This article delves into the findings of the Kathmandu Medical College study, examining the C-section rate and the primary reasons behind these surgical births in their specific setting. Understanding these factors is crucial for implementing targeted measures to address the rising CSR and mitigate potential associated problems.
Kathmandu's C-Section Profile: Key Findings
The study analyzed 1,172 deliveries at Kathmandu Medical College between June 2015 and January 2016. The overall cesarean section rate was a significant 45.81%. Here’s a breakdown of the key demographics and indications:
- Age: Most patients were between 25-29 years old (42.8%).
- Parity: A slight majority were first-time mothers (primigravida) at 51%.
- Type: Emergency C-sections accounted for 76.5% of cases, while elective C-sections were 23.4%. Multigravida patients (those with previous pregnancies) underwent elective procedures more often than primigravida patients (73.8% vs 25.39%).
Addressing High C-Section Rates: A Call to Action
The study's conclusion highlights a C-section rate significantly higher than the 10-15% recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The predominance of emergency C-sections, with previous cesarean births being a leading factor, warrants further investigation.
Several factors could contribute to this elevated rate. These include fear of litigation, increased use of electronic fetal monitoring (potentially leading to over-diagnosis of fetal distress), and a higher proportion of breech deliveries performed via C-section. Limited access to techniques like fetal scalp blood pH estimation (to confirm fetal distress) and external cephalic version (to turn breech babies) may also play a role.
Addressing the high C-section rate in Kathmandu requires a multi-pronged approach. This includes promoting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) when appropriate, refining fetal monitoring practices, exploring strategies to reduce failed inductions, and ensuring access to techniques that can minimize the need for surgical deliveries. By understanding the specific drivers in the local context, healthcare providers and policymakers can work together to optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes.