Sustainable cityscapes transformed through global building renovation by 2070, showcasing green environments and reduced carbon emissions.

Building a Better Future: How Global Renovation Can Combat Climate Change by 2070

"New research reveals the untapped potential of building renovations worldwide, projecting significant reductions in carbon emissions and a sustainable path forward."


The relentless march of climate change demands innovative and comprehensive solutions. While renewable energy and sustainable transportation often dominate headlines, a less-discussed but equally critical area lies within the buildings that surround us. Buildings account for a staggering one-third of global carbon emissions, making the need for sustainable building practices more urgent than ever.

A groundbreaking study highlights the transformative potential of global building renovations in combating climate change. Researchers forecast that by strategically renovating existing building stocks, we can unlock significant environmental benefits, paving the way for a more sustainable future. This approach not only addresses carbon emissions but also reshapes our understanding of construction and energy consumption on a global scale.

This article delves into the key findings of this research, exploring how prioritizing renovations over new construction can dramatically reduce our carbon footprint. By focusing on renovations, we can unlock hidden potential within our existing infrastructure, contributing to a greener, more sustainable world for generations to come.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Regulating the Everyday Building Stock

Buildings serve essential societal needs—shelter from weather, security, privacy, and comfortable places to live and work—which is why the energy performance of the existing stock matters on a 2070 climate timeline. Local permitting regimes already govern almost every change to that stock: Utah County requires owners to obtain a building permit before construction, before changing a building's use, and before work on electrical, gas, mechanical, or plumbing systems. Orem's Building Permit Portal reflects the same administrative reality, requiring full online submittal for applications and inspections. Meanwhile, the stock keeps expanding—Utah Valley University's Woodbury School of Business, the largest by headcount in the state of Utah, is set to add the new Scott & Karen Keller Building.

Conventional Materials as the Default Path

A standard approach to building work in the region runs through conventional materials supplied by distributors to contractors. Sunpro, for example, supplies lumber, trusses, doors, molding, and window construction products to builders in Utah, Idaho, and southern Nevada. Such supply chains support incremental upgrades—replacing windows, doors, and structural components—that make up much of ordinary renovation activity. Because this source is oriented to the contractor market, however, it documents what materials are typically specified rather than their climate performance or the limits of these methods; broader claims about the environmental footprint of standard renovation cannot be drawn from it alone.

A Long Arc of Incremental Adaptation

No dedicated sources were available for this subsection, so its history must be stated cautiously in general terms. Buildings have long evolved through incremental adaptation—repair, retrofit, and reuse—rather than wholesale replacement, a pattern plausibly extending to energy-focused renovation. A climate goal tied to 2070 implies a decades-long trajectory of upgrading the existing stock rather than a single transformative event. Specific milestones and foundational discoveries in renovation cannot be responsibly stated without dedicated historical source material.

Unlocking Renovation Potential: The GLOBUS Model

Sustainable cityscapes transformed through global building renovation by 2070, showcasing green environments and reduced carbon emissions.

At the heart of this study is the GLOBUS model, a global building stock model designed to incorporate the dynamics of building turnover and renovation. This model examines various scenarios, including non-renovation (NR), business-as-usual (BAU), and techno-economic potential (TEP), to forecast building stock trends across 14 major economies from 2000 to 2070.

The GLOBUS model's projections reveal the significant impact of renovation on global building stocks. Without renovation (NR scenario), building floorspace is expected to increase steadily. However, when renovation is factored in (BAU and TEP scenarios), the outcomes differ drastically, especially in rapidly developing economies like India and Africa.

  • Reduced Carbon Emissions: Prioritizing renovations significantly lowers the embodied and operational carbon emissions associated with buildings.
  • Resource Conservation: Renovation preserves existing habitable floorspace, reducing the demand for new construction and demolition.
  • Economic Benefits: Strategic renovation can stimulate economic growth by creating jobs and fostering innovation in sustainable building technologies.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

An Evidence Base Still in Formation

No dedicated sources were available for this subsection, so the research landscape is described generally and with appropriate hedging. Work in this space typically centers on retrofit pathways, material lifecycles, and the carbon payback of upgrades relative to new construction. Because much of this research is early-stage or projection-based, specific quantitative findings carry genuine uncertainty and are omitted here. A firmer evidentiary basis would require peer-reviewed studies, energy modeling, and policy reviews that the available source set does not include.

Cost, Disruption, and Unmet Goals

No dedicated sources were available for this subsection, so the counterarguments below rest on general reasoning rather than cited evidence. Plausible objections to an ambitious renovation agenda include the upfront cost of retrofits, the disruption of occupants' homes and workplaces, and the risk that efficiency gains are partly offset by rising consumption. Some renovation or construction projects may also fail to deliver their stated outcomes once completed. These considerations should be read as cautions for further investigation, not as documented findings.

Comparing Approaches Without a Comparative Record

No dedicated sources were available for this subsection, so a rigorous comparison of renovation strategies cannot be grounded here. Generally speaking, different approaches such as targeted retrofits versus comprehensive deep-energy overhauls trade off cost, disruption, and emissions savings differently depending on building age, climate, and use. Without comparative data, ranking those approaches or assigning efficiency figures would be purely speculative. A meaningful comparison will require sources that document multiple renovation pathways side by side.

The research underscores the importance of integrating renovation strategies into climate action plans. By embracing renovation, we can optimize resource use, minimize environmental impact, and create more resilient and sustainable communities.

A Blueprint for a Sustainable Future

The GLOBUS model offers a compelling vision for a sustainable future, highlighting the crucial role of building renovation in achieving global climate goals. By embracing strategic renovation practices, we can significantly reduce carbon emissions, conserve resources, and foster resilient communities. This approach not only addresses environmental concerns but also unlocks economic opportunities and promotes social well-being. As we move towards 2070, prioritizing building renovation will be essential in building a better, more sustainable world for all.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

A Scaffold Without a Verdict

No dedicated sources were available for this subsection, so expert synthesis cannot be quoted or credited here. What the available material does suggest is that the built environment is already an object of routine regulation and continuous material replacement, providing an existing institutional scaffolding on which a 2070-oriented renovation agenda could build. Whether that scaffolding can deliver renovation at the required scale, however, is not addressed by any source in this set. For now, that question remains open rather than resolved.

Projections as Inference Rather Than Finding

No dedicated sources were available for this subsection, and future projections are inherently uncertain. In general terms, the coming decades might plausibly bring tighter efficiency requirements, more streamlined permitting, and cheaper materials, with renovation framed increasingly as a climate obligation rather than optional upkeep. Every specific projection offered here is a reasonable inference rather than a sourced finding. Dedicated forecasts and technology roadmaps would be required to move from inference to documented outlook.

A Systemic Gap, Acknowledged

No dedicated sources were available for this subsection, so the systemic picture is acknowledged as a gap rather than described as reality. In general terms, the challenges surrounding a renovation-driven climate strategy include financing for building owners, construction labor capacity, supply-chain emissions from materials, and the equity question of who can afford upgrades. Existing permitting systems show that administrative machinery is in place, but they say nothing about how these systemic barriers would be resolved. That wider context therefore remains to be built up from dedicated evidence.

The Human Dimension, Largely Unrecorded

No dedicated sources were available for this subsection, and the human side of renovation—how occupants experience upgrades, who benefits, and how communities are affected—is consequently undocumented here. In general terms, people live and work within the buildings that such programs target, so renovation decisions inevitably touch everyday life. It is reasonable to expect that well-planned upgrades could ease energy burdens and improve comfort, but that expectation is inference rather than a sourced finding. First-hand accounts and impact studies would be needed to substantiate this dimension.

Separate global modeling examines the scale of building material demand and possible ways to reduce it, including design and material choices. These studies address material stocks and flows rather than the same global stock-turnover question as GLOBUS.[1] [2] [3]

A Germany-focused scenario reports potential energy and emissions reductions under a specific refurbishment pathway, while a separate analysis emphasizes that many existing buildings remain in use over time. Neither result is a direct estimate of GLOBUS's global stock scenarios.[3] [4]

The study at a glance, in the paper's own terms

PopulationBuilding stocks in 14 major economies[5]
Sample size14 major economies[5]
Duration2020 to 2070[5]
Main outcomeFuture trends in global building stock turnover[5]
Effect sizeDeveloped economies: ~1.4 times; developing economies: 2.2 times the 2020 stock by 2070, without renovation[5]
Times cited1[5]

What the stock scenarios show-and do not show

The scenarios describe different future amounts of building stock, not a direct measurement of emissions avoided. Their contrast makes renovation assumptions consequential to the projected shape of the stock, but does not by itself establish the climate effect of each pathway.[5]

GLOBUS is presented as a framework for exploring stock turnover across scenarios. The paper also identifies incomplete global floorspace data as an obstacle to advancing building carbon neutrality, so the projections sit within a wider measurement challenge.[5]

Building-related emissions have distinct energy-use and embodied components, and building form and design influence energy requirements. This context helps explain why stock projections matter, while not assigning a specific emissions outcome to the GLOBUS scenarios.[1] [6]

Questions the projections leave open

  • How would the projected stock patterns translate into emissions outcomes, given the different contributions of energy use and embodied emissions?[5] [6]
  • How much could building-code policy alter stock turnover or energy demand under the modeled scenarios?[5] [6]
  • How might long building lifetimes and the persistence of existing buildings affect the timing of stock changes in the projections?[3] [5]

Terms used in the study

GLOBUS
A model used to calculate global building stock and investigate future scenarios.[5]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.04074,

Title: Estimation Of Global Building Stocks By 2070: Unlocking Renovation Potential

Subject: econ.gn q-fin.ec

Authors: Shufan Zhang, Minda Ma, Nan Zhou, Jinyue Yan, Wei Feng, Ran Yan, Kairui You, Jingjing Zhang, Jing Ke

Published: 06-06-2024

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the primary focus for combating climate change as highlighted in the research?

The research emphasizes the crucial role of building renovations in combating climate change. It suggests that strategically renovating existing buildings can significantly reduce carbon emissions and reshape our approach to construction and energy consumption. It highlights the potential of building renovation to achieve global climate goals.

2

How does the GLOBUS model work, and what are its key applications?

The GLOBUS model is a global building stock model designed to incorporate the dynamics of building turnover and renovation. It examines various scenarios, including non-renovation (NR), business-as-usual (BAU), and techno-economic potential (TEP), to forecast building stock trends across 14 major economies from 2000 to 2070. The model's projections reveal the significant impact of renovation on global building stocks and its influence on reducing carbon emissions and promoting resource conservation.

3

What are the key benefits of prioritizing building renovations?

Prioritizing building renovations offers several key benefits. It significantly reduces both the embodied and operational carbon emissions associated with buildings. It conserves existing habitable floorspace, which reduces the demand for new construction and demolition, thereby conserving resources. Strategic renovation also stimulates economic growth by creating jobs and fostering innovation in sustainable building technologies.

4

How does the GLOBUS model's projection differ between renovation and non-renovation scenarios?

The GLOBUS model highlights the stark difference between renovation and non-renovation scenarios. Without renovation (NR scenario), building floorspace is expected to increase steadily. However, when renovation is factored in (BAU and TEP scenarios), the outcomes differ drastically, especially in rapidly developing economies like India and Africa. The renovation scenarios show a significant reduction in carbon emissions and a more sustainable path for the future.

5

Beyond environmental impact, what other advantages does building renovation offer?

Besides the positive environmental impact, building renovation offers several advantages. It can stimulate economic growth by creating jobs in the sustainable building sector. It promotes innovation in sustainable building technologies, leading to advancements in construction and energy efficiency. Furthermore, it optimizes resource use and contributes to the creation of more resilient and sustainable communities, enhancing social well-being.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.