Futuristic surgical scene showcasing VATS lobectomy with robotic assistance and data visualization.

Breathe Easier: How VATS Lobectomy is Changing Lung Cancer Surgery Outcomes

Author's portrait.
Mira Elwood in Health & Wellness July 2025 • 4 min read.

"Discover how minimally invasive techniques are improving recovery and mortality rates in lung cancer treatment, especially in smaller hospitals."


Lung cancer surgery has undergone significant changes, especially with the rise of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. Traditionally, assessing the impact of surgical techniques has been challenging because hospital size and resources vary greatly. Recent research seeks to provide a clearer picture of how these factors influence patient outcomes.

A study focused on patients undergoing lobectomy, a surgical procedure to remove one or more lobes of the lung, between 2008 and 2014. The researchers analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample to understand national trends and in-hospital outcomes. Surgeries were categorized as either open or VATS, and hospitals were grouped by size (small, medium, large) to see how these factors affected results.

This article breaks down the findings of this research, explaining how VATS lobectomy is becoming more common, particularly in smaller hospitals, and its impact on patient mortality rates. We'll also look at how standardizing care through protocols can lead to better outcomes and improved value in cardiac surgery, offering insights relevant to anyone interested in the advancements in surgical care.

The Rise of VATS Lobectomy: A National Trend

Futuristic surgical scene showcasing VATS lobectomy with robotic assistance and data visualization.

The study revealed some interesting trends in how lung cancer surgeries are performed across the United States. A total of 202,668 lobectomies were analyzed, with a significant portion—71,638 (35%)—performed using VATS. The remaining 131,030 (65%) were open surgeries.

While the total number of lobectomies decreased slightly over the study period (from 30,058 in 2008 to 27,340 in 2014), the proportion of VATS procedures increased dramatically. Specifically, VATS lobectomies rose from 24.0% to 46.9%, while open lobectomies decreased from 76.0% to 53.0%. This shift indicates a growing adoption of minimally invasive techniques.

  • Increased VATS Penetration: VATS lobectomy has seen increased acceptance across hospitals, especially in smaller institutions.
  • Decreasing Open Surgeries: The proportion of traditional open lobectomies is declining as more hospitals adopt VATS techniques.
  • Mortality Rates: VATS procedures have consistently shown mortality rates comparable to or better than those of open surgeries.
When the data was broken down by hospital size, it was found that small hospitals initially performed more open lobectomies. However, even these hospitals showed a trend toward increased VATS lobectomies over time. Importantly, the annual mortality rates for VATS (ranging from 1.0% to 1.9%) and open surgeries (1.9% to 2.4%) did not significantly differ over time, but mortality rates decreased significantly in smaller hospitals (p<0.01). This suggests that smaller hospitals are improving their outcomes, potentially due to increased experience with VATS or other factors.

Standardizing Care: The Impact of Protocols on Cardiac Surgery Outcomes

Beyond the trends in lung cancer surgery, another study highlights the importance of standardized protocols in improving patient outcomes. This research focused on implementing a computer-based insulin infusion algorithm and diabetes consult service in cardiac surgery. The goal was to improve glycemic control and reduce complications.

The study compared patients before and after the implementation of the new protocol. The results showed that the average daily-weighted mean glucose (DWM) decreased, and there were fewer hyperglycemic events. Importantly, the risk-adjusted analyses showed decreases in DWM glucose, hyperglycemic events, and overall morbidity.

These findings underscore the value of standardizing care through evidence-based protocols. Whether it's adopting minimally invasive surgical techniques like VATS or implementing glucose management systems, hospitals can significantly improve patient outcomes and enhance the value of healthcare delivery.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What exactly is VATS lobectomy, and how does it differ from traditional lung cancer surgery?

VATS lobectomy, or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, is a minimally invasive surgical technique used to remove one or more lobes of the lung. It involves making small incisions in the chest to insert a camera and surgical instruments, allowing surgeons to perform the procedure without a large incision. This approach has been shown to improve recovery times and patient outcomes compared to traditional open surgery.

2

What trends have been observed in the use of VATS lobectomy versus open surgery for lung cancer in recent years?

The research indicates a significant shift toward VATS lobectomy (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy) across hospitals in the United States between 2008 and 2014. While the total number of lobectomies decreased slightly, the proportion of VATS procedures increased dramatically, particularly in smaller hospitals. This suggests a growing acceptance and adoption of minimally invasive techniques for lung cancer surgery.

3

How do the mortality rates of VATS lobectomy compare to those of open surgery, especially in smaller hospitals?

The study found that mortality rates for VATS lobectomy (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy) and open surgeries were comparable. However, mortality rates decreased significantly in smaller hospitals, suggesting improvements in outcomes. While the annual mortality rates for VATS ranged from 1.0% to 1.9%, and open surgeries ranged from 1.9% to 2.4%, this decrease in smaller hospitals could be attributed to increased experience with VATS or other factors such as standardized care protocols.

4

Besides surgical techniques, how do standardized care protocols impact patient outcomes in surgery?

The standardization of care protocols, such as implementing a computer-based insulin infusion algorithm and diabetes consult service, can significantly improve patient outcomes in cardiac surgery. These protocols help manage glycemic control, reduce complications, and enhance the overall value of surgical care. While the study focuses on cardiac surgery, the principles of standardized protocols can be applied to lung cancer surgery and VATS lobectomy (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy) to improve patient outcomes.

5

What are the broader implications of increasing VATS lobectomy and standardized care for lung cancer treatment and healthcare systems?

The shift towards VATS lobectomy (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy) is not just a trend but has profound implications for patient care and hospital practices. The adoption of minimally invasive techniques requires investment in training and equipment, but the benefits of reduced recovery times, lower mortality rates, and improved outcomes make it a worthwhile endeavor. Additionally, standardizing care through protocols can further enhance the value and effectiveness of surgical interventions, leading to better patient experiences and cost savings for healthcare systems. As more hospitals embrace these advancements, we can expect to see continued improvements in lung cancer surgery outcomes and overall surgical care.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.