Conceptual illustration symbolizing the complexities of impaired control in alcohol use disorder.

Breaking the Cycle: Understanding and Addressing Loss of Control with Alcohol

"A new human laboratory model offers insights into the subjective experiences that drive impaired control, paving the way for earlier and more effective interventions."


For many, the journey into alcohol use disorder begins with a subtle shift: the occasional struggle to stick to planned limits. This experience, known as impaired control (IC), is characterized by using alcohol in larger amounts or for longer periods than intended, coupled with a persistent difficulty in cutting down or stopping altogether. It's a core feature of alcohol dependence, and catching it early could be key to preventing more severe problems.

However, research into impaired control has traditionally relied heavily on self-reporting, which can be influenced by recall biases and may not fully capture the objective behaviors associated with the condition. To address these limitations, researchers are exploring innovative methods to study IC in a more controlled and objective environment. One such approach involves the use of intravenous (IV) alcohol self-administration, a technique that allows for precise monitoring and regulation of blood alcohol levels.

Now, a recent study published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology has taken a significant step forward by applying IV alcohol self-administration to develop a novel human laboratory model of impaired control. This model offers a unique opportunity to investigate the subjective and behavioral processes that contribute to IC, potentially leading to new strategies for early intervention and prevention.

Inside the Lab: How the Impaired Control Model Works

Conceptual illustration symbolizing the complexities of impaired control in alcohol use disorder.

The study, led by Jeffrey D. Wardell and colleagues, involved young adults who reported heavy episodic drinking. Participants engaged in a two-hour IV alcohol self-administration session where they had the opportunity to control their blood alcohol concentration (BrAC). However, there was a catch: they were incentivized to maintain their BrAC below 80 mg%, a level often associated with impaired driving.

The researchers defined impaired control based on two factors:

  • Whether participants exceeded the BrAC limit (IC+) or adhered to it (IC-).
  • The discrepancy between their intended peak BrAC and their actual peak BrAC.
By analyzing these objective measures alongside subjective experiences reported by the participants, the researchers were able to gain valuable insights into the dynamics of impaired control. For instance, they found that individuals who exceeded the BrAC limit (IC+) tended to underestimate their peak BrAC, suggesting a disconnect between their perception of intoxication and their actual state.

The Road Ahead: Implications for Treatment and Prevention

This innovative laboratory model represents a promising avenue for advancing our understanding of impaired control and, ultimately, developing more effective interventions for alcohol use disorder. By combining objective measures of alcohol self-administration with subjective reports of craving, stimulation, and sedation, researchers can gain a more complete picture of the factors that contribute to the loss of control.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is impaired control in the context of alcohol use?

Impaired control (IC) in the context of alcohol use refers to the experience of using alcohol in larger amounts or for longer periods than initially intended, accompanied by a persistent difficulty in reducing or stopping its consumption. It's a key characteristic of alcohol dependence, and early detection is crucial for preventing more severe problems. The recent study uses IV alcohol self-administration, which allows for precise monitoring and regulation of blood alcohol levels.

2

Why is the new human laboratory model of impaired control important?

The innovative human laboratory model of impaired control, particularly when using IV alcohol self-administration, is important because it allows researchers to study the objective behaviors associated with impaired control in a controlled environment. Traditional research often relies on self-reporting, which can be subjective and influenced by biases. This model offers a more objective approach by monitoring blood alcohol concentration (BrAC) and comparing it to the individual's intended levels. This provides valuable insights into the factors contributing to loss of control.

3

How did the study define and measure impaired control?

The study defined impaired control (IC) based on two key factors: whether participants exceeded a pre-set blood alcohol concentration (BrAC) limit and the discrepancy between their intended peak BrAC and their actual peak BrAC. Participants were incentivized to maintain their BrAC below 80 mg%. By analyzing these measures alongside subjective experiences, researchers could differentiate between individuals exhibiting impaired control (IC+) and those adhering to the limit (IC-).

4

What did the study find regarding the perception of intoxication in individuals with impaired control?

The findings revealed a disconnect between perception and reality in individuals with impaired control (IC+). Those who exceeded the BrAC limit tended to underestimate their peak BrAC. This suggests a lack of awareness or misjudgment of their level of intoxication, which contributes to their inability to control their alcohol consumption. This information is crucial for developing targeted interventions that address this misperception.

5

What are the implications of this research for the treatment and prevention of alcohol use disorder?

This research has significant implications for the treatment and prevention of alcohol use disorder. By providing a more complete picture of the factors contributing to impaired control, including objective measures and subjective reports of craving, stimulation, and sedation, researchers can develop more effective interventions. This model can also be used to identify individuals at risk of developing alcohol use disorder early on, allowing for timely intervention and prevention efforts.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.