Balancing Act: How Workplace Breastfeeding Support Boosts Female Labor Force Participation
"Discover the surprising link between breastfeeding legislation and women's economic empowerment in the United States."
For decades, economists have explored the delicate balance between family life and career aspirations, particularly for women. This exploration has highlighted the importance of family-friendly workplace policies, especially parental leave and flexible work arrangements. However, one crucial aspect often overlooked is the impact of workplace breastfeeding accommodations on female labor force participation (FLFP). While the United States may lag behind other developed nations in certain parental benefits, innovative policies like state legislation mandating breastfeeding amenities are reshaping the landscape for working mothers.
The interplay between breastfeeding and employment is a complex dance, where a mother's time becomes a valuable commodity. The act of breastfeeding, while nurturing, directly competes with work hours, potentially impacting a mother's income and professional development. A recent study showed that women who breastfeed can spend a significant portion of their week doing so, leading to reduced income and a slower rate of acquiring human capital.
Recognizing the need to support working mothers, many states have introduced legislation requiring employers to provide breastfeeding amenities. This begs the question, do these initiatives make a significant impact on female labor force participation? This is a gap in the research that this article addresses. By analyzing the impact of state-level breastfeeding laws, this article uncovers the potential benefits and complexities of integrating motherhood and career.
The Lactation Legislation Effect: Unpacking the Numbers

Using data from the American Community Survey (ACS) and the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), the research reveals a compelling trend: workplace breastfeeding legislation positively influences female labor force participation. In states with such laws, women are more likely to remain or rejoin the workforce. The likelihood of female labor force participation (FLFP) increases across both datasets and multiple specifications, by at least 1.5 percentage points. The impact, however, isn't uniform; it varies across datasets, underscoring the complexity of this issue.
- ACS Data: Shows a gradual increase in FLFP, becoming significant about six years after the law's implementation, suggesting a prolonged but mild effect.
- PSID Data: Indicates a more immediate impact, with a notable increase in FLFP in the second year after the law is passed. However, this effect tends to diminish over time.
- CDC's Infant Feeding Practices Survey (IFPS): Results suggest a 2.2 percentage-point increase in the likelihood of returning to work after birth in states with breastfeeding legislation.
Beyond the Numbers: Implications and Future Directions
While the study provides compelling evidence of the positive impact of workplace breastfeeding legislation, it also uncovers complexities and potential unintended consequences. For example, the research suggests a possible spillover effect, where women without young children may experience reduced labor force participation due to the legislation. This could be due to increased costs for employers, shifting workplace dynamics, or other unforeseen factors. Further research is needed to fully understand and address these challenges. Despite these nuances, the study underscores the importance of policies that support working mothers and promote gender equity in the workplace.