Physician caught in a web of labels, representing the challenges of broad impairment descriptions.

Are You Really Impaired? How State Physician Health Programs Might Be Too Broad

Beau Callahan in Health & Wellness December 2025 • 4 min read.

"A new study questions the broad descriptions used by state physician health programs, raising concerns about potential mislabeling and inappropriate targeting."

In the high-stakes world of healthcare, ensuring that physicians are fit to practice is paramount. State physician health programs (PHPs) play a crucial role, tasked with identifying and assisting doctors who may be struggling with physical, mental, or substance use disorders. These programs aim to protect patients and support physicians in need.

However, a recent study raises a critical question: Are the descriptions of impairment used by some PHPs too broad? The research, published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, suggests that the criteria for identifying potentially impaired physicians might be so wide-ranging that they could apply to a significant portion of the general population.

This article explores the findings of this study, delving into the potential implications of overly broad impairment descriptions. We'll examine how these descriptions could lead to mislabeling, create unnecessary stigma, and potentially discourage physicians from seeking help when they need it most. Understanding the nuances of this issue is essential for fostering a fair and supportive healthcare environment.

The Broad Net of Impairment: Study Highlights Overly Inclusive Descriptions

Physician caught in a web of labels, representing the challenges of broad impairment descriptions.

The study, led by Nicholas D. Lawson and J. Wesley Boyd, investigated whether the descriptions of physician impairment used by PHPs in 23 states were so broad that almost anyone could potentially be suspected of being impaired.

Researchers randomly selected 25 descriptions of impairment from PHP websites and presented them anonymously online to a general population sample (N = 199) recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Participants were divided into two groups: one received narrowly worded versions of the descriptions, while the other received broadly worded versions.

Narrowly Worded Version: 70.9% of respondents endorsed at least one description of impairment, and 59.2% endorsed more than one.
Broadly Worded Version: A staggering 96.9% endorsed at least one description, with 95.8% endorsing multiple descriptions. Participants endorsed a median of 10 out of 25 (40%) descriptions.

These results indicate a significant issue: When impairment descriptions are framed broadly, a vast majority of people identify with at least one, and often many, of the listed characteristics. This raises concerns about the specificity and validity of these descriptions in accurately identifying physicians who are truly impaired and pose a risk to themselves or others.

Moving Forward: Towards Fairer and More Effective Physician Health Programs

The findings of this study serve as a call to action for PHPs, medical boards, and policymakers. Overly broad descriptions of impairment can lead to mislabeling, stigma, and unwarranted interventions, potentially deterring physicians from seeking help and undermining the integrity of the healthcare system. By refining impairment descriptions, ensuring fair evaluation processes, and promoting a supportive environment, we can better protect both patients and the well-being of our physicians.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What are Physician Health Programs (PHPs), and what is their primary function?

Physician Health Programs (PHPs) are state-run entities designed to identify and assist physicians who may be struggling with physical, mental, or substance use disorders. Their primary function is to protect patients and support physicians in need by ensuring they are fit to practice. By addressing issues affecting a physician's ability to provide safe and effective care, PHPs aim to maintain the integrity of the healthcare system. However, there are concerns that the definitions of impairment used by PHPs are too broad.

What are the main concerns raised about the broad descriptions of impairment used by some Physician Health Programs (PHPs)?

The broad descriptions of impairment used by some Physician Health Programs (PHPs) raise several concerns. These include the potential for mislabeling physicians who are not actually impaired, creating unnecessary stigma for those who are labeled, and discouraging physicians from seeking help when they need it most, fearing they might be unfairly targeted. If the criteria are too wide-ranging, they might apply to a significant portion of the general population, undermining the accuracy and fairness of the evaluation process. This can lead to unwarranted interventions and damage the integrity of the healthcare system.

What was the methodology used in the study by Nicholas D. Lawson and J. Wesley Boyd to assess the breadth of impairment descriptions used by PHPs?

In the study conducted by Nicholas D. Lawson and J. Wesley Boyd, researchers selected 25 descriptions of impairment from Physician Health Programs (PHP) websites in 23 states. They then presented these descriptions anonymously online to a general population sample recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Participants were divided into two groups, one receiving narrowly worded versions of the descriptions and the other receiving broadly worded versions, to compare how many people identified with each type of description. The percentage of respondents endorsing the descriptions were compared between the two groups.

According to the study, how did the endorsement rates of impairment descriptions differ between the narrowly worded and broadly worded versions presented to participants?

The study revealed a significant difference in endorsement rates between the two versions of impairment descriptions. In the group that received narrowly worded versions, 70.9% of respondents endorsed at least one description of impairment, and 59.2% endorsed more than one. In contrast, a staggering 96.9% of respondents in the group that received broadly worded versions endorsed at least one description, with 95.8% endorsing multiple descriptions. Participants in this group endorsed a median of 10 out of 25 (40%) descriptions. This stark difference highlights how broadly worded descriptions can lead a vast majority of people to identify with at least one, and often many, of the listed characteristics.

What steps can be taken to improve Physician Health Programs (PHPs) and ensure they are both fair and effective in supporting physicians and protecting patients?

To improve Physician Health Programs (PHPs), several steps can be taken. Firstly, refining impairment descriptions to be more specific and less open to broad interpretation is crucial. Secondly, ensuring fair and unbiased evaluation processes can prevent mislabeling and unwarranted interventions. This includes providing clear guidelines and standards for assessment. Furthermore, promoting a supportive environment that encourages physicians to seek help without fear of stigma or unfair targeting is essential. This involves educating healthcare professionals about the purpose of PHPs and fostering a culture of understanding and support. Finally, collaboration between PHPs, medical boards, and policymakers can help create comprehensive and effective strategies that protect both patients and the well-being of physicians. By implementing these measures, the integrity of the healthcare system can be upheld while providing necessary support to physicians in need.