Optimized fishing trawl net

Angle It Right: How a Bevel Can Boost Fishing Gear Efficiency

"Unlock the secrets to optimizing trawl otter-boards with the right bevel angle for enhanced hydrodynamic performance and reduced energy costs."


In the world of commercial fishing, trawl doors (or otter-boards) are essential for spreading the trawl net and maximizing the catch. These seemingly simple devices are subject to complex hydrodynamic forces, and even small improvements in their design can lead to significant gains in efficiency and reduced fuel consumption.

Researchers are constantly seeking ways to optimize otter-board design. Early studies date back to the 1980s, and ongoing research aims to meet the increasing demands of offshore fishing. One promising area of investigation is the effect of bevel angles on the hydrodynamic performance of three-layer parallel plate otter-boards.

This article dives into a detailed study that analyzes how different bevel angles impact the lift, drag, stability, and overall efficiency of these specialized otter-boards. We'll break down the key findings and explain how this knowledge can be applied to improve trawl fishing practices.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Measuring Trawling Efficiency

Trawling is described as a widely practiced but energy-intensive fishing method in India, with otter boards used to support fuel efficiency, catch rates, and economic performance. These boards generate hydrodynamic lift that spreads the net and keeps it open, linking their performance to fishing efficiency and economic effectiveness. A 2025 comparative study assessed fuel consumption, net opening, and catch efficiency under standardized trawling conditions, while a SEAFDEC study evaluated V-shaped otter boards during trawl operations.

Balancing Lift and Drag

A conventional approach is to use otter boards to spread the trawl net and keep its mouth open during fishing. The effectiveness of this method depends on how the boards interact with water flow, including the lift and resistance created during operation. Because trawling can be energy-intensive, changing board geometry or angle may involve trade-offs among net opening, stability, fuel use, and catch performance.

From Otter Boards to Trawl Doors

Otter boards exploit a shearing effect when positioned at an oblique angle to the current. The otter trawl appeared around 1860 as recreational tackle and later became a principal commercial bottom-fishing gear. Commercial viability expanded with steam-powered trawlers in the 1880s and 1890s; the sources identify James Robert Scott's patented iron otter boards in 1894 and describe otter trawls as more efficient than beam trawls for round fish.

Finding the Perfect Angle: Bevel Design and Hydrodynamic Performance

Optimized fishing trawl net

The study focused on otter-board models featuring three parallel plates, each with a distinct bevel angle. Researchers tested four different bevel angles (8°, 10°, 12°, and 14°) in a wind tunnel at a consistent wind speed of 28 m/s. They then meticulously measured several key performance indicators:

These parameters were used to assess the hydrodynamic performance of each model. The ultimate goal was to identify the bevel angle that provided the best balance of lift, drag, and stability.

  • Drag coefficient (Cx)
  • Lift coefficient (Cy)
  • Pitch moment coefficient (Cm)
  • Center of pressure coefficient (Cp)
  • Lift-drag ratio (Cy/Cx)
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Research-Driven Board Design

Recent research continues to examine otter boards as a route to improving trawling efficiency in India and elsewhere. A 2025 study conducted by the ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education focused on otter boards in an energy-intensive Indian trawling context. A 2026 computational study examined the dynamic response of trawl otter boards, with results intended to help identify design limitations and optimize board selection and sizing under different operating conditions. Research on Chinese trawl fisheries likewise describes otter boards as essential for maintaining the horizontal expansion of the net mouth.

Design Trade-Offs

A bevel or altered board geometry should not be treated as a guaranteed improvement in every fishing situation. Performance can vary with operating conditions, and changes intended to increase lift may also affect drag, stability, net opening, or fuel consumption. In practice, designs therefore require testing under representative conditions rather than relying on angle alone.

Drag Makes Configuration Critical

Comparative research on three conventional penaeid-trawl otter boards found that the boards can contribute up to approximately 56% of total system drag. That finding makes board configuration a major consideration in the fuel efficiency of penaeid-trawl systems. The study consequently reaffirmed that selecting and configuring otter boards appropriately is essential for maximizing efficiency.

The results revealed that a 12-degree bevel angle achieved the highest lift coefficient and lift-drag ratio. Specifically, the maximum lift coefficient was 2.598 at an angle of attack of 65°, and the maximum lift-drag ratio was 2.607 at an angle of attack of 37.5°. For stability, the 8-degree bevel angle demonstrated superior performance, with an absolute Cm value of 0.174 and a Cp variation coefficient of just 4.37%.

The Future of Trawl Design: Stability, Efficiency, and Refined Otter-Boards

This research demonstrates the significant impact that even small design changes, like adjusting bevel angles, can have on the performance of trawl otter-boards. The key takeaway is that a 12-degree bevel angle appears to optimize lift and lift-drag ratio, while an 8-degree angle enhances stability.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Optimization Through Hydrodynamics

The available research supports treating otter-board design as a hydrodynamic optimization problem rather than a simple matter of adding a bevel. One study compared the hydrodynamic performance of an otter board with an optimized structure against another board model using numerical simulation. The comparison verified the correctness of the study's analysis results, indicating that simulation can help evaluate structural changes before operational use.

Refining Angles for Efficiency

Future work can focus on refining bevel angles and related otter-board geometry to improve fishing performance. The featured article describes angle adjustment as a way to influence lift, stability, and energy savings in trawl fishing. Research-backed optimization methods may therefore help connect small geometric changes with measurable operational outcomes.

Efficiency Within a Larger System

Otter-board efficiency is only one part of a broader trawling system that includes the net, vessel, operating conditions, and seabed interaction. Improvements in one component may not produce the same result across every configuration or fishery. Meaningful assessment therefore requires attention to system-level effects, operational trade-offs, and the conditions under which a design is deployed.

Designing for Safer Operations

The SEAFDEC Training Department designed V-shaped otter boards in 2018 to improve fuel efficiency, reduce seabed disturbance, and enhance operational safety. A study evaluated the performance of these boards during actual trawl fishing operations. This frames board geometry as a practical concern for fishing crews, with potential implications for operating costs, environmental disturbance, and safety at sea.

These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing otter-board design. By carefully selecting the appropriate bevel angle, fisheries can improve the efficiency of their operations, reduce energy consumption, and enhance the stability of their fishing gear.

Further research could explore other design parameters and their interactions with bevel angles to achieve even greater improvements in otter-board performance. The ongoing pursuit of efficiency and sustainability will continue to drive innovation in fishing gear technology.

How other otter-board designs compare

In another comparison, an experimental board had lower drag and a lift-drag ratio 1.41 times that of a conventional board at intended attack angles.[1]

During an experimental semi-pelagic trawl operation, board spacing was 1.1–1.2 times wider than with the conventional board.[1]

Together, these studies offer comparisons across different board designs and operating contexts, rather than direct tests of the bevel-angle models.[1] [2]

Three-layer parallel plates tested in a wind tunnel

PopulationOtter-board models[3]
Sample sizeFour[3]
SettingWind tunnel at 28 m / s[3]
ComparisonFour different bevel angles (8°, 10°, 12° and 14°)[3]
Main outcomeHydrodynamic performances, including drag, lift, pitch moment and center of pressure coefficients and lift-drag ratio[3]
Effect sizeMaximum lift coefficient 2.598 (a=65°) and maximum lift-drag ratio 2.607 (a=37.5°) for the 12° bevel model; for the 8° model, absolute Cm is 0.174 and minimum Cp variation coefficient is 4.37%[3]
Times cited0[3]

Questions beyond the wind-tunnel comparison

  • Would the relative performance of the bevel models persist when full-scale geometry and operating orientation are represented?[3] [4]
  • How would the bevel-angle results relate to board spacing and performance during a semi-pelagic trawl operation?[1] [3]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1051/matecconf/201712805003, Alternate LINK

Title: Effect Of Bevel Angle Of Three-Layer Parallel Plate On Hydrodynamic Performances Of Otter-Board

Subject: General Medicine

Journal: MATEC Web of Conferences

Publisher: EDP Sciences

Authors: Lei Wang, Lu Min Wang, Yu Zhang, Ai Zhong Zhou, Yong Li Liu, Wen Wen Yu, Xun Zhang

Published: 2017-01-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

How do 'lift coefficient', 'drag coefficient', 'lift-drag ratio', 'pitch moment coefficient', and 'center of pressure coefficient' relate to trawl otter-board performance?

Trawl otter-boards use bevel angles to optimize performance. The 'lift coefficient' (Cy) represents the upward force generated, while the 'drag coefficient' (Cx) indicates resistance. The 'lift-drag ratio' (Cy/Cx) shows efficiency, and 'pitch moment coefficient' (Cm) relates to stability. 'Center of pressure coefficient' (Cp) affects balance, crucial for trawl net spread and reduced energy costs in fishing operations.

2

What specific bevel angles were tested, and what were the key findings regarding the 'lift coefficient', 'lift-drag ratio', and stability of trawl otter-boards?

The study indicates that a 12-degree bevel angle provides the best balance of lift and drag, achieving a high lift coefficient of 2.598 at a 65° angle of attack and a lift-drag ratio of 2.607 at a 37.5° angle of attack. However, an 8-degree bevel angle offers superior stability, as measured by an absolute Cm value of 0.174 and a Cp variation coefficient of 4.37%. These findings highlight the trade-offs between lift and stability in otter-board design.

3

In what ways does adjusting the bevel angle on trawl otter-boards affect hydrodynamic performance, and how can these adjustments lead to energy savings?

Adjusting the bevel angle on trawl otter-boards directly influences their hydrodynamic performance. A well-chosen angle can maximize the lift coefficient, reduce the drag coefficient, and enhance overall stability. Optimizing these factors can lead to significant energy savings, increased catch efficiency, and improved maneuverability during trawl fishing operations. These adjustments can substantially reduce fuel consumption and operational costs.

4

What aspects of otter-board design were not investigated in this study, and how might those factors also impact hydrodynamic performance?

While the study examines the impact of specific bevel angles (8°, 10°, 12°, and 14°) on three-layer parallel plate otter-boards, it does not delve into the material composition or surface textures, which also contribute to hydrodynamic performance. Further research could explore how different materials or surface treatments interact with these bevel angles to further refine trawl otter-board designs. Additionaly the study focuses only on wind tunnel tests and not on real world performance.

5

What are the potential implications of these findings for the future of trawl fishing practices, and how could implementing these adjustments lead to more sustainable operations?

The findings suggest that by carefully selecting bevel angles for trawl otter-boards, fishing operations can achieve notable improvements in fuel efficiency and catch rates. Implementing a 12-degree bevel angle can maximize lift and reduce drag, leading to lower energy consumption and a higher lift-drag ratio. This adjustment enhances operational profitability and minimizes the environmental impact of trawl fishing. Conversely, prioritizing an 8-degree bevel provides greater stability. Combining both results offers the potential for more sustainable and effective practices in offshore fishing.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.