Stylized digital illustration of an ancient Andean face-to-face confrontation.

Unmasking Ancient Conflicts: What Broken Noses Reveal About Pre-Columbian Life

"Delve into the hidden stories of violence and resilience in pre-Columbian Atacama, where nasal fractures offer a unique lens into social dynamics and conflict resolution."


Archaeological investigations often grapple with the elusiveness of conflict. While weaponry and defensive structures provide circumstantial evidence, the human body offers a direct testament to acts of violence endured by individuals. Bioarchaeology, the study of human remains, allows us to examine skeletal trauma as a window into the past, revealing the scarring of violence through broken and altered bones.

This approach provides an intimate lens through which to view violence in antiquity, offering insights that transcend the broad strokes of warfare or imperial conquest. Small-scale conflicts and interpersonal disputes, often obscured in grand narratives, require careful examination to uncover their context and meaning. By integrating bioarchaeology, we gain a more intimate and contextualized understanding of violent injury, allowing us to analyze conflict at the individual and community levels.

In the arid landscape of pre-Columbian San Pedro de Atacama, a remarkable number of individuals bear the marks of face-to-face confrontations: broken noses. These injuries, prevalent during the Middle Period (AD 400–1000) among the Atacameño oases, raise intriguing questions about the nature of violence in a society characterized by long-term occupation and access to freshwater resources. This article explores the bioarchaeological evidence of nasal fractures, offering a glimpse into the hidden conflicts that shaped life in this ancient community.

The Silent Narratives of Nasal Fractures

Stylized digital illustration of an ancient Andean face-to-face confrontation.

The study, encompassing 493 individuals from eight cemeteries in San Pedro de Atacama, reveals that 15.8% suffered antemortem cranial fractures. Strikingly, the overwhelming majority (80.8%) of these fractures targeted the nasal bones. This concentration of injuries suggests that face-to-face confrontations were a dominant form of violent interaction in this society.

Unlike many archaeological sites where evidence of warfare or large-scale conflict dominates, the Atacameño remains tell a different story. The absence of widespread weaponry and defensive fortifications suggests that violence was not necessarily driven by resource scarcity or territorial disputes. Instead, the prevalence of nasal fractures hints at a more localized and interpersonal form of conflict resolution.
The data reveals several key insights into the nature of violence in pre-Columbian Atacama:
  • Gender Disparity: Males were significantly more likely to sustain nasal fractures than females, suggesting a gendered dimension to conflict.
  • Age-Related Patterns: Nasal fractures were primarily observed in adults, indicating that participation in violent encounters was largely confined to mature individuals.
  • Social Context: Variations in fracture rates across different cemeteries, particularly within the Solcor ayllu, suggest that social status and kin relations may have influenced exposure to violence.
  • Temporal Consistency: The prevalence of nasal fractures remained relatively stable throughout the Middle Period, indicating a long-established tradition of face-to-face conflict.
Despite the apparent peace and prosperity of the Middle Period, the bioarchaeological evidence suggests that violence was a persistent feature of Atacameño society. These findings challenge the notion of a conflict-free past and highlight the importance of examining the complexities of social life through the lens of human remains. The standardized nature of these injuries hints at a potential system of conflict resolution, where face-to-face confrontations played a role in maintaining social order or resolving disputes.

Revisiting the Past Through Broken Bones

This exploration of traumatic injury in the Middle Period aimed to shed some light on the practices that resulted in nasal fractures becoming nearly commonplace. However, the consistency with which this activity was engaged in during the length of the Middle Period suggests that more than acts of interpersonal violence we may be documenting some form of socially sanctioned activity that involved face-to-face confrontation. Without more detailed study we are unable to identify what these individuals shared that resulted in injury. While it seems unlikely that there were “attackers” and “victims” in the traditional sense, what this may be is evidence of a local means of conflict resolution involving direct confrontation between adult individuals. Moreover, it is possible that there was a regularized quality to these contests that produced standardized injury patterns. Unsurprisingly, it is evident that the peace and prosperity that characterized the Middle Period was not tied to a complete lack of hostilities between different social groups and this leaves open the possibility for a deeper exploration of violence in this time of growing prosperity and increasing social hierarchization.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.