Diverse visitors enjoying a vibrant urban park with a central glowing lake.

Unlocking Urban Parks: How Understanding Visitors Can Boost Their Value

"Discover how segmenting park visitors based on their perceived value can optimize park management and increase willingness to pay."


Urban parks are more than just patches of green; they're dynamic spaces that promote health, recreation, and cultural exchange. As our appreciation for quality of life and ecological resources grows, so does the importance of understanding the value people place on these parks.

Parks serve multiple purposes, acting as venues for nature appreciation, relaxation, and diverse cultural events. They cater to both local residents and tourists, offering a wide range of benefits—physical, psychological, aesthetic, environmental, economic, social, cultural, historical, and recreational. The core values people seek in these parks can vary greatly based on individual perceptions.

Understanding perceived value is key to explaining consumer behavior and influencing individual attitudes. Just as value shapes attitudes and behaviors, analyzing user behavior and willingness to invest, can lead to powerful improvements in the value of a park. By focusing on how visitors perceive and value urban parks, we can unlock insights into better management and sustainable development.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Visitor Value Groups

The cited study classifies urban park visitors according to place value. It identifies three groups: Local Seekers (LS), Ecology Seekers (ES), and Recreation Seekers (RS). This classification shows that visitors may attach different kinds of value to the same park.

An Unrelated Retail Source

The supplied source is the Urban Outfitters website, which describes shopping for men’s and women’s apparel, streetwear clothing, apartment décor, and furniture. It does not describe an accepted method for studying urban park visitors. It therefore provides no source-supported basis for evaluating standard approaches or their limitations in urban park research.

Decoding Visitor Value: Three Key Groups

Diverse visitors enjoying a vibrant urban park with a central glowing lake.

To understand how visitors perceive value, researchers used latent profile analysis (LPA) in a study of Gwanggyo Lake Park (GLP) in South Korea. This approach identified three distinct groups:

Each group seeks something different from the park experience:

  • Local Seekers (LS): These visitors prioritize the local culture and community aspects of the park.
  • Ecology Seekers (ES): These visitors are most interested in the park's ecological value and natural environment.
  • Recreation Seekers (RS): These visitors focus on recreational activities, scenery, and the therapeutic benefits of the park.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Perceived Place Value Research

Park and Song’s 2018 study, “Visitors’ Perceived Place Value and the Willingness to Pay in an Urban Lake Park,” was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, volume 15, issue 11, article 2518. Research on perceived place value has also used latent profile analysis (LPA) to examine park visitors, cultural tourists, and residents of locations with tourist attractions. A 2026 study on household preference and willingness to pay for urban recreational facilities cites research addressing the non-market value, environmental improvements, utility, affordability, and environmental-quality benefits of urban parks.

Need for More Specific Park Attributes

The cited research identifies a limitation in current approaches to sustainable use and ecological development of lake parks. It recommends examining a more direct alternative for sustainable usage and ecological development. Future studies should subdivide park attributes more specifically according to visitors’ purposes for using the park.

By understanding these distinct preferences, park managers can tailor their strategies to meet the specific needs of each group, enhancing their overall experience and satisfaction.

Turning Insights into Action: Tailoring Park Management

The study also explored the willingness of each group to pay for different park attributes, revealing key priorities:

The willingness to pay varied significantly between the three groups: <ul> <li>All groups valued basic infrastructure improvements the most.</li> <li>Recreation Seekers were more willing to invest in advanced services.</li> <li>Ecology Seekers showed a greater interest in ecological activities.</li> </ul>

These insights can inform targeted management strategies, such as specialized zoning and ecotourism initiatives tailored to each visitor type. Understanding visitor preferences is essential for making informed decisions about resource allocation and park development, ensuring that urban parks continue to thrive as valuable community assets.

How later studies place perceived-value profiling

Another later study cites this work among research on the utility and affordability of urban parks, and reports broader evidence that preferences and willingness to pay vary across user groups.[1]

The urban lake park study at a glance

PopulationVisitors to GLP, an urban lake park[2]
Sample size652 visitors[2]
SettingGLP, an urban lake park in Korea[2]
Main outcomeWillingness to pay (WTP) for park attributes[2]
Effect sizeDifferences in MWTP between Level 1 and Level 3: basic infrastructure 18,261 KRW, advanced services 13,965 KRW, and ecological activities 12,683 KRW[2]
Confidence interval90% confidence intervals[2]
p-valuePAY coefficient estimates were negatively significant (p < 0.01); three-profile model was significant (p < 0.01)[2]
Funding2017 Basic Research of Suwon Research Institute, SRI-basic-2017-07[2]
Times cited26[2]

How attribute-level willingness to pay differed

  • 90 % confidence intervalsThe reported total-visitor estimates used 90% confidence intervals produced through Krinsky–Robb parametric bootstrapping.[3]

What the profile results capture

The profiles summarize patterns in visitors’ ratings across place-value items, rather than simply grouping people by a single stated preference. That makes the approach useful for comparing how different value patterns relate to willingness to pay, but the ratings themselves are perceptions of the park.[3]

What keeps these estimates provisional

  • The researchers used taxes rather than admission fees as the payment vehicle, so that choice may have pushed estimated willingness to pay downward.[3]
  • Estimated willingness to pay rose with higher levels of infrastructure and services, but ecological-activity estimates did not follow that pattern.[3]
  • The authors call for park attributes to be divided more specifically by visitors’ purposes when examining sustainable use and ecological development.[3]

What remains unresolved about park valuation

  • Would the profile patterns and attribute trade-offs hold in other urban lake parks, rather than this study setting?[2]
  • How would more finely divided attributes, organized around visitors’ purposes, change the estimated value of ecological activities?[3]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.3390/ijerph15112518, Alternate LINK

Title: Visitors’ Perceived Place Value And The Willingness To Pay In An Urban Lake Park

Subject: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Publisher: MDPI AG

Authors: Chanyul Park, Hwasung Song

Published: 2018-11-09

Everything You Need To Know

1

What makes urban parks so important?

Urban parks are more than just green spaces; they are dynamic venues that serve several purposes, including nature appreciation, relaxation, and cultural events. They cater to a diverse group of visitors, ranging from local residents to tourists. These parks offer a variety of benefits, such as physical, psychological, aesthetic, environmental, economic, social, cultural, historical, and recreational advantages. The value people place on these parks varies depending on individual perceptions.

2

What are the three visitor groups identified in the study, and what does each group value?

The three key groups identified through latent profile analysis (LPA) are: Local Seekers (LS), Ecology Seekers (ES), and Recreation Seekers (RS). Local Seekers prioritize local culture and community. Ecology Seekers value the park's natural environment, while Recreation Seekers focus on activities, scenery, and therapeutic benefits. Understanding these groups allows park managers to tailor strategies for improved visitor satisfaction.

3

Why is it important to understand the perceived value of urban parks?

Understanding the perceived value of urban parks is critical because it directly influences visitor behavior and attitudes. Analyzing how visitors perceive and value the park unlocks insights that lead to improved park management and sustainable development. By understanding the different types of visitors and what they value, park managers can make informed decisions about resource allocation, programming, and infrastructure development, ultimately enhancing the overall experience and ensuring the park's long-term viability.

4

What are the implications of understanding the different visitor groups and their preferences?

The implications of understanding visitor preferences are significant. By knowing the priorities of each group—Local Seekers (LS), Ecology Seekers (ES), and Recreation Seekers (RS)—park managers can tailor park management strategies effectively. This includes providing programs, facilities, and communication that specifically cater to each group's needs. Tailoring these aspects enhances the overall experience and increases the willingness of visitors to invest in the park's resources, leading to greater satisfaction and a more sustainable park environment.

5

What is latent profile analysis (LPA), and how was it used in the study of Gwanggyo Lake Park (GLP)?

The study of Gwanggyo Lake Park (GLP) in South Korea used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify distinct visitor groups. LPA is a statistical method used to identify subgroups within a larger population based on shared characteristics or preferences. This approach allowed researchers to segment park visitors into groups—Local Seekers (LS), Ecology Seekers (ES), and Recreation Seekers (RS)—each with different priorities and values. By understanding these groups, park managers can better meet their needs.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.