Brachiaria pasture showing stages of deferred grazing.

Unlock Grazing Potential: How Deferred Pasture Management Boosts Forage Quality

"Optimize your Brachiaria pastures with strategic deferment for better forage production and livestock nutrition."


In tropical climates, forage production fluctuates seasonally, posing challenges for livestock farmers. While this is a reality, strategic pasture management techniques can mitigate these effects. One such technique is deferment, which involves setting aside a specific pasture area and excluding it from grazing during late summer or fall. This allows for the accumulation of forage that can be grazed during periods of scarcity.

When using deferred grazing, deciding how long to keep the pasture deferred is crucial. This decision should consider the growth patterns of the forage plant within the specific environment. Understanding these patterns allows farmers to determine the optimal deferment periods, maximizing animal performance by providing high-quality forage.

This article explores the effects of deferment on the structure of Brachiaria pastures, focusing on tiller categories (vegetative, reproductive, and dead) and forage production. The goal is to identify the ideal deferment period for Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk pastures in the Viçosa region of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Deferred Grazing in Practice

The USDA Forest Service publishes Grazing Statistical Summary Reports on grazing use across National Forest System rangelands for Congress, partners, permittees, the livestock industry, and other agencies. AgResearch describes deferred grazing as dropping some paddocks from rotation from mid-spring onward to optimize grazing pressure on the remaining paddocks and maintain pasture quality. On a summer-dry beef and sheep hill-country farm northwest of Hamilton, AgResearch estimated that deferring 15% of the farm increased total farm and ... .

Planning and Evidence Gaps

NRCS guidance covers planning grazing management across rangelands, grazed forest lands, and native and naturalized pasture, as well as forage crops. The AgResearch Deferred Grazing Handbook defines the practice as removing some paddocks from rotation to optimize grazing pressure on the remaining paddocks and maintain pasture quality from mid-spring onward. A 2024 study in northern Tanzania notes that deferred grazing is viewed as a strategy for improving rangeland productivity and health, but that empirical evidence from drylands of East Africa remains limited.

From Sampson to Modern Deferment

Deferred-rotation grazing was first developed in 1895 and was later implemented in the early 20th century by Arthur Sampson, known as the “father of range management,” in Oregon’s Blue Mountains. Sampson’s system divided the range into two pastures, with each pasture deferred until seed set every other year. Later systems modified this basic approach. A Beef + Lamb New Zealand factsheet describes deferred grazing more generally as resting pastures from midspring until late summer, allowing perennial ryegrass to produce seeds while new tiller buds remain dormant over summer and develop into new tillers in autumn.

Optimizing Brachiaria Pastures: The Sweet Spot for Deferment

Brachiaria pasture showing stages of deferred grazing.

A study was conducted to evaluate the impact of different deferment periods (18, 46, 74, and 121 days) on Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk pastures. Researchers analyzed tiller population density, forage mass, and morphological components to determine the optimal deferment strategy.

Key findings revealed a reduction in the number of vegetative tillers during the deferment period. Longer deferment periods also led to increased stem mass and dead forage mass. However, the mass of green leaf blade remained relatively stable across the different deferment periods.

  • Vegetative Tillers: Decreased with longer deferment, as they transitioned into reproductive tillers.
  • Stem Mass: Increased with longer deferment as plants competed for light.
  • Dead Forage Mass: Initially decreased due to mineralization, then increased as leaves senesced.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Recovery Can Build Dead Material

Research on piatã grass reports increased mass of dead tissues in B. decumbens cv. Basilisk pastures under different deferment periods. A 2024 study of marandu palisadegrass likewise identifies buildup of senescent tissue under extended recovery periods. Research on Piata palisade grass further reports that deferred pasture generally contains few heavy tillers, high percentages of stem and dead tissues, and less live leaf.

Management Must Be Measured

NRCS recommendations state that grazing or browsing duration and intensity should be based on desired plant health and productivity objectives. The same guidance calls for soil testing for organic matter and nutrients through a land-grant university or accredited laboratory. These requirements show that deferred grazing is not a fixed prescription: its implementation depends on monitoring, objectives, and site conditions. A general overview describes the practice as strategically delaying grazing during a specific period, with implications for plant health and animal productivity.

The research suggests a deferment period of around 70 days for Brachiaria decumbens in the Viçosa region. This timeframe balances forage quantity and quality, ensuring sufficient forage production without compromising its nutritional value. Shorter deferment may improve forage quality, while longer periods increase overall biomass.

Balancing Forage Quantity and Quality: The Farmer's Choice

The optimal deferment period depends on the farmer's objectives. If the goal is to maximize animal performance, a shorter deferment period may be more suitable, leading to higher-quality forage. Conversely, if the aim is to support a larger number of animals (higher stocking rate), a longer deferment period might be necessary to accumulate sufficient biomass.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

A Growing Research Field

A 2026 study of research trends describes grazing management as a “hot research topic” because grazing is the main land use of grazing lands. Its bibliometric analysis examined 348 papers published between 2008 and 2024 across diverse grazing lands. The study reports that recent research has focused on the ecological role of grazing lands, including protecting and restoring degraded areas and improving their management.

Balancing Production and Ecosystems

Grasslands provide animal products for 1 billion people through grazing, but the cited research describes them as vulnerable to global change. Improved grazing management may enhance ecosystem services, yet optimizing trade-offs between food production and environmental benefits remains a challenge. Carbon sequestration is specifically identified as one of the environmental benefits involved in this trade-off. A five-year, multi-state study reported by Beef Magazine also examined grazing management’s effects on ranch productivity and soil health.

Another strategy is staggered deferment, where different areas of pasture are deferred at different times. This can provide a continuous supply of high-quality forage throughout the grazing season. More research is needed to validate the benefits of this approach.

Ultimately, the key to successful deferred grazing lies in finding the right balance between forage quantity and quality. By understanding the growth dynamics of Brachiaria pastures and tailoring deferment periods to specific objectives, farmers can optimize forage production and enhance livestock performance in tropical environments.

A randomized deferment trial in Basilisk pastures

Study designRandomised or controlled trial[1]
PopulationBrachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk pastures[1]
Sample sizetwo replications[1]
SettingViçosa, Minas Gerais State, Brazil[1]
Duration18, 46, 74 and 121 days[1]
Comparisonfour deferred grazing periods: 18, 46, 74 and 121 days[1]
Main outcometiller population density, forage mass and morphological components[1]
Effect sizeVT reduced from 1,491 to 944 tiller m-2; RT and DT averages were 211 and 456 tiller m-2; GSM increased from 2,965 to 4,877 kg ha-1 of dry mass; DFM increased from 2,324 to 4,823 kg ha-1 of dry mass; GLBM average was 2,047 kg ha-1 of dry mass[1]
Times cited29[1]

What two pasture replicates can establish

Randomised or controlled trial (level 3 of 8)

This randomized-block trial compared deferred Basilisk pastures across four management periods, so it can show how the measured pasture traits differed within this experiment.[1]

The measured changes behind the pasture response

  • 547 tillers·m−2Vegetative tiller density fell by 547 tillers m-2, from 1,491 to 944 tillers m-2.[1]
  • 1912 kg·ha−1·of·dry·massGSM increased by 1,912 kg ha-1 of dry mass, from 2,965 to 4,877 kg ha-1.[1]
  • 2,047 kg·ha−1·of·dry·massGLBM averaged 2,047 kg ha-1 of dry mass and was not influenced by the deferment periods.[1]

What the structural shift tells us

The pasture accumulated more of the measured GSM and DFM while green leaf blade mass stayed unchanged, so greater total material did not automatically mean more green leaf.[1]

The decline in vegetative tillers shows that deferment changed the plant population structure, not just the amount of forage present.[1]

What a follow-up would need to show

  • Would the reported pasture response remain consistent with more replications across sites beyond Viçosa?[1] [2]
  • Would the approximately 70-day conclusion hold when deferment begins at a different date or under different fertilization conditions?[1] [2]

Sources

  1. Estrutura do capim-braquiária durante o diferimento da pastagem (Universidade Estadual de Maringa, 2010)
  2. periodicos.uem.br (periodicos.uem.br, 2010)

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v32i2.7922, Alternate LINK

Title: Estrutura Do Capim-Braquiária Durante O Diferimento Da Pastagem

Subject: Animal Science and Zoology

Journal: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences

Publisher: Universidade Estadual de Maringa

Authors: Manoel Eduardo Rozalino Santos, Dilermando Miranda Da Fonseca, Virgilio Mesquita Gomes, Eric Márcio Balbino, Marcela Azevedo Magalhães

Published: 2010-07-06

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is deferment and why is it important in pasture management?

Deferment is a pasture management technique where a specific area of the Brachiaria pasture is excluded from grazing. This allows the forage to accumulate and be used during periods of scarcity. It is significant because it mitigates seasonal fluctuations in forage production, common in tropical climates, ensuring a consistent feed supply for livestock. Implications include improved forage structure, increased biomass, and enhanced livestock nutrition, all crucial for successful farming practices.

2

What is the optimal deferment period for Brachiaria pastures?

The optimal deferment period refers to the ideal duration for which the Brachiaria pasture should be excluded from grazing. Determining this period is crucial because it directly impacts both the quantity and quality of the forage available. The best period maximizes animal performance by balancing forage production without compromising nutritional value. The study suggests that around 70 days is optimal for Brachiaria decumbens in the Viçosa region. Shorter periods may favor forage quality, while longer periods increase biomass.

3

How does deferment impact the structure of Brachiaria pastures?

The structure of Brachiaria pastures is significantly influenced by deferment, specifically affecting tiller categories. Vegetative tillers decrease during deferment as they transition to reproductive stages. Stem mass increases due to competition for light, and dead forage mass initially decreases from mineralization, then increases as leaves senesce. Understanding these changes helps farmers make informed decisions, aligning pasture management with their goals for animal performance and stocking rates.

4

What were the key findings of the research on Brachiaria pastures?

The key findings of the study on Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk pastures in the Viçosa region revealed the impact of deferment periods on various pasture components. The number of vegetative tillers reduced during the deferment period. Longer deferment increased stem mass and dead forage mass. Green leaf blade mass remained relatively stable across different deferment periods. These findings are critical for determining the best deferment strategy, balancing forage quantity and quality.

5

How does the farmer's objectives affect the best deferment strategy?

The farmer's objectives significantly influence the best deferment strategy. If the primary goal is to maximize animal performance, a shorter deferment period may be better because it often leads to higher-quality forage. Conversely, if the aim is to support a larger number of animals, a longer deferment period may be necessary to accumulate a sufficient amount of biomass. The choice hinges on balancing the needs of the livestock with the available resources, highlighting the importance of tailored pasture management.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.