Illustration of hammertoe correction with K-wire, symbolizing stability and healing.

Toe Troubles? K-Wires Might Be Your Best Bet for Hammertoe Correction

"A new study reveals that traditional K-wires provide superior stability for lesser toe arthrodesis compared to newer expanding implants, challenging assumptions about advanced surgical techniques."


Hammertoe and claw toe deformities are common foot problems that can cause pain and limit mobility. When conservative treatments fail, surgery, specifically proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis, becomes a viable option to correct these deformities. This procedure involves fusing a joint in the toe to straighten it.

For years, Kirschner wires (K-wires) have been a mainstay in PIP joint arthrodesis, providing temporary fixation while the bones fuse together. However, K-wires are not without their drawbacks. Complications like loosening, bending, migration, and even infection have led to the development of newer intramedullary devices designed to offer improved stability and reduce these risks.

But do these newer, more expensive implants really offer a better outcome? A recent study published in Foot & Ankle International sought to answer this question by comparing the biomechanical performance of K-wires to two popular expanding implants: the X Fuse and Smart Toe systems. The results might surprise you.

The K-Wire Comeback: Stability Reigns Supreme

Illustration of hammertoe correction with K-wire, symbolizing stability and healing.

The study, conducted by researchers at Penn State Hershey College of Medicine, used cadaveric toe pairs to compare the stability of K-wires, X Fuse, and Smart Toe in PIP joint arthrodesis. The toes were subjected to cyclic loading, mimicking the forces experienced during walking. The researchers then measured the load to failure and initial stiffness of each fixation method.

The findings revealed that K-wires actually outperformed both the X Fuse and Smart Toe implants in terms of strength and stiffness. Specifically, the K-wires demonstrated a significantly higher average failure force compared to both implant systems. This means the K-wires could withstand greater force before the fusion site failed.
Here's a summary of the key findings:
  • K-wires exhibited significantly greater failure force than X Fuse.
  • K-wires also showed a significantly greater failure force compared to Smart Toe.
  • K-wires demonstrated greater initial stiffness than Smart Toe.
  • Failure modes differed: K-wires bent or breached cortical bone, X Fuse typically pulled out, and Smart Toe breached cortical bone.
Why did the K-wires perform so well? The researchers suggest that the K-wires' strong purchase in the cortical bone of the phalanges, away from the fusion site, may contribute to their stability. In contrast, the intramedullary implants didn't benefit from this interaction with the cortical bone.

What This Means for You

While newer implants offer potential advantages, this study serves as a reminder that traditional techniques often remain the gold standard. If you're considering surgery for hammertoe or claw toe, talk to your doctor about the pros and cons of K-wires versus newer implants. While this study highlights the biomechanical stability of K-wires, your surgeon will consider various factors, including your individual anatomy, activity level, and risk factors, to determine the best approach for your specific situation.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.