The Power of Film: Can Documentaries Spark Social Change?

Theo Raines in Culture & Society August 2025 • 4 min read.

"Exploring the activist role of filmmakers in documenting human rights abuses and promoting justice."

Documentary films have long served as powerful tools for exposing injustice, promoting empathy, and inspiring social change. Filmmakers often take on the role of activists, using their craft to shed light on human rights abuses, challenge dominant narratives, and advocate for a more just world. This article delves into the activist role of filmmakers, particularly focusing on those who document the aftermath of genocide and human rights violations.

The power of film lies in its ability to connect with audiences on an emotional level, fostering understanding and empathy for victims of violence and oppression. By giving voice to marginalized communities and challenging official accounts, filmmakers can spark public debate, mobilize action, and contribute to a more informed and engaged citizenry.

This exploration will consider the ethical complexities that arise when filmmakers engage with perpetrators of violence, the strategies they employ to gain access and elicit testimony, and the potential consequences of their work for both victims and perpetrators. By examining specific case studies, we can gain a deeper understanding of the impact of documentary filmmaking as a form of activism.

How Can Filmmakers Document Human Rights Abuses?

Film camera projecting scenes of social injustice.

Filmmakers documenting human rights abuses often face significant challenges, including navigating political sensitivities, ensuring the safety of participants, and grappling with the ethical implications of their work. They must make difficult decisions about how to represent violence, protect the anonymity of vulnerable individuals, and balance the desire for objectivity with their own personal beliefs and values.

Joshua Oppenheimer, an American filmmaker, has produced documentaries like "The Act of Killing" (2012) and "The Look of Silence" (2014), that explore the anti-communist genocide in Indonesia in 1965–66. Rithy Panh, who experienced the Cambodian genocide, created documentaries about this tragedy with "S-21, The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine" (2003) and "The Missing Picture" (2013). These films demonstrate using cinema to advocate for human rights by helping recover memories of a traumatic past.

Building Trust with Victims: Establishing a safe and supportive environment where victims feel comfortable sharing their stories.
Ethical Considerations: Balancing the need to expose injustice with the responsibility to protect vulnerable individuals.
Representing Violence: Making decisions about how to depict violence without sensationalizing or exploiting trauma.
Challenging Official Narratives: Presenting alternative perspectives that counter dominant accounts and expose hidden truths.

Traditionally, filmmakers work mostly with victims, but to fully understand a conflict, involving the perpetrators is also necessary. This article explores how filmmakers decide to engage with perpetrators, how they convince them to participate, and what the results of this process might be. Since Oppenheimer's involvement with Anwar Congo in "The Act of Killing" (2012) is especially problematic, exploring this relationship in depth is the central purpose of this article.

Can Film Spark Action for Justice?

While documentaries alone cannot solve complex social and political problems, they can play a vital role in raising awareness, promoting dialogue, and inspiring action. By giving voice to the marginalized, challenging official narratives, and fostering empathy for victims of violence, filmmakers can contribute to a more just and equitable world. The impact of their work may not always be immediately apparent, but over time, documentaries can shift public opinion, influence policy decisions, and empower communities to fight for their rights.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

How do documentary filmmakers contribute to social change?

Documentary filmmakers contribute to social change by exposing human rights abuses, challenging official narratives, and inspiring action. They use film to connect with audiences on an emotional level, fostering empathy for victims of violence and oppression. By giving voice to marginalized communities, filmmakers can spark public debate, mobilize action, and contribute to a more informed and engaged citizenry. The impact of their work includes shifting public opinion, influencing policy decisions, and empowering communities to fight for their rights.

What ethical complexities do filmmakers face when documenting human rights violations?

Filmmakers face several ethical complexities. These include navigating political sensitivities, ensuring the safety of participants, and grappling with how to represent violence without sensationalizing or exploiting trauma. They must balance the need to expose injustice with the responsibility to protect vulnerable individuals. Making decisions about how to depict violence, protect the anonymity of vulnerable individuals, and balancing the desire for objectivity with their own personal beliefs and values are also very important.

How do filmmakers gain access to sensitive information and elicit testimony about human rights abuses?

Filmmakers often employ strategies such as building trust with victims, establishing a safe and supportive environment, and showing respect for the sensitive nature of the subject matter. They must carefully consider the ethical implications of their work, balancing the need to expose injustice with the responsibility to protect vulnerable individuals. The strategies include Building Trust with Victims, Ethical Considerations, Representing Violence, and Challenging Official Narratives.

Can you describe the significance of specific documentaries in the context of human rights documentation?

Documentaries like "The Act of Killing" (2012) and "The Look of Silence" (2014) by Joshua Oppenheimer, and "S-21, The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine" (2003) and "The Missing Picture" (2013) by Rithy Panh, are very significant. They demonstrate the power of cinema to advocate for human rights by helping recover memories of a traumatic past and challenging official narratives. These films shed light on human rights violations and challenge dominant narratives, inspiring action for a more just world. These specific examples have become influential in the field.

What are the potential consequences of filmmakers engaging with perpetrators of violence?

The engagement with perpetrators can have several consequences, both positive and negative. It can provide a more complete understanding of the conflict by presenting alternative perspectives. However, it also raises ethical concerns about the potential for inadvertently legitimizing or glorifying perpetrators, as highlighted by Oppenheimer's work with Anwar Congo in "The Act of Killing" (2012). The filmmakers must carefully consider the implications of such engagement on the victims and the potential impact on the pursuit of justice.