Community members sharing and celebrating their donations.

The Kindness Ripple: How Sharing Donation Data Can Spark Generosity

"Uncover the surprising ways that cleverly revealing donation information can transform communities and boost public good initiatives."


Imagine a village opera, a cherished tradition in southern China, where the community comes together to celebrate custom and religion. Funding these events once meant equal shares from all villagers. Over time, this evolved, with families deciding how much to give, leading to varied contributions. To honor generosity, organizers began publishing a list on an LED screen, showcasing names and donations—but setting the right threshold for publication has always been tricky.

This simple act of sharing information, reasonable or not, sparks conversation. Villagers, aware of how they're perceived, might adjust their behavior if they feel they've created a negative impression. It's a microcosm of a larger question: How can we foster cooperation, and what role does transparency play?

Social dilemmas are everywhere. Despite our inherent selfishness, cooperation thrives, sparking endless research. The public goods game (PGG) is a popular model for studying this, where individuals secretly choose to contribute to a common pool or not. Publishing donation information can foster cooperation if done correctly.

The Power of the Donation List

Community members sharing and celebrating their donations.

In the classic PGG model, individuals decide whether to privately invest tokens into a common pool. This investment is then multiplied, and the resulting public good is distributed equally. However, this creates a dilemma: those who don't contribute (defectors) still benefit, undermining cooperation. This is where the clever handling of a donation list comes in.

Indirect reciprocity is another key factor, Individuals make decisions based on the image score, reputation, and personal image. Face (Mianzi) is vital to consider in a community because it defines behavior and influences social communications. Individuals' self-assessment plays a role in a community’s participation.

  • Sharing Wisely: Donation list affects individual’s self-assessment and thus affects their behavior, therefore openness and familiarity of the situation, the evaluation ability of the audience, the interpersonal relationship and many other elements have impacts on the individuals' self-assessment.
  • Gossip's Role: Verbal communication is an important way to transfer social information, this makes gossip an efficient social control mechanism.
Consider a public goods game where partial donation information is published. Decision-makers set the threshold for publishing, and this affects social behavior. Many factors, including gossip, influence self-assessment after the list is published, affecting behavior. The goal is to find ways to promote cooperation effectively.

Transparency Done Right

Publishing donation information incompletely promotes cooperation, leading to a more harmonious community. By sharing donation data strategically, we can foster a sense of collective responsibility and encourage greater participation in initiatives. The decision of threshold becomes very simple when community analyze the mean of the last donations and use this mean as threshold. If decision makers follow a well-constructed method then individual will have a increased participation in the community. This in turn gives decision makers a better way to invest in new public goods projects.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.10.068, Alternate LINK

Title: Cleverly Handling The Donation Information Can Promote Cooperation In Public Goods Game

Subject: Applied Mathematics

Journal: Applied Mathematics and Computation

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Authors: Qiao Chen, Tong Chen, Yongjie Wang

Published: 2019-04-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

How does publishing donation information affect cooperation in a Public Goods Game?

In a Public Goods Game (PGG), individuals decide whether to contribute to a common pool. The total investment is multiplied and distributed equally. The issue arises because those who don't contribute still benefit, undermining cooperation. Publishing donation information, when handled correctly, can foster cooperation by making individuals aware of how their contributions compare to others, leveraging social dynamics to encourage participation.

2

What roles do indirect reciprocity and 'Face (Mianzi)' play in community participation?

Indirect reciprocity is a system where individuals make decisions based on image score, reputation, and personal image. This system affects how individuals behave. Also Face (Mianzi) is another important aspect of behavior to consider because face defines behavior and influences social communications. Therefore Individual self-assessment is an important factor for participating in the community.

3

What key factors influence an individual's self-assessment when donation information is shared in a community?

The sharing of donation information affects individual self-assessment, which in turn influences their behavior. Several elements impact this self-assessment, including the openness and familiarity of the situation, the evaluation ability of the audience, and interpersonal relationships. These factors collectively determine how individuals perceive their contributions and adjust their behavior accordingly.

4

How does gossip function as a social control mechanism in the context of donation transparency and community cooperation?

Gossip is an important way to transfer social information. As such, it functions as an efficient social control mechanism. Verbal communication influences self-assessment after the list is published, which in turn affects behavior. Decision-makers goal is to identify effective ways to promote cooperation through transparency.

5

How does incomplete transparency, like setting a threshold based on the mean of past donations, promote community cooperation and benefit public goods projects?

Publishing donation information incompletely promotes cooperation, leading to a more harmonious community. For instance, if decision-makers analyze the mean of the previous donations and use this as the threshold for public recognition, it simplifies the decision and increases individual participation. By following a well-constructed method, participation in the community increases. Decision-makers can use this participation increase to invest in new public goods projects.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.