Illustration of leg straightening after knee osteotomy surgery

Straightening the Curve: Can a Simple Osteotomy Fix Genu Valgum?

"Discover how a lateral open-wedge distal femoral osteotomy can correct genu valgum, improve knee function, and potentially enhance patella stability without needing bone grafts."


Osteotomies around the knee serve as a well-established solution for addressing varus and valgus malalignment in the lower extremity. These procedures work by shifting the mechanical axis, transferring weight from a damaged compartment to a healthier one. In cases where symptoms are absent, knee osteotomies can also restore a more natural mechanical axis, which helps to prevent further joint damage.

The type of corrective osteotomy performed—whether on the proximal tibia or distal femur—depends on the origin of the deformity, as determined by a malalignment test. For valgus malalignment cases with a reduced mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), a distal femur osteotomy using an opening wedge technique is often employed.

While the open-wedge technique is commonly used for tibial correction of varus deformities, its application in femoral corrections has been a subject of debate. However, a new study analyzes the outcomes of patients treated with lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO), focusing on bone healing without grafting and considering the impact of patient age. This article unpacks the key findings of this research for you.

LOWDFO: A Reliable Solution Without Bone Grafting?

Illustration of leg straightening after knee osteotomy surgery

The study retrospectively analyzed twenty-two consecutive patients with genu valgum. These patients underwent twenty-three LOWDFOs using a Tomofix-locking plate. The average patient age was 23.7 years. Researchers evaluated clinical outcomes using pre- and post-operative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) and radiographic assessments, including mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), leg length discrepancy (LLD), bone healing, and patella parameters.

The results indicated that restoration of MAD and mLDFA led to significantly improved post-operative KOOS5 scores in both younger and older patients (p = 0.001). Importantly, bone healing was reliable in all patients, even without bone grafting. The procedure also resulted in a significant increase in leg length post-operatively (p = 0.001) and improved patella height, as indicated by a reduced Blackburne-Peel ratio (p < 0.001).

  • Improved Knee Function: Significant improvements were observed in KOOS scores, indicating better overall knee function.
  • Reliable Bone Healing: Bone grafting wasn't necessary for reliable bone healing, simplifying the procedure.
  • Leg Length Correction: The surgery led to a measurable increase in leg length, which can be beneficial for patients with discrepancies.
  • Patella Stability: Changes in the Blackburne-Peel ratio suggest potential for increased patella stability.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Outcomes and Trade-offs in Distal Femoral Osteotomy

An updated review reports that three authors used the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), with mean scores improving by 16.7 points, from 60 to 76.5. A biomechanical study focused on hinge fractures after varisation distal femoral osteotomies and identifies malunion of the osteotomy gap and hinge fractures as major concerns for both techniques. A separate report says closing-wedge osteotomy provides correction without an osteotomy gap, compared with opening-wedge techniques. A 2025 retrospective study evaluated medial closing-wedge osteotomy with a paediatric locking plate in 25 adolescents (36 knees), whose mean age was 12.74 years.

Limits in the Evidence

A study of lateral open-wedge distal femoral varus osteotomy without bone grafting identifies its retrospective design as a limitation. It also reports a limited cohort size, particularly in the subgroup treated with bone grafting and among older patients. These limitations constrain how broadly the study’s findings can be applied.

These findings suggest that LOWDFO without bone grafting is a reliable and promising treatment option, especially for younger patients with genu valgum. Beyond correcting the mechanical axis deviation, the procedure offers the potential for leg length increase and improved patella stability.

LOWDFO: A Promising Solution for Genu Valgum

The study's findings support the use of lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) without bone grafting as a safe and effective method for correcting genu valgum, especially in younger patients. The procedure not only improves knee alignment and function but also offers potential benefits in terms of leg length correction and patella stability.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

No Single Osteotomy Has Emerged as Best

The available sources describe several approaches to genu valgum correction, including supracondylar femoral osteotomy and high tibial osteotomy, selected according to the deformity’s location and severity. One report notes satisfactory outcomes after supracondylar osteotomies, while another says that none of the reported open- and closed-wedge distal femoral techniques has proved best. A report on V osteotomy describes it as a rarely reported, wedgeless procedure and notes only a few case series, including 167 cases of isolated distal femur V osteotomy in young patients under 25 in the literature it reviewed.

The Search for an Accepted Technique

A review of corrective osteotomies for genu valgum arising from the distal femur lists lateral opening-wedge, medial closing-wedge, dome, wedgeless spike, and V osteotomies. It describes few advantages of one technique over another and reports that there remains a dilemma about which osteotomy is most accepted. The source therefore points to an unresolved choice among established approaches rather than a settled preferred procedure.

Correction and Fixation Matter

A source on distal femur translation for genu valgum reports that distal femoral osteotomy can effectively treat disabling deformity when correction is complete and osteosynthesis is effective. It also describes medial distal femoral osteotomy combined with interlocking nailing as an effective approach for knee osteoarthritis with valgus deformity. These observations link the reported effectiveness to both the adequacy of correction and the fixation method.

Care Depends on the Person and the Case

A case study on severe genu valgum reports that rapid physical therapy helped achieve functional goals; it also identifies idiopathy as the most common cause and notes that genu valgum is widespread in underdeveloped and third-world countries. A case report of a 32-year-old active male with severe bilateral genu valgum describes reliable healing without bone grafting after step-cut rotational distal femoral osteotomy and says the procedure prolonged the need for knee arthroplasty. Another source recommends assessing the cause through careful history, physical examination, and appropriate imaging, and lists options for persistent genu valgum ranging from lifestyle modification, NSAIDs, bracing, and physiotherapy.

While the study acknowledges limitations such as its retrospective design and limited sample size, the results provide valuable insights for orthopedic surgeons and patients considering treatment options for genu valgum.

Further research with larger cohorts and prospective designs is encouraged to validate these findings and explore the long-term outcomes of LOWDFO without bone grafting.

Observational study (level 4 of 8)

This observational retrospective cohort describes outcomes in patients who received lateral open-wedge distal femoral osteotomy; it can show what was observed in this group, but cannot establish that the procedure caused the changes or would produce the same results in other groups.[1] [2]

How much alignment and length changed

  • 7.9 mmA mean wedge opening of 9 mm accompanied a mean leg-length increase of 7.9 mm. The length gain was smaller than the opening height, rather than matching it millimetre for millimetre.[1]

What the combined findings suggest

Taken together, the reported alignment shifts and improved KOOS subscales indicate that radiographic correction coincided with better reported knee function in this cohort; the study does not isolate which change produced the other.[1]

Reliable healing without grafting and uncommon complications make the approach promising in this group, but the findings do not establish a comparative safety advantage over other techniques.[1] [2]

The patella measure moved toward more normal values, but this radiographic change alone does not establish fewer episodes of patellar dislocation.[2] [3]

Where this cohort leaves uncertainty

  • The authors identify the small cohort and limited older-patient subgroup as constraints on how broadly the findings apply.[1]
  • The authors could not directly compare their findings with medial closing-wedge surgery in young patients because evidence for that group was limited.[1]

Lateral open-wedge distal femoral osteotomy without grafting: a retrospective cohort

Study designObservational study[2]
Main outcomeClinical and radiographic outcomes, including KOOS scores and bone healing without grafting[2]
p-valuep = 0.001[2]
Times cited27[2]

How later work frames the technique

A later review describes lateral opening wedge as one method used to restore the desired axis, while noting that reported knee outcomes did not specify patellar-dislocation recurrence rates. This places the patella finding here as a measured parameter, not proof that dislocations were prevented.[3]

Later biomechanical work identifies hinge fractures and malunion as concerns across both wedge techniques, and suggests angular-stable plates could reduce associated problems; it does not establish that those issues occurred in this cohort.[4]

A separate clinical report emphasizes that closing-wedge correction avoids an osteotomy gap, unlike opening-wedge correction. That is a technical contrast, not evidence in these excerpts that one method produces better patient outcomes.[5]

Questions the findings leave open

  • Would the functional and healing results remain similar in a larger group, especially among older patients?[1]
  • How do outcomes in young patients compare directly between lateral opening-wedge and medial closing-wedge procedures?[1]

Radiographic terms in this study

mLDFA
Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1007/s00264-018-4216-0, Alternate LINK

Title: Distal Femoral Varus Osteotomy: Results Of The Lateral Open-Wedge Technique Without Bone Grafting

Subject: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Journal: International Orthopaedics

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Authors: Alexander Kolb, Verena Isak, Gerhard M. Hobusch, Catharina Chiari, Reinhard Windhager

Published: 2018-11-13

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO)?

The lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) is a surgical procedure designed to correct genu valgum, commonly known as knock-knee. This involves making a precise cut in the distal femur (the lower part of the thigh bone) and opening it up on the lateral (outer) side to realign the leg. The procedure aims to restore the mechanical axis of the leg, which is the line of force transmission through the knee, improving overall knee function and potentially preventing further joint damage.

2

Why is lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) important?

The significance of lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) lies in its ability to correct genu valgum, which is a common malalignment that can lead to knee pain, instability, and premature osteoarthritis. The study emphasizes the use of LOWDFO without bone grafting. It's particularly important because it offers a less invasive approach while still achieving reliable bone healing. This treatment is especially beneficial for younger patients as it addresses the malalignment and improves the overall knee function and patella stability, leading to enhanced long-term joint health.

3

What are the implications of having a lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO)?

The implications of undergoing lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) are multifaceted. The procedure directly improves knee function, as evidenced by improved Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS). It also corrects the mechanical axis deviation (MAD) and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) improving leg alignment. Furthermore, the procedure can lead to increased leg length post-operatively and enhanced patella stability. By addressing these aspects, LOWDFO reduces pain, improves mobility, and potentially delays the onset of osteoarthritis, contributing to a better quality of life for the patient.

4

What did the study analyze in relation to lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO)?

The study analyzed the outcomes of patients treated with lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO). The study focused on a group of twenty-two consecutive patients with genu valgum who underwent twenty-three LOWDFOs. Researchers evaluated clinical outcomes using pre- and post-operative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) and radiographic assessments, including mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), leg length discrepancy (LLD), bone healing, and patella parameters. These findings show that LOWDFO without bone grafting is a reliable and promising treatment option, especially for younger patients with genu valgum.

5

What were the main conclusions of the study regarding lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO)?

The study's findings support the use of lateral opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LOWDFO) without bone grafting as a safe and effective method for correcting genu valgum, especially in younger patients. The procedure not only improves knee alignment and function but also offers potential benefits in terms of leg length correction and patella stability. The study also emphasizes that the bone healing was reliable in all patients, even without bone grafting, and that the restoration of MAD and mLDFA led to significantly improved post-operative KOOS scores in both younger and older patients.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.