Lotus flower emerging from stormy sea, symbolizing hope and resilience in the face of stage IV breast cancer.

Stage IV Breast Cancer: Can Surgery Improve Survival?

"New research suggests locoregional treatment may offer hope for Chinese women with de novo stage IV breast cancer."


Breast cancer remains a significant health challenge for women worldwide. While advancements in chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and endocrine treatments have extended survival for those with stage IV disease (where the cancer has already spread to other parts of the body at diagnosis), the optimal treatment approach remains a subject of ongoing research. Traditionally, systemic therapies have been the cornerstone of care, but recent studies are exploring the role of local treatments like surgery and radiotherapy.

Approximately 5-10% of patients discover they have stage IV breast cancer when they are first diagnosed. For these individuals, the median survival time has historically been limited to 18-24 months. However, innovations continue, aiming to improve both longevity and quality of life.

Now, a retrospective study focuses specifically on Chinese women with de novo stage IV breast cancer, investigating whether locoregional treatment—surgery to remove the primary tumor and/or radiotherapy—can make a difference in their prognosis. The study seeks to determine if these local interventions, in addition to standard systemic therapies, can offer a survival advantage.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

The Current Burden

The CDC reports that 288,494 new breast cancers were diagnosed in females in the United States in 2023, while 43,402 females died from breast cancer in 2024. The CDC also notes that females had much higher rates of breast cancer diagnosis than death from the disease. Federal resources, including the Female Breast Cancer Stat Bite and SEER*Explorer, provide data on incidence, deaths, stage distribution, and five-year relative survival. The National Breast Cancer Foundation estimates that 168,000 U.S. survivors are living with Stage 4 metastatic breast cancer and that 42,140 U.S. women will die from breast cancer in 2026.

Treatment Selection in Stage IV Disease

In stage IV breast cancer, systemic treatment remains central, while the role of surgery is selective and continues to be studied. Reviews have reported that multiple studies suggest resection of the primary tumor may improve survival, but the relationship between surgery and tumor molecular subtype in the era of targeted therapy remains uncertain. Surgical resection of the primary tumor should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team for selected patients who respond to systemic therapy and may achieve no evidence of disease. Research has also examined surgical removal of metastatic sites compared with radiation, including their association with overall survival.

From Ancient Descriptions to Surgery

Breast cancer has been recognized for centuries, including in descriptions associated with the Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus. Hippocrates and Galen attributed illness to an excess of black bile, and treatments such as opium and castor oil remained part of historical approaches. Surgical resection of breast cancer was introduced in the 18th century. Modern accounts of the field describe a long evolution from these early theories toward genetic markers and precision medicine.

Does Removing the Primary Tumor Help?

Lotus flower emerging from stormy sea, symbolizing hope and resilience in the face of stage IV breast cancer.

The study, published in Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, retrospectively analyzed data from 157 Chinese women diagnosed with de novo stage IV breast cancer between 2001 and 2016. Researchers at the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College divided participants into two groups: those who underwent surgery to remove the primary breast tumor and those who did not. They then compared overall survival (OS) and distant progression-free survival (DPFS) between the groups.

Key findings from the study:

  • Surgery Linked to Improved Survival: Patients in the surgery group demonstrated longer 5-year overall survival and 5-year distant progression-free survival compared to those who did not undergo surgery.
  • Radiotherapy Also Beneficial: Distant progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients who received locoregional radiotherapy.
  • Factors Associated with Survival: Response to systemic therapy and surgical treatment were both independently associated with improved survival outcomes.
  • Progesterone Receptor Status Matters: Multivariate analysis revealed that progestogen receptor status significantly influenced distant progression-free survival.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

An Evolving Evidence Base

Research on surgery for stage IV breast cancer remains an evolving area rather than a settled question. Current discussions generally focus on which patients might benefit from removing the primary tumor or selected metastatic sites after systemic treatment. Because outcomes may depend on disease biology, treatment response, and the distribution of metastases, findings from one patient group may not apply to all patients. Decisions therefore require individualized clinical judgment and multidisciplinary review.

Why Surgery May Not Help Everyone

Surgery may not improve outcomes for every person with stage IV breast cancer because metastatic disease can involve cancer cells beyond the sites that can be removed. An operation can also impose recovery demands and other risks while systemic disease remains active. Evidence may be difficult to interpret because patients selected for surgery can differ from those who are not selected in disease burden, treatment response, and overall health. These limitations make it inappropriate to treat surgery as a universal standard.

Stage IV Requires a Different Framework

The National Cancer Institute identifies breast cancer stage as an important factor in determining which treatment may work best. Comparisons of stage III and stage IV disease have examined overall survival using both established American Joint Committee on Cancer classifications and proposed subgroups for de novo metastatic breast cancer. Stage IV treatment discussions also emphasize symptom management and quality of life alongside disease control. Thus, surgery in stage IV disease should not be evaluated using the same framework applied to earlier-stage breast cancer.

These results suggest that locoregional surgery and radiotherapy of the primary tumor may offer a benefit for Chinese patients diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer. Surgical resection could be considered for selected patients.

What Does This Mean for Breast Cancer Treatment?

This study adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that, in some cases, local treatment of the primary tumor can improve outcomes for patients with stage IV breast cancer. While the study is limited by its retrospective nature and specific focus on a Chinese population, it highlights the potential importance of carefully considering locoregional approaches in treatment planning.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Biology Matters Alongside Anatomy

Anatomic extent remains important in classifying breast cancer, but biological subtype is described as a defining feature for predicting overall prognosis. This supports a more individualized interpretation of stage IV disease than anatomy alone can provide. A Dana-Farber Cancer Institute study reported that stage IV breast cancer has increased in both incidence and proportion among breast cancer diagnoses over the last decade. Global research has likewise examined how stage at diagnosis varies by country, age group, calendar period, and socioeconomic status.

Personalized Questions for Future Research

Future research may clarify which people with stage IV breast cancer are most likely to benefit from surgery in addition to systemic treatment. Important questions include how tumor biology, treatment response, metastatic distribution, and patient priorities should influence selection. Better evidence could help distinguish operations that improve meaningful outcomes from those that add burden without sufficient benefit. Until then, treatment decisions are likely to remain individualized and multidisciplinary.

The Wider Burden of Metastatic Disease

Stage IV breast cancer carries substantial physical, psychosocial, and financial burdens across the cancer care continuum. A JAMA Network Open report argues that adults with advanced cancer should receive greater support throughout that continuum. Metastatic breast cancer affects millions of people globally and accounts for the vast majority of breast cancer deaths, according to the Health Policy Partnership overview. That overview also reports considerably poorer outcomes for metastatic disease than for breast cancer detected at an early stage.

Living With Ongoing Treatment

For people living with stage IV breast cancer, treatment decisions involve more than survival estimates alone. Symptoms, treatment effects, emotional strain, financial pressures, and personal goals can all shape what care feels acceptable and worthwhile. A patient-centered discussion should therefore address quality of life as well as disease control. The value of surgery may differ from one person to another depending on these priorities and the expected clinical benefit.

The researchers emphasize that surgical resection should be reserved for carefully selected patients – those with a lower disease burden, a good response to systemic treatment, and a desire to manage potential local complications. More randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and better define the optimal role of surgery and radiotherapy in stage IV breast cancer management.

Ultimately, the goal is to personalize treatment strategies, incorporating both systemic and local therapies to maximize survival and quality of life for all individuals facing this challenging diagnosis. Further research into genetic factors might also play a vital role in future treatments.

How much weight this Chinese cohort can carry

Observational study (level 4 of 8)

This was an observational, retrospective study of Chinese patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, so it can show associations between treatment groups and outcomes, but cannot establish that treatment caused the differences.[1]

Treatment groups and follow-up in the study

  • 3 to 180 months; median 54.5 months monthsFollow-up ranged from 3 to 180 months, with a median of 54.5 months; these describe the observation period, not survival gains attributable to treatment.[1]

What the Chinese hospital study examined

Study designObservational study[1]
PopulationChinese patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer[1]
Sample size157 patients[1]
SettingNational Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences[1]
DurationJanuary 1, 2001, to December 31, 2016[1]
Comparisonsurgery and nonsurgery groups[1]
Main outcomeOverall survival (OS) and distant progression-free survival (DPFS)[1]
Times cited4[1]

How later work places this result

That contrast places the Chinese cohort’s favorable surgery-group comparison within a mixed evidence base: retrospective comparisons can show an association, while randomized-trial evidence may not show a survival benefit.[1] [2] [3]

What a follow-up study would need to clarify

  • Would the radiotherapy association with distant progression-free survival correspond to an overall-survival difference in a comparable population?[1] [4]
  • How well do results from this Chinese cohort apply to patients treated in other settings or populations?[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1159/000488643, Alternate LINK

Title: Impact Of Locoregional Treatment On Prognosis Of De Novo Stage Iv Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Long-Term Study Of Chinese Population

Subject: Obstetrics and Gynecology

Journal: Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

Publisher: S. Karger AG

Authors: Wenyan Wang, Jiaqi Liu, Jie Wang, Jidong Gao, Xiang Wang, Xin Wang

Published: 2018-11-16

Everything You Need To Know

1

Can surgery improve survival in stage IV breast cancer?

In certain instances of stage IV breast cancer, particularly de novo cases (where it's diagnosed at stage IV), removing the primary breast tumor through surgery may offer a survival advantage. A retrospective study focusing on Chinese women with de novo stage IV breast cancer revealed that patients who underwent surgery had longer 5-year overall survival and 5-year distant progression-free survival. However, it's crucial to note that patient selection is critical, and this approach might not be suitable for everyone.

2

Does radiotherapy play a role in treating stage IV breast cancer?

Locoregional radiotherapy, which targets the primary tumor site and surrounding areas, may improve outcomes for individuals with stage IV breast cancer. The research indicated that distant progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients who received locoregional radiotherapy. This suggests that combining local treatment with systemic therapies could potentially delay disease progression.

3

What factors influence survival in stage IV breast cancer?

Several factors appear to influence survival outcomes in stage IV breast cancer. Response to systemic therapy and surgical treatment were both independently associated with improved survival outcomes. Additionally, progestogen receptor status played a significant role in distant progression-free survival, according to multivariate analysis. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment approaches based on individual patient characteristics.

4

Are these findings applicable to all women with stage IV breast cancer?

The study specifically focused on Chinese women diagnosed with de novo stage IV breast cancer. This means the results might not be directly applicable to other populations or individuals with different genetic backgrounds. While the findings offer valuable insights, further research is needed to validate these results in diverse populations and understand the underlying biological mechanisms.

5

What are the implications of this research for breast cancer treatment approaches?

This research suggests a potential shift in the treatment paradigm for stage IV breast cancer, where local treatments like surgery and radiotherapy are traditionally less emphasized compared to systemic therapies. The findings support the idea that, in selected patients, integrating locoregional approaches with standard systemic treatments could lead to improved survival outcomes. However, treatment decisions should be individualized and made in consultation with a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.