Healthy river flowing through farmland with data visualizations, contrasting with a polluted stream.

Revitalize Our Rivers: Unveiling the Secrets to Cleaner Waterways

Theo Raines in Climate & Environment August 2025 • 4 min read.

"Dive into a 20-year study on nutrient transport in the Mississippi River Basin and discover practical strategies for safeguarding our water quality. Learn how long-term agroecosystem research reveals the key to reversing pollution and restoring aquatic health."

For decades, nitrogen and phosphorus pollution has cast a long shadow over our water resources, threatening drinking water, harming aquatic ecosystems, and fueling the infamous hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico. The Mississippi River Basin (MRB), a vital artery of American agriculture, contributes significantly to this problem. Grain crop and livestock production account for 70% of the N and P transported within the basin, making it crucial to understand and address this source.

Recognizing the urgent need for action, researchers and policymakers have been working tirelessly to identify the most effective strategies for mitigating nutrient pollution. Within the MRB, the Salt River Basin (SRB) stands out as an area with particularly high phosphorus transport and intermediate nitrogen transport, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.

Enter the Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW), a dedicated research site established in 1991 to unravel the complexities of nutrient transport in agricultural landscapes. For two decades, scientists have meticulously monitored nutrient concentrations at various scales, from individual plots to entire watersheds, generating a wealth of data and valuable insights into the factors driving water quality.

Decades of Dedication: Unearthing the Data Goldmine

Healthy river flowing through farmland with data visualizations, contrasting with a polluted stream.

The Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) study meticulously collected data from 1991 to 2010, tracking nutrient concentrations at plot, field, and watershed scales. This data is now accessible through the Sustaining the Earth's Watersheds-Agricultural Research Data System (STEWARDS), providing a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers. These findings are complemented by data sets from broader regional studies and cave stream monitoring, offering a comprehensive view of nutrient dynamics across diverse environments.

Throughout the 20-year study period, analytical methods for measuring nitrogen and phosphorus species in water samples remained consistent. Researchers employed automated colorimetry using flow injection or discrete analyzers to determine dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus forms. Quality assurance measures included rigorous duplicate, spike, and blank samples to ensure data reliability.

Significant analytical consistencies were present over the 20-year study:

Consistent Methods: Automated colorimetry techniques maintained over the study duration for accuracy.
Stringent QA: Inclusion of duplicate, spike, and blank samples ensured high data reliability.
Multiple Instruments: Use of Technicon, Lachat QuikChem, and Konelab Aquakem analyzers to enhance sample throughput and reduce waste.
Data Accessibility: Public access to data via STEWARDS promotes transparency and further research.

The long-term research at the GCEW and surrounding areas has yielded critical findings about nutrient transport in agricultural watersheds. Stream nutrient concentrations often reached levels associated with nuisance algal growth and reduced aquatic invertebrate diversity, signaling ecological stress. Fertilizer management practices emerged as key levers for reducing nutrient transport in runoff. Despite the presence of claypan soils, nitrate leaching remained a significant pathway for nitrogen loss, leading to groundwater contamination when fertilizer and manure inputs exceeded crop requirements. The most vulnerable areas for nutrient, sediment, and herbicide transport were field locations that had the poorest crop growth.

Turning Knowledge into Action: A Path Forward

The wealth of data and insights generated by long-term agroecosystem research provides a solid foundation for developing targeted and effective strategies to mitigate nutrient pollution. By embracing sustainable agricultural practices, optimizing fertilizer management, and focusing on soil health, we can revitalize our rivers and create a cleaner, healthier environment for future generations.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.2134/jeq2013.12.0518, Alternate LINK

Title: Long-Term Agroecosystem Research In The Central Mississippi River Basin: Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed And Regional Nutrient Water Quality Data

Subject: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Journal: Journal of Environmental Quality

Publisher: Wiley

Authors: R. N. Lerch, N. R. Kitchen, C. Baffaut, E. D. Vories

Published: 2015-01-01

Everything You Need To Know

What is the primary source of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in the Mississippi River Basin (MRB) and what are the environmental consequences?

The Mississippi River Basin (MRB) is significantly impacted by nitrogen and phosphorus pollution, primarily stemming from grain crop and livestock production, which accounts for 70% of the N and P transported within the basin. This pollution threatens drinking water, harms aquatic ecosystems, and contributes to the hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico. Addressing this issue requires targeted strategies, particularly in areas like the Salt River Basin (SRB), known for high phosphorus transport.

What data was collected by the Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) study and where can this data be accessed?

The Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) study, conducted from 1991 to 2010, meticulously tracked nutrient concentrations at various scales. The data collected is accessible through the Sustaining the Earth's Watersheds-Agricultural Research Data System (STEWARDS). Analytical methods remained consistent throughout the study, employing automated colorimetry with rigorous quality assurance measures to ensure data reliability. This long-term research has yielded critical findings about nutrient transport in agricultural watersheds.

What were the key findings from the Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) study regarding nutrient transport and its impact on water quality?

The long-term research at the Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) revealed that stream nutrient concentrations often reached levels associated with nuisance algal growth and reduced aquatic invertebrate diversity, signaling ecological stress. Fertilizer management practices emerged as key levers for reducing nutrient transport in runoff. Additionally, nitrate leaching remained a significant pathway for nitrogen loss, leading to groundwater contamination when fertilizer and manure inputs exceeded crop requirements. The most vulnerable areas for nutrient transport were field locations that had the poorest crop growth.

What analytical methods were used in the Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) study to measure nitrogen and phosphorus levels, and what quality assurance measures were in place?

The GCEW study employed automated colorimetry using flow injection or discrete analyzers to measure dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus forms. These methods included the use of Technicon, Lachat QuikChem, and Konelab Aquakem analyzers to enhance sample throughput and reduce waste. Rigorous quality assurance measures, such as duplicate, spike, and blank samples, were implemented to ensure data reliability throughout the 20-year study. This consistent methodology allows for accurate comparisons of nutrient levels over time.

How can the knowledge gained from long-term agroecosystem research, like the Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) study, be applied to reduce nutrient pollution in our waterways?

The data and insights generated by long-term agroecosystem research, such as the Goodwater Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) study, provide a solid foundation for developing targeted and effective strategies to mitigate nutrient pollution. By embracing sustainable agricultural practices, optimizing fertilizer management, and focusing on soil health, we can revitalize our rivers and create a cleaner, healthier environment for future generations. Focusing on areas with poor crop growth and high fertilizer use is essential for reducing nutrient runoff.