Diverse communities collaboratively shaping a luminous cityscape, symbolizing empowerment and the right to the city.

Reclaiming Our Cities: How the 'Right to the City' Movement is Shaping Urban Futures

"Explore the legal and sociological perspectives on the 'right to the city' and how it's empowering communities to shape their urban environments."


The concept of the “right to the city” emerged from a desire to transform not just economic structures, but the very power dynamics shaping our urban environments. This idea, championed by Henri Lefebvre in the late 1960s, coincided with widespread student protests and a growing awareness of social inequalities. It wasn't just about class struggle, but about reclaiming the power to shape our surroundings.

In Brazil, the “right to the city” took on a unique character. During the military dictatorship, the concept was embraced by social movements, who used it to fight for basic rights like housing, transportation, and security while advocating for democratic participation. This evolved into a recognized principle within the Federal Constitution of 1988, specifically addressing urban policy.

Today, the “right to the city” is often interpreted as a broad collection of social rights aimed at improving the quality of life for urban residents. But, some experts warn that this approach can dilute the concept, turning it into an empty promise if it's not carefully defined and defended.

The Evolution of an Idea: From Utopia to Social Practice

Diverse communities collaboratively shaping a luminous cityscape, symbolizing empowerment and the right to the city.

The academic exploration of the “right to the city” can be traced through two distinct paths, according to Tavolari (2016). One path follows Lefebvre’s original vision, which emphasizes a radical, utopian transformation aimed at eradicating the “urban misery” produced by capitalist urbanization. The other, led by Manuel Castells, focuses on urban social practices geared towards achieving social rights and building citizenship.

Lefebvre argued that capitalism reduces urban spaces to mere commodities, prioritizing exchange value over use value. He envisioned a revolution that would replace this instrumental urban rationality with a political one, allowing citizens to participate fully in the creation and experience of urban life.
Key stages in Lefebvre's analysis of urban development:
  • Political City: Organized around influence over rural areas.
  • Commercial City: Centered on trade and the accumulation of wealth.
  • Industrial City: Driven by capitalist production and information control.
  • City in Crisis: Characterized by inadequate housing, disconnected suburbs, and environmental degradation.
Castells critiqued Lefebvre's focus on urban form as a philosophical category, arguing that it obscures the social contradictions that drive urban struggles. He maintained that political action, centered on the state, is essential for achieving urban development goals.

Reclaiming the Urban Narrative

By embracing a legal and sociological perspective, the 'right to the city' can become a powerful tool for social change. It enables legal systems to adapt and respond to the evolving needs and demands of urban populations. By acknowledging these rights, we can foster more inclusive and democratic urban environments where all voices are heard and valued.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.