A surreal illustration showing the choices facing students in a neoliberal education system.

Neoliberalism's Impact on Education: Navigating Dilemmas and Charting New Possibilities

"Exploring the challenges and opportunities in education amidst neoliberal policies and seeking a path towards an emancipated society."


The late 20th and early 21st centuries have witnessed significant transformations in capitalism, prompting a re-evaluation of its current phase. These changes, however, do not alter the fundamental nature of capitalism or its inherent predatory characteristics.

Capitalism's civilizing shortcomings and recurring upheavals are not new. The present crisis mirrors past crises, albeit with unique nuances and equally devastating effects. The economic 'depression' of the 19th century, from 1873 to 1895, coincided with extensive colonial expansion and capital investment abroad, strategies employed to boost profit rates. Colonies in Africa and Asia, along with expanded markets under imperialist control, offered avenues for capital accumulation. However, fierce competition led to the carnage of World War I.

Crises within the capitalist system tend towards internationalization, transcending localized issues and affecting capitalist countries collectively. The North American crisis of 1929, for instance, engulfed the entire capitalist world, highlighting the high degree of interdependence within the global economy.

How Neoliberalism Reshaped Education

A surreal illustration showing the choices facing students in a neoliberal education system.

The response to the economic collapse involved Keynesianism, which gained traction after World War II. While the post-war period saw rapid growth, it faced challenges in the early 1970s. The oil crisis, coupled with reduced economic growth and inflationary pressures, fueled the rise of neoliberal ideology.

The breakdown of Fordist/Taylorist accumulation led capital to seek profit recovery strategies through neoliberal policies. These policies viewed the state and its social programs as hindrances to economic growth. Intellectuals advocating neoliberalism argued that state spending on public policies and the power of unions undermined corporate profitability. To manage its structural crisis, capital initiated a restructuring process affecting its legal and ideological systems of domination. The proposed alternative centered on a 'minimal state,' limiting public power in social matters while strengthening control over public spending and weakening unions. This involved deregulation of labor rights and dismantling the state's productive sector.

  • From a neoliberal perspective, monetary stability became the primary objective of any government.
  • Fiscal reforms, including reduced taxes on capital, were deemed essential to stimulate economic recovery.
  • Capitalism's response to its structural crisis involved replacing the Fordist industrial model and the Keynesian political-economic model with a flexible accumulation regime. This strengthened financial and speculative capital during the collapse of 'real socialism,' reinforcing the idea that liberalism and market economies had triumphed absolutely.
  • The oppression of labor increased significantly as private appropriation of collective goods like land, education, and health accelerated.
István Mészáros noted that the realm of capital approaches its absolute limits due to its increasing inability to resolve internal contradictions, leading to a global structural crisis of capital. All categories of workers were affected by this restructuring, including intellectual workers, teachers, and other wage earners. Consequently, capitalism increasingly focused on the educational sector, viewing it as strategic for legitimizing the existing order and regulating it according to market needs.

Charting a Course Forward

The material conditions that heavily favor capital necessitate a renewed ethical commitment to reflect on conquering spaces in the service of struggle for order's overcoming. From a practical point of view, it’s about fighting for the conquest of trenches in the struggle to lower education from popular layers. In other words, it is important to strengthen a counter-hegemonic project. Project is at the service of the 'class that lives on work', but not the market and the profit of business institutions. Therefore, we cannot assume a defeatist perspective and lose the notion of the transforming dimension of history. We understand that a qualitative overcoming of the current level of development of humanity is possible, as well as encouragement. In other words, human emancipation is a possibility, as well as barbarism. History is an open game. We can only play.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.4025/actascieduc.v34i2.16978, Alternate LINK

Title: A Educação Em Tempos De Neoliberalismo: Dilemas E Possibilidades

Subject: Education

Journal: Acta Scientiarum. Education

Publisher: Universidade Estadual de Maringa

Authors: Marco Antonio De Oliveira Gomes, Maria Lilia Imbiriba Sousa Colares

Published: 2012-11-14

Everything You Need To Know

1

How do neoliberal policies view the role of the state and social programs, and what alternatives do they propose for economic recovery?

Neoliberal policies, driven by the goal of profit recovery, view the state and its social programs as obstacles to economic growth. These policies advocate for a 'minimal state' with reduced public power in social matters, deregulation of labor rights, and dismantling of the state's productive sector. Monetary stability and fiscal reforms, such as reduced taxes on capital, are prioritized to stimulate economic recovery. This approach contrasts with Keynesianism, which gained traction after World War II.

2

What were the key changes in economic models that led to increased oppression of labor, and how did this affect collective goods?

The shift from the Fordist industrial model and the Keynesian political-economic model to a flexible accumulation regime strengthened financial and speculative capital. This transition occurred during the collapse of 'real socialism,' reinforcing the idea that liberalism and market economies had triumphed. As a result, the oppression of labor increased due to the private appropriation of collective goods like land, education, and health.

3

According to István Mészáros, what are the limits of capital and how does this relate to the educational sector?

István Mészáros argued that capital is approaching its absolute limits due to its increasing inability to resolve internal contradictions. This leads to a global structural crisis of capital, affecting all categories of workers, including intellectual workers, teachers, and other wage earners. Consequently, capitalism increasingly focuses on the educational sector, viewing it as strategic for legitimizing the existing order and regulating it according to market needs.

4

What strategies can be employed to counter the influence of capital and promote a counter-hegemonic project in education?

To counter the influence of capital, it is essential to renew an ethical commitment to reflect on conquering spaces in the service of struggle for order's overcoming. Practically, this involves fighting for the conquest of trenches in the struggle to lower education from popular layers. Strengthening a counter-hegemonic project at the service of the 'class that lives on work,' rather than the market and the profit of business institutions, is crucial.

5

Given the current challenges, is a positive transformation of humanity possible, and what role does history play in this?

The current state of affairs does not necessitate a defeatist perspective; it is important to maintain the notion of the transforming dimension of history. A qualitative overcoming of the current level of development of humanity is possible, with human emancipation representing a viable option alongside barbarism. History remains an open game, and our actions will determine the outcome.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.