A person stands at a crossroads, using a dial to adjust different paths representing beliefs, symbolizing nuanced decision-making under uncertainty with RML.

Navigating Uncertainty: How Relative Maximum Likelihood Can Refine Your Beliefs

"Unlock smarter decision-making by updating ambiguous beliefs using Relative Maximum Likelihood and adapt to uncertain situations with flexibility."


In today's rapidly evolving world, making decisions under uncertainty is more critical than ever. We often lack complete information, making it difficult to rely on simple probability calculations. In such situations, decision-makers frequently depend on a range of beliefs, rather than a single perspective, which requires tools that can effectively refine and update these ambiguous beliefs to improve decision making.

Traditional methods for updating beliefs often fall short. Full Bayesian (FB) updating considers all existing beliefs without discarding any, which may lead to including outdated or irrelevant information. On the other hand, Maximum Likelihood (ML) updating discards beliefs that do not align perfectly with observed events, potentially oversimplifying complex situations. These methods, while useful, represent extreme approaches and fail to capture nuanced, real-world scenarios.

To address these limitations, a new approach called Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating has emerged, offering a more flexible and adaptive method for refining ambiguous beliefs. RML integrates aspects of both FB and ML updating, allowing decision-makers to fine-tune their strategies and navigate uncertainty with greater precision. This innovative technique acknowledges the importance of considering multiple perspectives while adapting to new information.

What is Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) and How Does It Work?

A person stands at a crossroads, using a dial to adjust different paths representing beliefs, symbolizing nuanced decision-making under uncertainty with RML.

Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating is a novel approach to refining ambiguous beliefs, particularly when dealing with multiple possibilities or scenarios. Unlike traditional methods that either consider all possibilities equally or discard those that do not precisely fit new data, RML strikes a balance by selectively updating a subset of beliefs. It is designed to linearly adjust from the entire set of beliefs down to those that ascribe the maximum probability to a new event. Developed by Xiaoyu Cheng, RML offers a nuanced way to adapt to new information by combining the principles of Full Bayesian (FB) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) updating.

Here’s how RML works:

  • Initial Beliefs: RML starts with a set of possible beliefs, known as priors (C), representing various perspectives on an uncertain situation.
  • Observed Event: When a new event (E) occurs, RML identifies a subset of these priors that assign the highest probability to the event (C(E)). This subset represents the most likely explanations for what has been observed.
  • Linear Contraction: The core of RML involves a linear contraction, where the initial set of priors (C) is adjusted toward the maximum-likelihood subset (C(E)). This adjustment is controlled by a parameter (α), which ranges from 0 to 1. The equation for this adjustment is: Ca(E) = αC(E) + (1 − α)C Here, α determines the degree to which the decision-maker is willing to discard priors based on their likelihood.
  • Updating Beliefs: Once the subset of priors is determined, Bayes' rule is applied to update each prior conditional on the observed event. Bayes' rule is a fundamental concept in probability theory that describes how to update the probability of a hypothesis based on new evidence.
The flexibility of RML is due to the α parameter. When α = 0, RML is equivalent to Full Bayesian (FB) updating, where all initial priors are considered without any discarding. Conversely, when α = 1, RML mirrors Maximum Likelihood (ML) updating, where only the priors that maximize the likelihood of the observed event are considered. By adjusting α between these extremes, decision-makers can fine-tune how sensitive they are to new information, making RML a versatile tool for various scenarios.

RML: A Path Forward

In an era defined by rapid change and profound uncertainty, the ability to nimbly update and refine beliefs is more than an advantage—it's a necessity. Relative Maximum Likelihood updating provides a robust, flexible framework for navigating this complex landscape, bridging the gap between rigid adherence to existing beliefs and the potentially destabilizing effects of overreacting to new information. Whether in the realms of business, policy, or personal decision-making, RML equips individuals and organizations with a powerful tool for staying ahead in an unpredictable world.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2021.102587,

Title: Relative Maximum Likelihood Updating Of Ambiguous Beliefs

Subject: econ.th

Authors: Xiaoyu Cheng

Published: 06-11-2019

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating?

Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating is a novel approach to refining ambiguous beliefs, particularly when dealing with multiple possibilities or scenarios. It offers a more flexible and adaptive method by integrating aspects of both Full Bayesian (FB) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) updating. It starts with a set of possible beliefs known as priors (C), and when a new event (E) occurs, RML identifies a subset of priors that assign the highest probability to the event (C*(E)). A linear contraction is then used, where the initial set of priors (C) is adjusted toward the maximum-likelihood subset (C*(E)).

2

How does Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating compare to Full Bayesian (FB) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) updating?

Full Bayesian (FB) updating considers all existing beliefs without discarding any, which may lead to including outdated or irrelevant information. Maximum Likelihood (ML) updating discards beliefs that do not align perfectly with observed events, potentially oversimplifying complex situations. Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating strikes a balance between these two extremes. RML uses a parameter (α) to control how the initial beliefs (C) are adjusted toward the maximum-likelihood subset (C*(E)). When α = 0, RML is equivalent to FB updating. When α = 1, RML mirrors ML updating. This allows decision-makers to fine-tune their sensitivity to new information.

3

What role does the parameter (α) play in Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating?

The parameter (α) in Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating is crucial for its flexibility. It determines the degree to which the decision-maker is willing to discard priors based on their likelihood. When α = 0, all initial priors are considered (equivalent to Full Bayesian updating). When α = 1, only the priors that maximize the likelihood of the observed event are considered (equivalent to Maximum Likelihood updating). By adjusting α between 0 and 1, decision-makers can control the influence of new information on their beliefs, making RML a versatile tool.

4

Could you explain the steps involved in Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating?

RML updating involves several key steps: 1. **Initial Beliefs:** Start with a set of possible beliefs, known as priors (C), representing various perspectives on an uncertain situation. 2. **Observed Event:** When a new event (E) occurs, RML identifies a subset of priors that assign the highest probability to the event (C*(E)). This subset represents the most likely explanations for what has been observed. 3. **Linear Contraction:** The initial set of priors (C) is adjusted toward the maximum-likelihood subset (C*(E)) using the equation: Ca(E) = αC*(E) + (1 − α)C, where α is the parameter. 4. **Updating Beliefs:** Bayes' rule is applied to update each prior conditional on the observed event. This step refines the beliefs based on the new evidence.

5

How can Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating be used to improve decision-making under uncertainty?

Relative Maximum Likelihood (RML) updating enhances decision-making under uncertainty by providing a flexible and adaptive framework for refining ambiguous beliefs. By considering multiple perspectives and selectively updating beliefs based on new information, RML allows decision-makers to navigate complex situations with greater precision. It bridges the gap between rigidly adhering to existing beliefs and overreacting to new information, making it a robust tool for staying ahead in an unpredictable world. Whether in business, policy, or personal decision-making, RML equips individuals and organizations with a powerful advantage.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.