Conceptual illustration of healthcare access barriers.

Missed Appointments: Are They a Sign of Deeper Medical Care Disparities?

"New research sheds light on why some patients are more likely to miss critical follow-up care, hindering efforts to improve health outcomes and reduce hospital readmissions."


Ensuring continuous care across different healthcare settings is vital for maintaining high-quality patient outcomes. Transitional care (TC) programs, designed as time-limited, interdisciplinary services, play a crucial role in facilitating the smooth transfer of patients between care levels, aiming to prevent adverse outcomes among at-risk populations.

These TC services are specifically targeted at reducing preventable rehospitalizations (RH) and emergency room (ER) over-utilization, ultimately leading to lower healthcare costs. Over the past decade, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that TC programs, encompassing coordinated care activities, can effectively decrease healthcare expenses, lower rehospitalization rates and ER visits, and improve patient satisfaction.

A recent study highlighted the impact of completing TC follow-up appointments, revealing that patients who attended these appointments experienced fewer ER visits in the year following their discharge, reinforcing the importance of adherence to TC programs. Despite the proven benefits and ongoing innovations in TC, significant gaps persist, particularly concerning patient adherence to initial follow-up appointments after hospitalization.

Unpacking the Reasons Behind Missed Appointments

Conceptual illustration of healthcare access barriers.

Published in the Journal of Hospital Administration in March 6, 2017, a study by Henry Carretta, Seyfullah Tingir, Cara Pappas, and Amy L. Ai, titled “Correlates of keeping post-discharge appointments at a transitional care center: Implications for medical care disparities” investigates the topic of patients that missed appointments. The study addresses the implementation of transitional care (TC) for one of the most vulnerable populations (e.g., middle-aged chronic disease patients with limited health care access). The first round of penalties from the Readmission Reduction Program within the Affordable Care Act showed that hospitals caring for the sickest, poorest, and most vulnerable patients often have exceptionally high RH rates and were more likely to incur such penalties.

Building upon previous research, the study dives deep into factors influencing whether patients, particularly those from vulnerable populations, keep their initial follow-up appointments at transitional care centers. The researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of appointment data from a major regional TC center in Northern Florida, examining records from the center's first three years of operation. With a sample of 2,146 patients referred to the TCC, the study focused on demographic characteristics such as race, ethnicity, and insurance status as predictors of missed appointments.

  • Privately insured patients were more likely to keep their initial appointments.
  • Black patients with public or private insurance were less likely to attend their first appointments.
  • No significant effect was observed for uninsured patients.
  • The study underscores that merely referring patients to appointments is insufficient; healthcare teams must proactively address barriers to attendance.
These findings suggest that an appointment referral is a necessary but not sufficient step for the accomplishment of TC goals. Medical teams need to collaborate with other health professionals, such as social workers, to identify the barriers to keeping appointments and ensure effective solutions for achieving the goal of preventing future ER visits and rehospitalization. Future research could use qualitative interviews with these most vulnerable patients. We speculate that some unmeasured factors in the current study may be predictive of kept versus missed appointments, e.g. social capital, transportation, or time constraints related to family responsibilities or multiple low-wage employment.

Moving Forward: Bridging the Gap in Transitional Care

The study underscores the critical need for a multi-faceted approach to transitional care, one that goes beyond simply scheduling appointments. By proactively addressing social determinants of health and collaborating with various healthcare professionals, we can work towards ensuring equitable access to care and improving health outcomes for all patients. It provides information from a large and complete sample of the first three years of a TC primarily serving an under-investigated population. Linking hospital data to TC appointment data is likely important for understanding the TC population.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are Transitional Care (TC) programs?

Transitional Care (TC) programs are designed as time-limited, interdisciplinary services. They aim to facilitate the smooth transfer of patients between different levels of healthcare. The goal is to prevent adverse outcomes, such as rehospitalizations and emergency room visits, particularly among at-risk populations.

2

Why is ensuring continuous care with Transitional Care (TC) programs important?

Ensuring continuous care through Transitional Care (TC) programs is crucial for maintaining high-quality patient outcomes. When patients transition between care settings, such as from a hospital to home, there's a risk of miscommunication, medication errors, and lack of follow-up. TC programs address these issues by providing coordinated care activities, which can effectively decrease healthcare expenses, lower rehospitalization rates and ER visits, and improve patient satisfaction.

3

What did the study reveal about factors influencing attendance at Transitional Care Centers (TCC)?

The study by Carretta, Tingir, Pappas, and Ai examined factors influencing whether patients, especially those from vulnerable populations, keep their initial follow-up appointments at Transitional Care Centers (TCC). They found that privately insured patients were more likely to attend, while Black patients with public or private insurance were less likely to attend. Uninsured patients did not show a significant difference. These findings suggest that merely referring patients to appointments isn't enough; healthcare teams must proactively address barriers to attendance.

4

What are the implications of the study's findings for healthcare teams regarding Transitional Care (TC)?

The study implies that healthcare teams need to go beyond simply scheduling appointments. They must collaborate with other health professionals, such as social workers, to identify and address the barriers preventing patients from attending their Transitional Care (TC) follow-up appointments. These barriers might include lack of transportation, financial constraints, or family responsibilities. Addressing these social determinants of health is essential for achieving the goal of preventing future ER visits and rehospitalizations.

5

What could future research explore to better understand appointment adherence in Transitional Care (TC)?

Future research could explore unmeasured factors that may predict whether patients keep or miss their Transitional Care (TC) appointments. These factors might include social capital, access to transportation, or time constraints related to family responsibilities or multiple low-wage jobs. Qualitative interviews with vulnerable patients could provide valuable insights into these issues, helping healthcare providers develop more effective interventions.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.