A surreal illustration symbolizing the barriers and opportunities faced by young adults in the housing and job markets.

Locked Out: Are Job Protections and Housing Rules Blocking Young Adults' Success?

Author's portrait.
Nico Varela in Business & Economy August 2025 • 4 min read.

"Digging into how employment laws and housing regulations may be unintentionally hindering young Europeans."


Young Europeans often face a tough combination of high unemployment, unstable jobs, and difficulty leaving their parents' homes. It's easy to point fingers at labor and housing market rules, but the reality is more complicated. Many believe that loosening job protection laws and easing housing regulations would boost the economy and create more opportunities for young people. However, young adults themselves often don't support these changes, particularly when it comes to weakening job security for long-term positions.

So, why the resistance? This article explores a possible reason: strict rental market regulations may inadvertently create a demand for job protection. When landlords are highly selective due to strong housing market regulations, stable jobs become a valuable signal of a renter's reliability and ability to pay. This dynamic can lead to unexpected consequences, where even unemployed individuals may favor job protection policies.

We will look at how job protection and housing market regulations intersect, potentially creating barriers for young people entering the workforce and seeking independent living. We'll examine research, explore the underlying economic principles, and discuss potential solutions for a more balanced and accessible system.

The Unexpected Link: How Rental Regulations Drive Demand for Job Security

A surreal illustration symbolizing the barriers and opportunities faced by young adults in the housing and job markets.

The central idea is that tight housing market regulations (HMR) create a social demand for job protection as a second-best way to show you are a reliable tenant. Landlords need to be careful about who they rent to because it's hard to evict someone if they can't pay. To figure out who's a good risk, landlords use signals from the labor market, like whether someone has a stable, long-term job. Protecting these regular jobs then becomes a way to help landlords sort through potential renters, indirectly expanding the rental market.

Imagine a system where it's incredibly difficult and costly for landlords to evict tenants. In this scenario, landlords will want to screen applicants more carefully, leading them to prioritize those with reliable income. But how can a landlord quickly assess an applicant's income reliability? This is where stable employment steps in. A long-term job, especially one with strong protections against dismissal, signals to the landlord that the applicant is likely to have a steady income stream and be able to pay rent consistently.

  • Tighter Regulations, Higher Scrutiny: When rental markets are heavily regulated, landlords face greater risks from rent defaults, making them more selective.
  • Stable Jobs as Signals: Long-term jobs, particularly those with strong protections, signal reliability to landlords.
  • Demand for Protection: This dynamic creates an unexpected demand for job protection, even among those who don't currently hold such positions.
This creates a peculiar situation. Typically, it's assumed that workers looking to enter the market dislike job protection policies, as this keeps them out of jobs, and it's the general belief of economists. Yet workers, on the other hand, actually like them! Workers know that strict employment protection policies help them find housing. So, instead of reducing them, the policies are actually expanding social demand for those protectionist policies!

Finding the Right Balance: Policy Implications

The study suggests a need to rethink housing market regulations to reduce reliance on job protection as a screening tool. Policies ensuring landlords against rent default could diminish political support for job protection and open the door for labor market reforms. France's Visale guarantee, offering rent default coverage to individuals under 30 and short-term employees, represents a move in this direction. Broader implementation of such initiatives may create a more equitable environment for young adults navigating housing and employment.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the main argument regarding the relationship between job protection and housing regulations?

The central argument is that stringent **housing market regulations (HMR)** inadvertently increase the social demand for **job protection**. Because **HMR** make it harder for landlords to evict tenants, landlords become more selective. They then use the stability of long-term jobs as a key indicator of a potential renter's reliability and ability to consistently pay rent. This creates an unexpected situation where the demand for **job protection** is fueled by the regulations governing housing, even among unemployed individuals.

2

How do strict housing market regulations influence landlords' behavior and what impact does this have on job security?

Tighter **housing market regulations (HMR)** compel landlords to be more cautious about selecting tenants. Due to the difficulties and costs associated with evicting tenants in highly regulated markets, landlords seek ways to minimize risk. They scrutinize applicants more carefully, using signals of reliability. Stable, long-term jobs, especially those with strong protections, become valuable signals. Consequently, this leads to a higher demand for **job protection**, as it's perceived to enhance a person's ability to secure housing. This illustrates how **HMR** indirectly influence **job protection** by altering landlord's screening criteria.

3

Why might young adults, even those unemployed, support **job protection** policies despite common economic assumptions?

Young adults, even if unemployed, might support **job protection** policies due to their indirect effect on housing accessibility. The argument presented suggests that **housing market regulations (HMR)** make it difficult for landlords to evict tenants. This leads landlords to favor applicants who can demonstrate stable income, and a secure job is a strong indicator of this. Therefore, when **HMR** are in place, strong **job protection** policies increase the chances of securing rental housing. This is why young adults, including those who are unemployed, are more likely to favor **job protection**, as it helps them navigate the housing market more successfully.

4

What are the potential solutions to balance **job protection** and **housing market regulations (HMR)** for young adults?

The study suggests that we rethink **housing market regulations (HMR)** to lessen the reliance on **job protection** as a screening tool. Providing solutions that protect landlords from rent defaults would reduce the need for them to screen so carefully. As landlords become less concerned with the risk of rent default, the political support for **job protection** could diminish, and it would open the door for further **labor market reforms**. An example is France's **Visale guarantee**, which is designed to protect landlords against rent default and covers young people. The broader implementations of such initiatives may create a more equitable environment for young adults navigating housing and employment.

5

What is the role of stable jobs in the context of **housing market regulations (HMR)**?

In the context of strict **housing market regulations (HMR)**, stable jobs act as crucial signals of a potential renter's reliability. When landlords face difficulties evicting tenants, they become extremely selective. Long-term jobs with strong protections indicate a steady income stream, making those applicants more attractive. This signals to landlords that the applicant can consistently pay rent. Therefore, stable jobs serve as an indirect means of expanding the rental market by helping landlords assess an applicant's reliability, and indirectly, increasing the demand for **job protection**.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.