Illustration of liver size mismatch in transplantation, symbolizing the delicate balance between donor and recipient.

Liver Transplant Size Matters: How Mismatches Impact Survival

Avery Sinclair in Health & Wellness July 2025 • 4 min read.

"Discover the surprising link between donor and recipient liver size and its effect on transplant outcomes."

Liver transplantation is a life-saving procedure for individuals with end-stage liver disease. While living donor transplants allow for meticulous size matching between donor and recipient, deceased donor transplants often present challenges in achieving the same level of precision.

Traditionally, less emphasis has been placed on precise size matching in deceased donor liver transplantation compared to living donor procedures. However, emerging research suggests that size mismatches can significantly impact patient outcomes, highlighting the need for a closer look at current practices.

This article explores a recent study investigating the effects of liver size mismatch (SMM) in deceased donor liver transplantation, examining how these mismatches influence graft and patient survival rates. We'll break down the findings, discuss their implications, and consider what this means for improving transplant success.

The Impact of Size Mismatch on Transplant Success

Illustration of liver size mismatch in transplantation, symbolizing the delicate balance between donor and recipient.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, analyzing data from 884 deceased donor liver transplant recipients between 2006 and 2015. The study classified patients based on Basal Surface Area index (BSAi) into three groups: small for size (SFS), normal for size (NFS), and large for size (LFS). Size mismatch (SMM) was defined as significant deviations from the normal range.

The study revealed that approximately 9.3% of the transplant recipients experienced a size mismatch (SMM). While factors like age, race, and cold ischemic time did not significantly differ between the NFS and SMM groups, gender combinations showed a notable disparity. Specifically, transplants involving female donors and male recipients were more common in the SMM group (p > .001).

Graft Survival: The mean 2-year graft survival was significantly lower in the SMM group compared to the NFS group (623 days vs. 660 days; p = .042).
Patient Survival: Similarly, the mean 2-year patient survival was also significantly reduced in the SMM group (641 days vs. 672 days; p = .045).

These results indicate that liver size mismatch in deceased donor transplants is associated with poorer outcomes, affecting both graft and patient survival. The study underscores the importance of considering size matching to improve the success rates of liver transplantation.

What This Means for the Future of Liver Transplantation

The findings from this study highlight the need for increased awareness and consideration of liver size matching in deceased donor transplantation. While logistical challenges exist, strategies to optimize size compatibility could lead to improved patient and graft survival rates.

Future research should focus on developing more refined methods for assessing optimal liver size and predicting the impact of mismatches. This may involve advanced imaging techniques and computational models to better evaluate donor-recipient compatibility.

Ultimately, a more personalized approach to liver transplantation, incorporating careful size assessment and matching, has the potential to significantly enhance long-term outcomes for patients in need of this life-saving procedure.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What is liver transplantation, and why is it important?

Liver transplantation is a procedure for individuals with end-stage liver disease. It involves replacing a diseased liver with a healthy one, either from a living donor or a deceased donor. In this context, it is important because the success of this procedure directly impacts patient survival. This study highlights the significance of considering factors like size matching to improve the success rates of the transplant, particularly in deceased donor procedures.

What is liver size mismatch (SMM), and what does it mean for the transplant?

Size mismatch (SMM) in the context of liver transplantation refers to a significant difference between the size of the donor liver and the recipient's body size. The study used Basal Surface Area index (BSAi) to categorize patients into small for size (SFS), normal for size (NFS), and large for size (LFS) groups. The implications are substantial because size mismatches, especially in deceased donor transplants, have been shown to negatively affect both graft survival and patient survival rates.

What did the study reveal about the prevalence and impact of size mismatch (SMM)?

The study found that approximately 9.3% of the deceased donor liver transplant recipients experienced a size mismatch (SMM). The study revealed the mean 2-year graft survival was significantly lower in the SMM group compared to the NFS group. Similarly, the mean 2-year patient survival was also significantly reduced in the SMM group. This points to the importance of careful donor selection and size matching strategies to improve outcomes.

What is the difference between graft survival and patient survival in this context?

Graft survival refers to how long the transplanted liver (the graft) functions effectively in the recipient's body. Patient survival refers to how long the recipient lives after the transplant. The study found that both graft survival and patient survival were significantly lower in the size mismatch (SMM) group compared to the normal for size (NFS) group. This means that size mismatches lead to a higher risk of the transplanted liver failing and/or the patient dying sooner after the transplant.

What are the implications of the study for future liver transplant procedures?

The findings suggest that a closer look at current practices is needed in deceased donor liver transplantation. While logistical challenges exist, strategies to optimize size compatibility could lead to improved patient and graft survival rates. This could involve better donor selection criteria, improved assessment of liver size, and potentially, techniques to address size mismatches during the transplant procedure. The gender combinations showed a notable disparity where transplants involving female donors and male recipients were more common in the SMM group. This could be a factor that needs further investigation.