Football stadium transforming into a giant chessboard, representing the shift to Elo-based rankings.

Level Up Your Game: Why Football Needs an Elo-Based Ranking Revolution

"Ditch the old UEFA coefficients and embrace a smarter, fairer system for ranking European football clubs. Here's how the Elo rating could change the game."


In the high-stakes world of European club football, accurate team rankings aren't just for bragging rights—they determine tournament seedings, influence financial distributions, and ultimately shape competitive balance. For years, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) has relied on its club coefficient system. However, a growing chorus of voices is questioning whether this is the most effective approach.

Imagine a system that not only considers past performance in European competitions but also factors in the strength of opponents, recent form, and even national league results. This is the promise of the Elo rating system, a method widely used in chess and other sports, now knocking on the door of European football. The key question: Can the Elo rating system improve upon the existing UEFA club coefficient in predicting team success and ensuring fairer tournaments?

The UEFA Champions League, one of the most watched sports tournaments in the world, is set to implement significant reforms in the 2024/25 season. The traditional group stage will be replaced with a single league format where each of the 36 teams will play eight matches. In such a structure it becomes even more vital to forecast accurately the performance of teams. It's time to investigate if taking games played in the national leagues into account would improve the predictions. According to logistic regression models, a variant of the Elo method provides a higher accuracy in terms of explanatory power in the Champions League matches.

UEFA Club Coefficient: A System Under Scrutiny

Football stadium transforming into a giant chessboard, representing the shift to Elo-based rankings.

The UEFA club coefficient, calculated based on a team's performance in European competitions over the previous five seasons, is the cornerstone of team rankings. This system determines which teams are seeded into which pots for the Champions League and Europa League draws, influencing their path through the tournament.

However, the UEFA coefficient faces criticism for its limitations. It primarily focuses on European competition results, often neglecting the significance of domestic league performance. A team excelling in their national league might find itself unfairly lower in the UEFA rankings if they had a poor run in Europe a few seasons prior. This can lead to unbalanced group stages and potentially disadvantage stronger teams.
  • Limited Scope: Primarily focuses on UEFA competition results, neglecting domestic performance.
  • Delayed Reflection: Based on the past five seasons, potentially not reflecting current team strength.
  • Equal Weighting: All wins and draws in group stages increase the rating by the same amount.
According to a recent study the UEFA club coefficient itself does not contribute positively to success in this tournament. In fact, some studies even suggest that seeding didn't have any effect on the performance of teams.

The Future of Football Rankings: Embracing Elo and Beyond

The winds of change are blowing through European football. As UEFA prepares for its revamped Champions League format, the time is ripe to reconsider the methods used to rank and seed teams. The Elo rating system offers a compelling alternative, one that promises greater accuracy, fairness, and a more data-driven approach to the beautiful game.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.