Digital art depicting a tug-of-war, symbolizing the fight for economic balance.

Is the Rich Getting Richer? Unveiling the Truth Behind Income Inequality

Elliot Brynn in Business & Economy August 2025 • 4 min read.

"Digging into the core of Piketty's Problem, its impact on our society, and how power and social relations play a role in it."

Income inequality has become a hot topic. The idea that the rich are getting richer while everyone else struggles is a narrative that's captured widespread attention. But is it just a story, or is there solid economic theory behind it? This article explores that question. We will dissect the arguments surrounding inequality, looking into the work of economist Thomas Piketty and others, to see what's really driving the wealth gap.

At the heart of the discussion is a concept Piketty calls the 'r > g' inequality. In simple terms, it suggests that when the rate of return on capital (r) is greater than the economic growth rate (g), inequality will increase. But what factors determine 'r,' and why doesn't it simply fall as economies grow? Answering that question involves looking beyond traditional economics into the realms of power, social structures, and institutions.

We'll go beyond textbook models to understand how things like political influence, market dominance, and even social norms play a crucial role in shaping who gets what. Furthermore, this analysis touches housing market in the US, institutions, and power of property.

The Core of the Matter: Piketty's Inequality Problem

Digital art depicting a tug-of-war, symbolizing the fight for economic balance.

In his well-known book, 'Capital in the Twenty-First Century,' Thomas Piketty argued that the difference between the rate of return on capital and the rate of economic growth is a primary driver of income inequality. The "r > g" dynamic suggests that wealth tends to concentrate in the hands of those who already possess it, leading to a widening gap between the rich and everyone else.

However, there's a catch. Traditional economic thinking suggests that as economies grow and capital accumulates, the rate of return on that capital should decrease. If this were true, inequality might naturally stabilize or even decline over time. But Piketty's data doesn't always line up with that prediction. This disconnect leads to what's being called the 'Piketty Problem': Why doesn't 'r' fall as expected, and what does that mean for the future of inequality?

Challenging Traditional Views: Many believe market forces alone dictate wealth distribution.
The Role of Institutions: Legal, political, and social systems significantly impact the economy.
Power Dynamics: Those with power shape these systems to benefit themselves.

One compelling answer lies in the role of institutions – the formal and informal rules that govern society. These institutions, shaped by political and economic power, can influence the rate of return on capital. If institutions favor those who already hold wealth, they can counteract the natural tendency for 'r' to fall, perpetuating or even increasing inequality. In essence, it's not just about how much capital you have, but also about the rules of the game and who gets to write them.

Beyond Economics: A New Vision of Wealth

Ultimately, addressing income inequality requires us to look beyond traditional economic models. By understanding the interplay of institutions, power, and social norms, we can begin to develop policies that promote a more equitable distribution of wealth and opportunity. The Piketty Problem isn't just an academic puzzle; it's a call to action to create a fairer and more just society.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What is Piketty's 'r > g' inequality, and why is it considered a key factor in understanding income inequality?

Piketty's 'r > g' inequality suggests that income inequality increases when the rate of return on capital (r) exceeds the economic growth rate (g). This dynamic implies that wealth tends to concentrate among those who already possess it, as their capital grows faster than the overall economy, leading to a widening wealth gap. It's a foundational concept in understanding how wealth concentrates over time. What isn't immediately obvious is that this concentrates capital over generations and also impacts social mobility negatively.

What is the 'Piketty Problem,' and why does the rate of return on capital ('r') not decrease as economies grow, as traditional economics suggests?

The 'Piketty Problem' refers to the disconnect between traditional economic theory, which predicts that the rate of return on capital ('r') should decrease as economies grow and capital accumulates, and Piketty's data, which often shows that 'r' remains high or even increases. This is attributed to institutional forces shaped by political and economic power, which favor existing wealth holders and counteract the natural tendency for 'r' to fall. These forces include legal, political, and social systems that perpetuate inequality.

Beyond economics, what other factors contribute to shaping wealth distribution and influencing the rate of return on capital ('r')?

Factors beyond traditional economics significantly influence wealth distribution. Institutions—formal and informal rules governing society—play a crucial role. These institutions, influenced by political and economic power, shape the rate of return on capital. Political influence, market dominance, social norms, and the power of property all impact who accumulates wealth. These forces can counteract the natural tendency for 'r' to fall, perpetuating inequality.

How do institutions, as formal and informal rules of society, impact the perpetuation or reduction of income inequality?

Institutions, encompassing legal, political, and social systems, play a vital role. If these institutions favor those who already hold wealth, they can counteract the natural tendency for 'r' to fall, thus perpetuating or increasing inequality. The power to shape these institutions to benefit specific groups underscores the importance of understanding power dynamics in economic analysis. This includes analysis of housing market, institutions, and power of property.

What is the role of power dynamics in shaping economic systems and perpetuating income inequality, and how can understanding these dynamics help create a fairer society?

Power dynamics are crucial in shaping economic systems because those with power influence institutions to benefit themselves. This influence affects wealth distribution and perpetuates income inequality. By understanding the interplay of institutions, power, and social norms, policies can be developed to promote a more equitable distribution of wealth and opportunity. Addressing the 'Piketty Problem' requires action to create a fairer and more just society. This could involve reforming institutions to reduce their bias towards wealth holders and promote policies that encourage broader wealth distribution.