Stylized illustration of a heart intertwined with currency symbols and circuitry, representing heart health, technology, and healthcare costs.

Heart Failure Tech: Can New Devices Cut Your Healthcare Costs?

"Innovative heart devices like MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) show promise in reducing hospital visits and saving you money. Is this the future of heart failure treatment?"


Heart failure is a serious condition, but technological advancements are offering new hope. MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) is one such innovation. This technology aims to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), a treatment used to help the heart's chambers beat in a coordinated way.

Traditional CRT uses a quadripolar biventricular pacing (QUAD-BiV) system. MPP, however, offers a different approach by pacing from multiple points in the heart. Early studies suggest that MPP, particularly when configured for anatomically distant pacing (MPP-AS), may lead to better patient outcomes. This article explores whether MPP-AS can reduce healthcare costs associated with heart failure.

We'll delve into the findings of a study presented at the 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), which investigated the potential cost savings of MPP-AS compared to QUAD-BiV. The goal is to understand how these technologies impact hospitalization rates, emergency room visits, and overall healthcare expenses for heart failure patients.

MPP-AS: A Cost-Effective Solution for Heart Failure?

Stylized illustration of a heart intertwined with currency symbols and circuitry, representing heart health, technology, and healthcare costs.

The study used a model to simulate the costs associated with both MPP-AS and QUAD-BiV over a 10-year period. Researchers looked at various factors, including:

The study considered data from the MPP IDE trial, which included 52 patients programmed with MPP-AS and 232 with QUAD-BiV. This data provided the basis for estimating healthcare utilization rates for both groups.
  • Heart failure-related hospitalizations
  • Emergency room visits
  • Outpatient visits
  • Office visits
  • Mortality rates
The model then assigned costs to each type of healthcare event using data from the Marketscan Database, updated to reflect 2017 prices. By combining the utilization rates with the cost data, the researchers were able to estimate the total healthcare costs for each treatment strategy.

The Future of Heart Failure Treatment Costs

While the study suggests that MPP-AS may offer cost savings compared to QUAD-BiV, it’s important to note that these findings are based on a simulation model. More research is needed to confirm these results in real-world clinical settings. However, the study highlights the potential for innovative technologies like MPP-AS to not only improve patient outcomes but also reduce the financial burden of heart failure.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.