X-ray of a bone with embedded uranium particles, symbolizing veteran's health concerns.

Gulf War Veteran Health: Are We Seeing New Long-Term Effects?

"A recent study sheds light on potential bone density issues in veterans exposed to depleted uranium, raising new questions about long-term health surveillance."


For over 25 years, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been closely monitoring the health of Gulf War I veterans who experienced combat incidents involving depleted uranium (DU). This effort was initiated to assess potential adverse health effects from DU exposure, ensuring these veterans receive appropriate medical management.

A recent study focusing on this cohort has revealed a potential new concern: a possible association between depleted uranium exposure and bone density loss, which wasn't apparent in earlier assessments. This article explores these findings, what they might mean for veterans' health, and the ongoing efforts to understand the long-term consequences of DU exposure.

The study, conducted in 2017, evaluated 42 veterans, examining uranium levels in their urine and conducting comprehensive health assessments, including bone mineral density (BMD) measurements for those over 50. The results offer new insights into the potential long-term effects of DU exposure.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Depleted Uranium Exposure and Monitoring

The VA says long-term adverse health effects from depleted uranium (DU) exposure would not be expected, while noting that DU can be a potential health hazard if it enters the body through embedded fragments, contaminated wounds, inhalation, or ingestion. Veterans who think they may have been exposed can contact a VA Environmental Health Coordinator or provider, or call VET-HOME at 833-633-8846 and ask to be screened. A small group of Gulf War I veterans wounded in DU friendly-fire incidents has been monitored at the Baltimore VA Medical Center since 1994; 33 members were seen for surveillance in spring 2024.

How the Evidence Is Reviewed

The National Academies committee began by searching the scientific literature for human studies of long-term health outcomes that might be associated with depleted uranium (DU). It developed criteria to evaluate the relevance and quality of studies, and reviewed literature on DU, pyridostigmine bromide, sarin and cyclosarin, and anthrax and botulinum toxoid vaccines. A separate 2021 study applied its methods to a highly studied, population-representative sample of theatre-deployed and non-deployed Gulf War-era U.S. veterans in whom Gulf War Illness had been reported. These sources describe review and research approaches, but the supplied material does not specify their limitations.

DU’s First Large-Scale Gulf War Use

The VA says depleted uranium (DU) was first deployed on a large scale during the Gulf War. The U.S. military uses the dense metal in tank armor and projectiles, including for its ability to penetrate enemy armored vehicles. Health.mil describes the Gulf War as the first battlefield use of armor-piercing munitions and reinforced tank armor incorporating DU, and says DU is leftover uranium from the enrichment process, with 40% less radioactivity than natural uranium. A 2006 article described the debate over DU’s health effects among Gulf War veterans and others as unresolved after 15 years.

What Does Depleted Uranium Exposure Have To Do With Bone Health?

X-ray of a bone with embedded uranium particles, symbolizing veteran's health concerns.

Depleted uranium (DU) is a byproduct of uranium enrichment, used in military applications due to its high density. Gulf War veterans may have been exposed through:

  • Inhalation of particulate aerosols at the time of impact.
  • Superficial wound contamination.
  • Absorption from retained fragments.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Recent DU Surveillance and GWI Research

In spring 2024, 33 Gulf War I veterans wounded in depleted uranium (DU) friendly-fire incidents were seen at the Baltimore VA Medical Center for surveillance related to their combat exposure. The protocol included monitoring total and isotopic uranium concentrations in urine and a comprehensive health assessment. A separate 2021 telehealth evaluation assessed 37 members of a DU-exposed Gulf War I cohort using a protocol adapted for COVID-19 safety practices. In another line of research, a 2025 study’s secondary analysis found serum C18:0 ceramide was more than 56% higher in male Gulf War Illness veterans than in non-veteran healthy controls.

Evidence Remains Inconclusive

The National Academies committee concluded that there is still not enough evidence to determine whether depleted uranium exposure is associated with long-term health problems. Its report was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. A 2020 review also notes that Gulf War syndrome was a term created to describe veterans’ health problems and mentions reports of congenital disabilities among veterans’ children and elevated mortality among Gulf veterans.

Exposure Concerns and Evidence

A review of depleted uranium (DU) describes its military use in the Gulf and Balkans and discusses concerns that exposure could contribute to Gulf War Syndrome or cancer clusters. The 2025 Health Physics Society fact sheet says concerns about DU exposure, especially among veterans and healthcare professionals, have been raised since the 1991 Gulf War, and that it explains DU’s uses and potential health risks. The supplied source material does not provide comparative outcome figures or evidence that resolves those concerns.

DU, once absorbed, can accumulate in the body, with a significant portion depositing in bone. While previous studies have focused on kidney function and other potential health impacts, this recent research highlights a possible connection between DU exposure and bone density. The study found that veterans with higher levels of uranium in their urine also exhibited lower bone mineral density (BMD), raising concerns about potential long-term bone health.

What Does This Mean for Veterans and Future Research?

While the study reveals a potentially significant link between DU exposure and bone density loss, it's important to interpret the findings cautiously. The researchers emphasize that this is a novel observation requiring further investigation to confirm.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Long-Term Follow-Up of Exposed Veterans

The Baltimore VA DU Follow-Up Program was initiated in 1993 to monitor health effects in Gulf War veterans who were in or on U.S. Army vehicles hit by friendly fire involving DU munitions. Longitudinal surveillance of Gulf War I veterans injured in DU friendly-fire incidents has been reported since 1994. In spring 2019, 36 cohort members were evaluated using a protocol that included total and isotopic uranium measurements in urine and a comprehensive review of health outcomes.

Longitudinal surveillance of this cohort is crucial to fully understand the long-term effects of DU exposure. This includes:

Future research should also explore potential mechanisms by which DU might affect bone health, potentially through direct toxicity to bone cells or indirect effects on vitamin D metabolism. Continued monitoring and research are essential to ensure the health and well-being of veterans exposed to depleted uranium.

What the bone result adds-and does not establish

The bone-density result points to a possible difference concentrated in older cohort members with higher urine uranium, rather than a uniform finding across everyone monitored. It does not by itself establish that uranium caused the difference: other bone-metabolism measures were mostly within normal limits over time, and the paper describes this as a new finding.[1]

Where the bone-density finding is weakest

  • The reduced BMD in older participants was not mirrored by most other bone-metabolism measures, which were generally within normal limits over time.[1]

The 2017 clinical surveillance study at a glance

PopulationGulf War I veterans wounded in depleted uranium friendly-fire incidents[1]
Sample size42[1]
Settingclinical surveillance program[1]
Comparisonlower- vs. higher-urine uranium cohort sub-groups[1]
Effect sizeA significant deficit in BMD was observed in the over age 50, high uU sub-group.[1]
Times cited21[1]

How later surveillance puts the result in context

The 2024 surveillance report said the impaired BMD finding in older cohort members had appeared across three consecutive surveillance visits, extending the observation beyond the original report.[2]

That later report also found a significant decrease in bone mass in the high-DU subgroup compared with the low-DU subgroup, while describing few clinically significant findings in uranium target organs across the surveillance period.[3]

Later authors noted that earlier comparisons had not shown consistent uranium-related differences between exposure groups over time, placing the bone result alongside a broader record of mixed surveillance findings.[3]

What continued surveillance leaves unresolved

  • Does the lower BMD pattern persist as the cohort ages and uranium burden from retained fragments accrues?[1]
  • How do the higher estradiol concentrations observed between urine-uranium subgroups relate to bone metabolism and the BMD difference?[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1080/15287394.2018.1538914, Alternate LINK

Title: Surveillance Results And Bone Effects In The Gulf War Depleted Uranium-Exposed Cohort

Subject: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Journal: Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Authors: Melissa A Mcdiarmid, Marianne Cloeren, Joanna M Gaitens, Stella Hines, Elizabeth Streeten, Richard J. Breyer, Clayton H. Brown, Marian Condon, Tracy Roth, Marc Oliver, Lawrence Brown, Moira Dux, Michael R. Lewin-Smith, Frederick Strathmann, Maria A. Velez-Quinones, Patricia Gucer

Published: 2018-10-18

Everything You Need To Know

1

What exactly is Depleted Uranium, and how could veterans have been exposed to it?

Depleted uranium (DU) is a byproduct of uranium enrichment, utilized in military applications owing to its high density. Gulf War veterans might have been exposed to DU through inhalation of particulate aerosols during impacts, superficial wound contamination, or absorption from retained fragments. Once absorbed, DU can accumulate in the body, with a significant portion depositing in bone.

2

Why is the possible link between Depleted Uranium exposure and bone health so important?

The potential link between Depleted uranium (DU) exposure and bone density is significant because it suggests previously unrecognized long-term health consequences for Gulf War veterans. While earlier assessments focused on kidney function and other impacts, this discovery highlights a new area of concern. If confirmed, this could mean that a greater number of veterans could be at risk for osteoporosis and related health issues. This finding warrants further investigation to understand the full implications for veteran health management and care.

3

What role has the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) played in monitoring veterans' health?

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been monitoring Gulf War I veterans exposed to Depleted uranium (DU) for over 25 years. The initial monitoring focused on potential adverse health effects from DU exposure, providing appropriate medical management. The recent study adds to this by examining bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Ongoing surveillance helps to identify previously unacknowledged health impacts, improving veterans’ healthcare.

4

What specific methods were used in the study to assess the effects of Depleted Uranium exposure?

The study assessed 42 veterans, examining uranium levels in their urine and conducting comprehensive health assessments, including bone mineral density (BMD) measurements for those over 50. The researchers found a potential link between the presence of Depleted uranium (DU) in veterans' urine and reduced bone mineral density. This finding is crucial as it offers new insights into the long-term effects of DU exposure, expanding the scope of health concerns.

5

What are the next steps following this recent study's findings?

The researchers emphasize that the observed link between Depleted uranium (DU) exposure and bone density loss is a novel observation requiring further confirmation through additional research. Further investigation is required to confirm the association, understand the mechanisms at play, and determine the extent of the impact on veterans' health. This might include larger studies and more detailed analysis to establish the prevalence of this issue and refine the management strategies for veterans affected by DU exposure.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.