Earth surrounded by existential threats, but protected by human ingenuity.

Global Catastrophic Risks: Are We Ready for the Next Existential Threat?

Soraya Malik in Science & Nature August 2025 • 4 min read.

"Understanding the Value of Information in Protecting Humanity's Future"

Imagine a world where the very existence of humanity is threatened. This isn't a plot from a sci-fi movie, but a real concern that experts are actively working to address. Global Catastrophic Risks (GCRs) are events that could significantly harm or even destroy human civilization. Think of events like a large-scale nuclear war, a devastating pandemic, or even a massive asteroid impact. These aren't just doomsday scenarios; they are risks that, while potentially low in probability, could have irreversible consequences.

Understanding and preparing for these risks is crucial, but where do we even begin? How do we allocate resources effectively to protect against threats that range from the highly improbable to the almost inevitable? This is where the value of information comes in. Research that reduces uncertainties about the likelihood and impact of GCRs can be invaluable in guiding our decisions and ensuring we're investing in the right protective measures.

This article delves into the concept of assessing the value of information in the context of GCRs. We'll explore how a cost-effectiveness-based approach can help us make informed decisions about risk reduction, moving beyond simply equating lives and dollars to focus on tangible, impactful strategies for safeguarding our future.

Why Prioritizing GCR Reduction is More Than Just a Good Idea

Earth surrounded by existential threats, but protected by human ingenuity.

A growing consensus is emerging: reducing GCRs should be a high priority for society. The potential devastation these events could cause far outweighs the costs of preventative measures. However, simply recognizing the importance of GCR reduction isn't enough. We need to strategically allocate resources, determining the best balance between direct risk-reducing interventions and the research that informs those interventions.

Consider the sheer scale of the problem. We're talking about protecting the entire planet from threats that could wipe out civilization as we know it. This requires a different kind of thinking, one that goes beyond traditional cost-benefit analyses. We need to:

Acknowledge the Limitations of Traditional Metrics: Equating lives and dollars, while common in decision-making, might not be appropriate given the immense scale of GCRs.
Account for Complex Interactions: GCRs don't exist in a vacuum. One event can trigger or exacerbate others, creating a domino effect of devastation.
Embrace Uncertainty: We can’t predict the future with certainty, but we can use the information we have to make informed decisions and adapt our strategies as new information emerges.

Focusing on cost-effectiveness – that is, maximizing GCR reduction per unit cost – allows us to make strategic decisions without getting bogged down in the complexities of assigning a monetary value to human lives on a global scale. This approach also highlights the importance of research in informing our decisions and ensuring we're investing in the most impactful interventions.

A Call to Action: Investing in a Safer Future

While real-world research won't eliminate all uncertainties, even imperfect information can significantly improve our decision-making and resource allocation. By embracing a comprehensive, integrated approach to GCR assessment, we can prioritize research efforts, guide policy decisions, and ultimately, invest in a safer, more secure future for all of humanity. It's not just about averting disaster, it's about building a more resilient world, capable of withstanding whatever challenges lie ahead.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What are Global Catastrophic Risks (GCRs) and why should we be concerned about them?

Global Catastrophic Risks (GCRs) are events that have the potential to inflict significant harm on a global scale, possibly even destroying human civilization. These include scenarios like nuclear war, devastating pandemics, or massive asteroid impacts. The concern stems from the fact that while the probability of some GCRs might be low, the consequences are irreversible and could lead to the extinction of humanity. Understanding and preparing for GCRs is important because of the scale of devastation that such an event can cause.

Why is it important to assess the 'value of information' when dealing with Global Catastrophic Risks?

Assessing the 'value of information' is crucial in the context of Global Catastrophic Risks because it helps guide decisions about resource allocation for risk reduction. By investing in research that reduces uncertainties about the likelihood and impact of GCRs, we can make more informed choices about which protective measures to prioritize. This approach moves beyond simply equating lives and dollars and focuses on developing tangible, impactful strategies for safeguarding the future. Real-world research won't eliminate all uncertainties, but even imperfect information can significantly improve decision-making and resource allocation.

What are the limitations of traditional cost-benefit analyses when applied to Global Catastrophic Risks?

Traditional cost-benefit analyses, which often involve equating lives and dollars, may not be appropriate when dealing with Global Catastrophic Risks due to the immense scale of potential devastation. GCRs also involve complex interactions, where one event can trigger or exacerbate others, creating a domino effect. Furthermore, traditional analyses may struggle to adequately account for the inherent uncertainties associated with predicting and preparing for these rare but potentially catastrophic events.

How can a cost-effectiveness approach help in making strategic decisions regarding Global Catastrophic Risks?

A cost-effectiveness approach allows for making strategic decisions without getting bogged down in assigning a monetary value to human lives on a global scale. This approach focuses on maximizing GCR reduction per unit cost, highlighting the importance of research in informing decisions and ensuring investments are made in the most impactful interventions. This method also allows for a more comprehensive and integrated approach to GCR assessment, enabling the prioritization of research efforts and guiding policy decisions.

Beyond averting disasters, how does focusing on Global Catastrophic Risks contribute to building a better world?

Focusing on Global Catastrophic Risks (GCRs) is not just about preventing doomsday scenarios; it's about building a more resilient world. By embracing a comprehensive, integrated approach to GCR assessment, prioritizing research efforts, and guiding policy decisions, we can invest in a safer, more secure future for all of humanity. This involves not only averting potential disasters but also strengthening our ability to withstand various challenges and adapt to evolving threats. The implications of this work lead to a more robust and prepared global society.