Equine herpesvirus battling with immune cells in a horse.

Equine Herpesvirus: How a Virus Triggers Abortion in Horses

"Understanding EHV-1's strategy for evading the immune system could lead to better prevention."


Equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) is a major threat to horses. It can cause everything from mild respiratory issues to late-term abortions and neurological problems. What makes EHV-1 so complex is that different strains behave differently. Some are more likely to cause abortions (abortigenic), while others lead to neurological issues (neurovirulent). Both types replicate in the lining of the upper respiratory tract, but abortigenic strains tend to form larger, more noticeable patches.

Scientists have been trying to figure out why these strains differ in their effects. One idea is that abortigenic strains might be better at dodging the horse's immune defenses, specifically the type I interferon response. Interferons are crucial proteins that help the body fight off viruses. If a virus can suppress or avoid this response, it could replicate more effectively and cause more severe disease.

This article delves into new research that explores how abortigenic and neurovirulent EHV-1 strains interact with the interferon response. By understanding these interactions, we can potentially develop better strategies to protect horses from the devastating effects of EHV-1.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

EHV-1 and EHM Impact

Of the nine known equine herpesviruses, EHV-1, EHV-3, and EHV-4 pose the highest disease risk to U.S. horses, and these viruses do not pose a risk to people. EHV-1 is associated with serious disease, including equine herpesvirus myeloencephalopathy (EHM). In one reported outbreak, 90 horses were infected with EHV-1 or EHM, while another 72 were suspected cases; a separate 2025 study reported an EHM case-fatality rate of 12% among its cases.

Biosecurity and Vaccination

Accepted EHV-1 control relies on vaccination alongside a comprehensive biosecurity program. Guidance includes keeping returning horses at least 30 feet from others, quarantining groups that traveled together as a cluster, and preventing nose-to-nose contact. These measures can limit signs and infection spread, but vaccination is not presented as a standalone solution.

A Widespread, Persistent Virus

EHV-1 has long been recognized as one of the most important and prevalent viral pathogens affecting horses and as a major threat to the equine industry. Oregon guidance reports that almost all horses have been infected by age two, with initial exposure generally occurring in foals through contact with their dams. The virus therefore represents both an established historical presence in horse populations and an ongoing disease concern.

Decoding EHV-1's Immune Evasion Tactics: What the Study Reveals

Equine herpesvirus battling with immune cells in a horse.

To investigate the interferon response, researchers used two models: primary respiratory epithelial cells (EREC) and respiratory mucosa explants (tissue samples) from horses. They infected these with both abortigenic and neurovirulent EHV-1 strains and then measured interferon alpha (IFNα) levels.

The study revealed a few key findings:

  • Interferon Production: Both types of EHV-1 triggered IFNα production in the respiratory tissues. There was no significant difference in the amount of interferon produced between the abortigenic and neurovirulent strains.
  • IFN Susceptibility: Pretreating cells with recombinant equine IFNα (rEqIFNα) suppressed the replication of both types of EHV-1. Conversely, blocking interferon signaling with Ruxolitinib (Rux) increased viral replication, indicating that both strain types are susceptible to interferon's antiviral effects.
  • Abortigenic Strain Anomaly: In a surprising twist, a moderate concentration of rEqIFNα (100 U/ml) actually increased the replication of abortigenic EHV-1 in some horses, compared to a lower concentration (10 U/ml). This effect wasn't seen with the neurovirulent strains.
  • Plaque Size Differences: When interferon signaling was blocked, the typically smaller viral plaques caused by neurovirulent strains became larger. However, the plaque size of abortigenic strains remained relatively unchanged.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Research on EHV-1 Infection

Current research describes EHV-1 as a highly contagious respiratory pathogen transmitted through horse-to-horse contact. The Wagner Laboratory identifies fever, nasal discharge, and lethargy among the associated clinical signs. A 2025 review examines equine herpesvirus infections in horses and donkeys, including their viral causes and clinical presentations.

Neurologic Disease Is Serious but Variable

EHV-1 neurologic disease can progress quickly, causing incoordination, weakness, and difficulty standing. However, EHM is not uniformly fatal: the Equine Disease Communication Center reports that 60-70% of affected horses recover with treatment in most outbreaks. These outcomes show why severe neurologic signs should not be equated with inevitable death, even though the disease remains serious.

EHV-1 Versus Other EHV Types

EHV-1 most commonly causes respiratory illness but can also cause pregnancy loss or neurologic disease. By contrast, EHV-4 primarily causes respiratory disease and rarely leads to abortion or neurologic signs. This comparison places EHV-1 as the more important concern when reproductive or neurologic complications are involved.

These results suggest that while both types of EHV-1 trigger interferon production, the abortigenic strains might have developed unique mechanisms to counteract or even exploit the interferon response under certain conditions. This could explain why abortigenic strains replicate more efficiently in the upper respiratory tract.

What Does This Mean for Horse Owners?

This research highlights the crucial role of the interferon response in controlling EHV-1. It also suggests that abortigenic EHV-1 strains might have evolved ways to lessen the impact of interferon, potentially explaining their ability to cause more severe respiratory disease and abortions.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Exposure, Latency, and Outbreak Risk

EHV-4 primarily causes respiratory disease and rarely produces abortion or neurologic signs, while most horses are exposed early in life and may carry the virus in a latent state. Recent cases have been linked to a rodeo event, with horses from Texas and Oklahoma diagnosed with equine herpesvirus. Together, these reports highlight the contrast between widespread early exposure and the outbreak risks associated with movement and congregation of horses.

A Growing Equine Healthcare Market

The equine healthcare market is projected to surpass US$1.3 billion by 2035. Transparency Market Research identifies rising equine diseases as a driver and specifically includes equine influenza and equine herpesvirus among the relevant indications. This projection suggests that EHV will remain part of the veterinary healthcare market's future priorities.

Protecting the Equestrian Community

Equine herpesvirus affects more than individual horses because transmission can threaten the broader equestrian community. Washington State guidance emphasizes that timely intervention can help prevent spread and mitigate the virus's impact on equine health and that community. The systemic challenge is therefore coordinating prompt recognition and response across connected horse populations.

Consequences for Horses and Owners

EHV-1 primarily causes upper respiratory disease and abortions or stillbirths in horses. In some cases, it causes a neurologic disease called equine herpesvirus myeloencephalopathy. For horse owners, the same infection can therefore involve respiratory illness, reproductive loss, or potentially disabling neurologic disease.

While more research is needed to fully understand these mechanisms, these findings open new doors for developing more effective prevention and treatment strategies. Potential avenues include:

<ul> <li><b>Targeted Vaccines:</b> Designing vaccines that specifically boost the interferon response against abortigenic strains.</li> <li><b>Immunomodulatory Therapies:</b> Developing therapies that fine-tune the interferon response to prevent the virus from exploiting it.</li> <li><b>Early Detection:</b> Improving diagnostic tools for early detection of EHV-1, allowing for timely intervention and minimizing the risk of outbreaks.</li> </ul>

What the interferon tests reveal about EHV-1

The study points to a difference not in whether the strains prompt an interferon response, but in how the strains behave under that antiviral pressure: abortigenic strains showed a replication increase at the higher tested interferon level in some horses, unlike neurovirulent strains.[1] [2]

That pattern is consistent with abortigenic strains being better adapted to antiviral proteins, but it does not establish that they replicate more in nasal tissue or explain the mechanism behind the difference.[1]

Together, the results suggest that interferon helps control both strain types while leaving open whether abortigenic strains can partly counter its effects.[2]

Limits on what the experiments establish

  • The replication increase was seen in only some of the horses tested, so the result does not show that it occurs consistently.[2]
  • The authors caution that the laboratory replication pattern does not necessarily predict what happens in nasal tissue.[1]
  • The study did not identify the molecular processes behind the apparent strain differences in interferon evasion.[1]
  • The reason interferon showed low biological activity in nasal explants remained unresolved.[1]

Testing interferon responses in equine respiratory cells and tissue

PopulationPrimary respiratory epithelial cells and respiratory mucosa explants exposed to abortigenic or neurovirulent EHV1 strains[2]
Sample sizeTwo abortigenic and two neurovirulent EHV1 strains[2]
SettingEx vivo respiratory mucosa explants and primary respiratory epithelial cells[2]
ComparisonAbortigenic versus neurovirulent EHV1 strains; treatment with recombinant equine IFNα or Ruxolitinib[2]
Main outcomeIFNα response and EHV1 replication[2]
Effect sizeBoth variants were suppressed by rEqIFNα; in two out of three horses, replication of abortigenic EHV1 increased at 100 U/ml compared with 10 U/ml, unlike neurovirulent strains.[2]
Conflicts of interestNo commercial or financial relationships were declared as a potential conflict of interest.[2]
Times cited19[2]

What remains unresolved about strain-specific interferon effects

  • What explains the low interferon bioactivity observed in nasal mucosa explants?[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00312, Alternate LINK

Title: Abortigenic But Not Neurotropic Equine Herpes Virus 1 Modulates The Interferon Antiviral Defense

Subject: Infectious Diseases

Journal: Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Publisher: Frontiers Media SA

Authors: Katrien C. K. Poelaert, Jolien Van Cleemput, Kathlyn Laval, Herman W. Favoreel, Gisela Soboll Hussey, Roger K. Maes, Hans J. Nauwynck

Published: 2018-09-12

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are the primary health risks associated with Equine Herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) in horses?

Equine Herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) poses a significant threat to horses as it leads to a spectrum of health issues. These range from relatively mild respiratory infections to severe consequences such as late-term abortions in pregnant mares and debilitating neurological disorders. The complexity of EHV-1 lies in the fact that different strains of the virus exhibit varying degrees of virulence, with some strains being more prone to inducing abortions (abortigenic) while others are more likely to cause neurological problems (neurovirulent).

2

How do abortigenic and neurovirulent strains of Equine Herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) interact with the interferon response in horses, according to recent research?

Research indicates that both abortigenic and neurovirulent strains of Equine Herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) trigger the production of interferon alpha (IFNα) in the respiratory tissues of horses. Interferons are crucial proteins that help the body fight off viruses. However, a notable finding is that abortigenic strains of EHV-1 might have developed mechanisms to counteract or even exploit the interferon response under certain conditions. This could explain why abortigenic strains replicate more efficiently in the upper respiratory tract and cause more severe respiratory disease and abortions. The study also revealed that blocking interferon signaling increased viral replication, indicating that both strain types are susceptible to interferon's antiviral effects.

3

What methods were used to investigate the interferon response to abortigenic and neurovirulent strains of Equine Herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) in the recent study?

The study used primary respiratory epithelial cells (EREC) and respiratory mucosa explants (tissue samples) from horses. Researchers infected these with both abortigenic and neurovirulent EHV-1 strains and then measured interferon alpha (IFNα) levels. They also pretreated cells with recombinant equine IFNα (rEqIFNα) to suppress replication of both types of EHV-1 and blocked interferon signaling with Ruxolitinib (Rux) to increase viral replication. Plaque sizes were also measured in each of these conditions to see how the viral spread differed between strain types when the interferon response was active or blocked. These methodologies were chosen to directly observe how the different EHV-1 strains interact with the interferon response in relevant equine respiratory tissues.

4

What are the implications of research findings about interferon's role in EHV-1 for understanding why some infections lead to abortions?

The research suggests that abortigenic strains of Equine Herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) may have developed unique ways to lessen the impact of interferon, potentially explaining their ability to cause more severe respiratory disease and abortions. While both abortigenic and neurovirulent strains trigger interferon production, the abortigenic strains might be able to counteract or even exploit the interferon response under certain conditions. This difference could be crucial in understanding why some EHV-1 infections lead to abortions while others result in neurological issues.

5

The study showed that a moderate concentration of interferon increased the replication of abortigenic EHV-1. What are the possible reasons for this anomaly and what was not addressed in the study?

The study showed a moderate concentration of recombinant equine IFNα (rEqIFNα) (100 U/ml) actually *increased* the replication of abortigenic EHV-1 in some horses, compared to a lower concentration (10 U/ml), whereas this was not seen with neurovirulent strains. The reason for this anomaly is not fully explained. The study did not focus on specific molecular mechanisms, which could explain how this occurs. Future research could explore specific genes or proteins that are differentially expressed or regulated in abortigenic strains in response to varying interferon concentrations. Identifying these factors could provide targets for new antiviral therapies.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.