Office worker protected in a bubble amidst dust and fumes.

Eczema and Rhinitis Outbreak: Unmasking the Hidden Dangers in Your Office

"Discover how indoor environments can trigger skin and respiratory issues, and what you can do to protect yourself and your colleagues."


Imagine going to work and developing skin rashes, a constantly runny nose, or other allergic symptoms seemingly out of nowhere. While it might sound unusual, outbreaks of eczema and rhinitis linked to indoor environments are more common than you think. These issues often stem from hidden factors in the workplace that, once identified, can be addressed to improve overall health and well-being.

A compelling case study published in the 'International Journal of Circumpolar Health' details an investigation into an outbreak of eczema and rhinitis among office workers in Greenland following a building renovation. The research highlights the potential impact of indoor air quality and building materials on employee health, offering valuable insights for creating safer and healthier workplaces.

In this article, we'll delve into the details of this investigation, explore the potential causes of these outbreaks, and provide practical tips for preventing and managing eczema and rhinitis in the office. You’ll learn what to look for, what questions to ask, and how to advocate for a healthier workspace for yourself and your colleagues.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Workplace Symptoms and Impact

Occupational rhinitis is an upper-airway inflammatory disease involving symptoms such as rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, sneezing, and itching that are directly linked to workplace exposures. An office investigation reported that, after intervention, 22 workers with eczema improved, all cases of hand eczema cleared, and 16 workers with rhinitis improved. Research also identifies allergic rhinitis as a condition that may reduce work productivity and create substantial economic costs.

Diagnosis and Its Limits

Occupational rhinitis remains underdiagnosed and can have substantial workplace and health consequences. Skin-prick testing or serum-specific IgE testing can document sensitization to a workplace agent and support a probable diagnosis, while specific nasal provocation testing remains the reference method for establishing a definite diagnosis. However, nasal provocation testing is difficult to perform in an office, time-consuming, and limited by the lack of standardized agents and the need for adapted protocols.

Recognizing the Office Connection

The office-worker outbreak helped demonstrate that workplace conditions can be relevant to both eczema and rhinitis investigations. After an office intervention, 22 workers with eczema reported significant improvement, all hand-eczema cases cleared, and 16 workers with rhinitis improved; positive patch tests to carpet extracts were also significantly more frequent among the workers than among 47 dermatitis controls. Occupational histories are often neglected when evaluating new patients with chronic rhinitis or dermatologic complaints, which can delay recognition of work-related disease.

The Greenland Office Outbreak: A Case Study in Workplace Health

Office worker protected in a bubble amidst dust and fumes.

In 2009, a bank in Greenland underwent a complete renovation, introducing new furniture and carpets. Shortly after moving back into the renovated building, a significant number of employees began experiencing troubling symptoms. Out of 80 workers, 32 reported skin problems such as eczema, rhinitis, and urticaria. This alarming situation prompted a thorough investigation to pinpoint the underlying causes.

The investigation involved a series of steps, including:

  • Clinical Examinations: Assessing the specific symptoms and their locations on the affected workers.
  • Patch Testing: Identifying potential allergens triggering skin reactions.
  • Skin Prick Tests and Histamine Release Tests: Evaluating immediate allergic responses.
  • Analysis of Building Materials: Testing carpets and other materials for substances that could cause skin and respiratory irritation.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

A Developing Evidence Base

Current research on office-related eczema and rhinitis remains developing rather than definitive. Findings may help identify workplace exposures and patterns of symptoms, but conclusions should be interpreted cautiously when evidence comes from individual investigations or limited groups of workers. Further research is needed to clarify causes, predictors, and effective management approaches.

Limits of Attribution

Not every eczema or rhinitis flare in an office can be attributed to the workplace. Symptoms may have multiple possible triggers, and available evidence may not establish a single cause in every affected worker. This uncertainty makes careful exposure assessment and clinical evaluation important.

Comparing Workplace Exposures

Workplace-related eczema and rhinitis cannot be compared reliably without considering differences in exposure, timing, symptoms, and diagnostic methods. An exposure associated with one office outbreak may not explain symptoms in another workplace. Comparisons should therefore remain cautious unless studies use sufficiently similar populations and methods.

The results of the investigation revealed a strong link between the reported symptoms and exposure to the newly renovated building. When the carpets were removed from the building, a significant number of workers reported improvements in their condition. Further tests revealed that carpet extracts triggered reactions in workers far more frequently than in a control group, pointing towards a key factor contributing to the outbreak.

Creating a Healthier Workplace for Everyone

The Greenland office outbreak serves as a powerful reminder of how indoor environments can impact our health. By understanding the potential risks and taking proactive steps to improve air quality and reduce exposure to allergens and irritants, you can create a healthier and more comfortable workspace for yourself and your colleagues. Stay informed, advocate for change, and prioritize your well-being in the office.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Connecting Symptoms to Setting

A practical interpretation of office-related eczema and rhinitis requires attention to both clinical symptoms and the work environment. Improvement after workplace intervention may support a connection, but it does not by itself establish that every suspected exposure caused the illness. The most useful approach is to combine symptom timing, exposure history, examination, and appropriate testing.

Improving Workplace Investigation

Future progress will depend on better ways to identify relevant workplace exposures and distinguish occupational disease from unrelated symptoms. Research may also improve diagnostic consistency and clarify which workers are most vulnerable. Until then, evaluations should acknowledge the limits of current evidence.

Methodological Challenges

Research on occupational exposure and eczema can produce inconsistent findings. A 2026 Frontiers report noted that studies using the OasJEM reached findings that were inconsistent with those of the study being discussed. Such differences highlight broader methodological and conceptual challenges in linking workplace exposure with particular eczema types.

Living With Workplace Symptoms

For affected workers, eczema and rhinitis can interfere with comfort, concentration, and confidence at work. The effects may be especially difficult when symptoms repeatedly appear in one setting but their cause is uncertain. Recognizing the worker's experience and investigating possible workplace links can support a more practical response.

Where the carpet explanation remains uncertain

  • Although carpet chemicals were suspected, investigators could not identify a definite triggering exposure.[1]
  • N-methylsaccharin appeared in extracts associated with positive reactions, but the evidence did not establish it as the cause.[2]
  • Bis(2-ethylhexyl) fumarate did not account for the pattern of positive carpet reactions, and testing it separately also produced negative results.[2]
  • The investigators did not find Densil P in the carpet extracts; they could not test whether heating during analysis produced the related substances they detected.[2]

A symptom investigation among Bank of Greenland office workers

Sample size80 workers; 32 reported work-related symptoms[1]
SettingBank of Greenland office in Greenland[1]
Effect size32 out of 80 workers (40%) developed symptoms[1]
Times cited5[1]

How this case fits the broader indoor-air evidence

The paper presents the Greenland investigation as an example of how varied symptoms and exposures can feature in sick-building cases, rather than as a simple single-exposure account.[1]

The paper also notes fungal and house dust mite allergens as possible contributors to rhinitis symptoms, but that background possibility does not establish their role in this office outbreak.[1]

What follow-up evidence would clarify the outbreak

  • Would chemical analysis under conditions that avoid possible heat-related changes clarify the identity of the carpet substances?[2]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.3402/ijch.v74.27919, Alternate LINK

Title: Outbreak Of Eczema And Rhinitis In A Group Of Office Workers In Greenland

Subject: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Journal: International Journal of Circumpolar Health

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Authors: Niels E. Ebbehøj, Tove Agner, Erik Zimerson, Magnus Bruze

Published: 2015-01-31

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are the initial signs of environmental factors causing eczema or rhinitis in an office setting?

Initial signs can include skin rashes indicating eczema, a constantly runny nose suggesting rhinitis, or other unexpected allergic symptoms. These symptoms may appear shortly after exposure to a specific indoor environment or after changes such as renovations or new furnishings. Identifying these early indicators is critical for initiating further investigation and implementing preventive measures to protect the health of employees. In the Greenland case study, the increase in workers reporting eczema, rhinitis, and urticaria after the bank renovation served as the initial sign that prompted a thorough investigation.

2

What specific investigative steps were taken to determine the cause of the eczema and rhinitis outbreak in the Greenland office?

The investigation in the Greenland office involved several key steps to identify the source of the outbreak. Clinical examinations were conducted to assess the specific symptoms and their locations on affected workers. Patch testing was performed to identify potential allergens triggering skin reactions. Skin prick tests and histamine release tests were used to evaluate immediate allergic responses. Additionally, analysis of building materials, particularly carpets, was carried out to test for substances that could cause skin and respiratory irritation. The combination of these methods helped pinpoint the carpets as a significant factor contributing to the outbreak.

3

How did removing the carpets in the Greenland office affect the employees' health conditions related to eczema and rhinitis?

Removing the carpets from the renovated bank in Greenland had a positive impact on the employees' health. A significant number of workers reported improvements in their skin and respiratory conditions after the carpets were removed. This observation, combined with the fact that carpet extracts triggered reactions in workers far more frequently than in a control group, strongly suggested that the carpets were a key factor contributing to the eczema and rhinitis outbreak. This underscores the importance of considering building materials as potential sources of indoor health issues.

4

Beyond the Greenland case study, what broader implications exist for workplace health and safety when considering indoor air quality and building materials?

The Greenland case study highlights the critical impact of indoor air quality and building materials on workplace health. It underscores the need for organizations to prioritize thorough testing and monitoring of air quality, especially after renovations or the introduction of new furnishings. The implications extend to the selection of building materials, emphasizing the importance of choosing low-emission and hypoallergenic options. Regular health assessments and employee feedback can also help identify potential triggers early, allowing for proactive interventions to prevent outbreaks of eczema, rhinitis, and other environmentally-related health issues.

5

What practical steps can employees and employers take to create a healthier office environment and mitigate the risk of eczema and rhinitis outbreaks?

To create a healthier office environment and reduce the risk of eczema and rhinitis outbreaks, several practical steps can be taken. Employers should ensure proper ventilation and air filtration systems are in place and regularly maintained. They should also select building materials and furnishings that are low in volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and allergens. Regular cleaning and maintenance can help minimize dust and mold accumulation. Employees can advocate for these measures, stay informed about potential indoor environmental hazards, and report any concerning symptoms promptly. Individual actions, such as using personal air purifiers or humidifiers, can also contribute to a healthier workspace.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.