House tangled in red tape, leading to affordable home

Decoding the Housing Crisis: Is Regulation the Hidden Culprit?

"New research uncovers the significant impact of housing regulations on affordability and supply, offering insights into potential solutions for a more accessible market."


The dream of owning a home is becoming increasingly elusive for many. Skyrocketing prices, limited supply, and complex market dynamics create a perfect storm of unaffordability. While factors like land costs and material prices are often cited, a less visible yet powerful force is at play: housing regulations.

Regulations, intended to ensure safety, quality, and community well-being, can inadvertently drive up costs and restrict the supply of new homes. This phenomenon, known as the "regulatory tax," adds a hidden burden to the already strained budgets of potential homeowners and renters. Understanding the extent of this regulatory impact is crucial for policymakers and anyone seeking to address the housing crisis.

A groundbreaking study, “Regulation and Frontier Housing Supply,” sheds light on this complex issue. By analyzing the Israeli housing market, the research offers a framework for quantifying the impact of regulations on housing costs and provides insights that resonate globally.

Unveiling the Hidden Costs: How Regulations Impact Housing

House tangled in red tape, leading to affordable home

The research highlights the difficulty in directly observing and measuring the impact of housing regulations. Diverse forms of regulation, coupled with inconsistent enforcement, make it challenging to quantify their effects. The study introduces the concept of "frontier cost," representing the non-land cost of producing housing in the absence of regulation, and "regulatory tax," which quantifies regulation in monetary terms.

By focusing on multi-floor, multi-family housing in urban environments and using apartment prices and building heights as key data points, the study demonstrates that the frontier cost can be identified without relying on traditional instrumental variables. This innovative approach allows for a more direct assessment of the regulatory burden.
  • Quantifying the Impact: The study estimates that regulatory tax accounts for a significant 48% of housing prices on average.
  • Geographical Variation: The regulatory tax varies significantly across locations, highlighting the localized nature of regulatory burdens.
  • Drivers of Regulation: Higher regulation is associated with proximity to the city center, higher density areas, and higher overall prices.
The research also acknowledges the role of housing quality. By constructing a lower bound for the regulatory tax that allows quality to differ systematically over location and time, the study provides a more nuanced understanding of the true cost of regulation. This lower bound is particularly useful when prices have increased, offering a more accurate assessment in dynamic markets.

Navigating the Regulatory Maze: Towards a More Affordable Future

The study's findings underscore the significant impact of housing regulations on affordability. By providing a framework for quantifying this impact, the research offers valuable insights for policymakers seeking to address the housing crisis. Creating a more streamlined and efficient regulatory environment could unlock the potential for increased housing supply and greater affordability, making the dream of homeownership a reality for more people.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.