Decoding the Future: Can Fractional Brownian Motion Beat the Market?

Fractional Brownian motion (fBm) is a mathematical model used in finance to describe the movement of asset prices, particularly those with serial correlation. Unlike the traditional Black-Scholes model, which assumes random price movements, fBm allows for the possibility of exploiting patterns in past price data. This is particularly relevant for arbitrage strategies, as fBm-driven markets present unique opportunities to generate risk-free profits, which are impossible in the efficient markets assumed by Black-Scholes. Pioneering studies by Shiryaev (1998) and Salopek (1998) provided the first theoretical proofs. By strategically buying high-priced and short-selling low-priced assets, one can, in theory, profit from price mean reversion, a characteristic of fBm markets. The core idea is to identify and capitalize on predictable deviations from an expected price path, which is at the heart of arbitrage.

The main challenges in applying continuous-time arbitrage strategies, based on Fractional Brownian Motion (fBm), revolve around the discrepancies between theoretical models and real-world trading conditions. Firstly, continuous-time models need to be adapted to discrete-time intervals, known as discretization. Secondly, real-world trading involves transaction costs, such as brokerage fees and slippage, which can significantly impact strategy performance. Research has shown that even minimal waiting times between transactions and proportional transaction costs can negate arbitrage opportunities in fractional Black-Scholes environments. Overcoming these challenges is crucial for translating the theoretical potential of fBm-based arbitrage into practical investment tools. Furthermore, market conditions, especially volatility, need to be considered and managed, which is a key aspect of the risk management.

Addressing discretization and transaction costs is critical for the successful implementation of arbitrage strategies in markets influenced by Fractional Brownian Motion (fBm). Discretization involves adapting continuous-time models to discrete trading intervals, which requires careful consideration of the frequency of trading and the accuracy of the model. Transaction costs, including brokerage fees and slippage, must be incorporated into the strategy design. Research suggests that by carefully discretizing the strategies and considering transaction costs, it may be possible to identify configurations that offer positive expected payoffs with controlled risk. Monte Carlo Simulations play a key role here, helping to test the strategies under various market conditions and to quantify potential losses and probabilities. This approach is aligned with the principles of statistical arbitrage.

Monte Carlo simulations and risk management are essential tools in evaluating and implementing arbitrage strategies based on Fractional Brownian Motion (fBm). Monte Carlo simulations are used to test the performance of strategies under various market conditions, allowing investors to understand the potential range of outcomes and the probabilities associated with them. This involves simulating asset price movements based on the fBm model and then applying the arbitrage strategy to these simulated price paths. Risk management involves evaluating potential losses and probabilities, and setting appropriate risk limits to protect capital. Understanding the potential for losses is essential for investors to make informed decisions and to avoid excessive risk. The strategies by Garcin (2022) and Xiang and Deng (2024) are usually tested by Monte Carlo Simulations before implementation.

Beyond discretization and transaction costs, several other factors should be considered when developing arbitrage strategies based on Fractional Brownian Motion (fBm). First, the specific characteristics of the assets being traded, such as liquidity and volatility, play a crucial role. Highly liquid assets are easier to trade without significantly impacting prices, while higher volatility increases the potential for both profits and losses. Second, the accuracy of the fBm model and the quality of the historical data used to estimate its parameters are vital. Robust parameter estimation is essential to correctly identify arbitrage opportunities. Finally, the ability to adapt the strategy to changing market conditions is essential for long-term success. Recent research highlights that simpler, more flexible strategies may offer an attractive alternative to complex ones. Ongoing monitoring and refinement of the strategy are necessary to ensure its effectiveness.