Nigerian cityscape with financial charts overlaid, symbolizing IFRS reporting standards and economic performance.

Decoding IFRS: How Disclosure Impacts Nigerian Companies' Performance

"Navigating international financial reporting standards (IFRS) in Nigeria: A guide to disclosure practices, company performance, and investment insights"


In today's globalized economy, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are crucial for creating financial statements that are both transparent and reliable for investors. Nigeria, like many other countries, has adopted IFRS to improve the quality of financial reporting and attract international investment. But how well are Nigerian companies adhering to these standards, and what impact does it have on their financial performance?

A recent study examined the disclosure practices of companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) over six years (2012-2017). The study developed a disclosure index to assess both mandatory and voluntary IFRS disclosures, then analyzed their relationship to company performance, measured by return on capital employed (ROCE).

This article unpacks the study's findings, revealing the key factors that influence IFRS disclosure in Nigeria and what it means for investors and policymakers.

IFRS Disclosure and Financial Performance: What the Research Reveals

Nigerian cityscape with financial charts overlaid, symbolizing IFRS reporting standards and economic performance.

The study pooled data from 384 firm-year observations across 64 sampled companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE). Researchers developed a disclosure index of both IFRSs mandatory and voluntary by applying content analysis and multiple regression techniques and analyze the association of disclosure and performance of the firms expressed return on capital employed (ROCE) as a performance index. The study also examined the relationship between market-based performance, company attributes, and overall disclosure.

One of the most striking findings was that the extent of overall IFRS disclosure did not significantly correlate with the financial performance (ROCE) of the listed Nigerian firms. This suggests that simply disclosing more information doesn't automatically translate into better financial results. This seemingly counterintuitive result aligns with some previous studies. It indicates that unprofitable organizations may disclose more information to justify their poor performance, or that the cost of extensive disclosure may outweigh the benefits.

  • Share Price Matters: The study found that share price, company size, and audit firm size were significantly and positively related to the overall disclosure of firms. This suggests that companies with higher share prices and larger market capitalization tend to be more transparent in their financial reporting.
  • The "Big 4" Effect: The study also found a strong positive correlation between the size of the audit firm (specifically, whether a company was audited by one of the "Big 4" firms – Ernst & Young, Deloitte, KPMG, and PwC) and the extent of IFRS disclosure. This implies that companies audited by these large, reputable firms tend to have more comprehensive disclosures.
  • Leverage and Age: The study found no significant relationship between leverage, company age, and overall disclosure index
These findings highlight the complexities of IFRS implementation in Nigeria. While increased disclosure is generally seen as a positive step, it's not a guaranteed path to improved financial performance. Other factors, such as company size, market capitalization, and the quality of the audit firm, play a significant role in shaping disclosure practices.

Implications for Investors and Policymakers

This research offers valuable insights for investors and policymakers in Nigeria. For investors, it underscores the importance of looking beyond the sheer volume of IFRS disclosure and considering other factors, such as company size, share price, and the reputation of the audit firm, when evaluating investment opportunities. For policymakers, the study highlights the need to promote high-quality auditing practices and ensure that companies are providing relevant and decision-useful information to investors. Continuous training and resources for companies on IFRS implementation are also crucial to improving the overall quality of financial reporting in Nigeria.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1080/23311975.2018.1542967, Alternate LINK

Title: International Financial Reporting Standards (Ifrs) Disclosure And Performance Of Nigeria Listed Companies

Subject: Marketing

Journal: Cogent Business & Management

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Authors: N Grace Ofoegbu, Ndubuisi Odoemelam

Published: 2018-01-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

According to research, what's the relationship between the extent of IFRS disclosure and financial performance (ROCE) for listed Nigerian firms?

A study examining companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) found that overall IFRS disclosure levels did not significantly correlate with return on capital employed (ROCE). This surprising result may mean that underperforming companies increase disclosure to justify poor results, or that extensive disclosure costs outweigh benefits. It highlights that simply disclosing more IFRS information does not automatically lead to better financial results.

2

What company characteristics were found to be significantly related to the overall level of IFRS disclosure by Nigerian firms, according to the study?

The research indicated that companies with higher share prices demonstrated greater overall IFRS disclosure. This implies a link between market valuation and transparency in financial reporting. Also, the study suggests companies with larger market capitalization tend to be more transparent in their financial reporting. However, the study didn't find a significant relationship between leverage, company age, and the overall disclosure index.

3

How does the size of the audit firm, especially engagement of "Big 4" firms, influence the extent of IFRS disclosure among Nigerian companies?

The study revealed a strong, positive correlation between companies audited by the "Big 4" audit firms (Ernst & Young, Deloitte, KPMG, and PwC) and the extent of IFRS disclosure. This suggests that engaging these reputable firms leads to more comprehensive adherence to IFRS standards. This may be because Big 4 firms have more resources and expertise in IFRS.

4

Based on the study's findings, what are the key implications for investors and policymakers regarding IFRS disclosure in Nigeria?

Investors should consider factors beyond the volume of IFRS disclosures, such as company size, share price, and the reputation of the audit firm. Policymakers should focus on promoting high-quality auditing practices and ensuring companies provide relevant, decision-useful information. Continuous IFRS training and resources are crucial to improving financial reporting quality in Nigeria. It's also important to note the study did not explore specific industry effects or the impact of macroeconomic factors, which could provide a more nuanced understanding.

5

Can you describe the methodology used in the study to assess IFRS disclosure and its impact on company performance, and what aspects of disclosure were not considered?

The study focused on the period 2012-2017 and examined the relationship between IFRS disclosure and return on capital employed (ROCE). It developed a disclosure index to assess both mandatory and voluntary disclosures, and used multiple regression techniques to analyze the association of disclosure and performance. The study did not explore whether these relationships hold true when considering other performance metrics, such as earnings per share or return on equity, nor did it discuss the qualitative aspects of the disclosures.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.