A child builds a ladder of blocks to reach the sky, representing growth restored by biologic therapy.

Biologic Therapy and Kids: Can It Kickstart Growth?

"New study explores how biologic treatments influence growth in children battling chronic inflammatory diseases, offering hope for improved development."


Chronic inflammatory connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are a group of conditions that cause long-term inflammation, and children are impacted heavily. Beyond the more obvious symptoms, one sneaky complication that flies under the radar is how these diseases can stunt growth. This happens due to the inflammation and also because of treatments like glucocorticoids (GCS), which, while helpful, can also mess with a kid's growth rate.

These growth issues are most obvious in kids with juvenile spondyloarthropathies and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). How long they've had the disease and how active the inflammation is are big factors in how much their growth is affected. But there's good news! Biologic therapies are coming in to change the game, helping to calm down disease activity and cut back on those high doses of steroids. The aim? To get these kids growing normally again.

A recent study took a closer look at just how much of an impact these biologic therapies have on growth in children with chronic inflammatory CTDs. The goal was simple: to figure out if these advanced treatments can really help kids get back on track when it comes to growing.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Growth Challenges in Children with Chronic Conditions

Growth retardation remains a significant concern for children with chronic inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. When systemic inflammation persists, it can disrupt normal growth patterns, potentially leading to long-term height deficits and associated psychosocial impacts. The precise prevalence varies across different pediatric populations and underlying diagnoses, but the issue represents an important intersection of disease management and developmental outcomes that clinicians must monitor throughout childhood.

Traditional Growth Monitoring and Intervention Methods

Standard approaches to monitoring childhood growth have historically relied on growth charts and height velocity measurements taken at regular intervals. When growth failure is identified, interventions typically address underlying disease activity alongside nutritional support and endocrine evaluation. However, these conventional methods may not always capture the nuanced relationship between disease control and growth potential, and pharmacologic interventions carry their own considerations regarding timing, dosing, and potential side effects in developing children.

Establishing Growth Standards and Developmental Benchmarks

The World Health Organization developed Child Growth Standards using data from the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study, establishing international benchmarks for physical growth curves and motor milestone achievement. Developmental milestones are categorized across domains including gross motor, fine motor, language, cognition, social growth, and emotional growth. Studies have established average ages at which specific milestones are reached, along with ranges of typical development, providing clinicians with systematic frameworks for assessing children's developmental trajectories and identifying potential growth concerns.

Unlocking Growth: How Biologic Therapies Work

A child builds a ladder of blocks to reach the sky, representing growth restored by biologic therapy.

Researchers dove into the data of 24 young patients with CTDs, all being treated with some form of biologic therapy. These included TNF-alpha blockers like etanercept, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as an interleukin-6 receptor blocker called tocilizumab. The team checked in on these kids at three key points: when their disease first showed up, when they started on biologic treatments, and then regularly for the next one to two years.

The main thing they were tracking? Growth rate. They also kept tabs on how much GCS each child was taking, the specific biologic therapy they were on, and how long they were on it. All of this was to figure out exactly how these factors play into growth.

  • What They Found: At the start, the kids' height measurements (height SDS) were a bit off, averaging 0.36 ±1.07 at disease onset and dropping to -0.13 ±1.02 when they started biologic therapy. But as they continued with the biologic treatment, things started to look up.
  • Growth Spurt: Over 70% of the kids saw their growth velocity pick up. On average, their height SDS improved by 0.51 ±0.58 during the two years they were on biologic therapy.
  • Lower Steroid Doses: In almost half the cases, the kids were able to cut their GCS down to zero, which is a big win since these drugs can really hinder growth.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Biologic Therapies and Growth Outcomes in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

A systematic review published in 2025 examined the impact of biologic treatments on growth retardation in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The review analyzed twelve studies published between 2003 and 2018, encompassing 1,513 patients with a mean age of 11.4 years, following PRISMA guidelines to assess growth outcomes. Children with JIA often experience growth retardation due to various factors, and biologic therapies have revolutionized the management of aggressive forms of this condition. The systematic review aimed to provide updated insights into how these treatments influence growth parameters in pediatric patients.

Challenges and Limitations in Biologic Therapy for Pediatric Growth

Despite promising research findings, biologic therapies for enhancing pediatric growth face several challenges that warrant consideration. Treatment responses can vary significantly among individual patients, and not all children may experience the same degree of growth improvement. The long-term safety profiles of biologic agents in developing children continue to require careful monitoring, and the specialized nature of these treatments may limit accessibility for some patient populations. Additionally, factors such as disease duration and inflammatory activity levels can influence growth outcomes independently of therapeutic intervention.

Evaluating Biologic Approaches Against Conventional Treatments

When comparing biologic therapies to traditional treatment approaches for pediatric growth concerns, several factors merit consideration. Conventional management typically focuses on disease control and nutritional optimization, while biologic agents target specific inflammatory pathways implicated in growth suppression. The selection of appropriate therapy often depends on the underlying condition, disease severity, and individual patient characteristics. While biologic treatments represent an advancement in managing aggressive inflammatory conditions, they are generally considered as part of a comprehensive treatment strategy rather than standalone solutions for growth promotion.

The study made it clear: biologic agents can really help restore growth velocity in children with CTDs. They do this not only by reducing inflammation but also by cutting down the amount of steroids these kids need to take.

The Bigger Picture: Why This Matters

For families dealing with chronic inflammatory conditions, this study offers some real hope. It highlights how biologic therapies can be a game-changer, not just in managing the disease but also in helping kids achieve healthy growth. By targeting inflammation and reducing the need for steroids, these treatments pave the way for a brighter, taller future.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Integrating Evidence into Clinical Practice

The evidence regarding biologic therapies and pediatric growth suggests that controlling underlying inflammatory disease remains central to supporting normal growth trajectories in affected children. Clinical decision-making must balance potential benefits against treatment risks, considering factors such as disease activity, patient age, and developmental stage. Ongoing monitoring of growth parameters alongside disease markers provides the best framework for assessing treatment effectiveness and making timely adjustments to therapeutic strategies.

Expanding Biologic Therapy Market and Pediatric Applications

The global biologic therapy market is experiencing substantial growth, with projections indicating the market could expand from approximately 308.65 billion USD in 2024 to over 450 billion USD by 2035. The United States represents a significant portion of this market, estimated at 70.22 billion USD in 2024 with projected growth to 107.77 billion USD by 2035. Industry analyses project compound annual growth rates ranging from 3.49% to 6.8% depending on market segment and geographic focus, with monoclonal antibodies representing a notable share of the biologic therapy landscape.

Addressing Systemic Barriers to Pediatric Biologic Access

Implementing biologic therapies for pediatric growth challenges requires navigating broader healthcare system considerations, including insurance coverage, specialist availability, and geographic access to treatment centers. The specialized nature of these therapies demands coordinated care among multiple healthcare providers, which can be particularly challenging in underserved regions. Ensuring equitable access to emerging biologic treatments while maintaining appropriate clinical oversight represents an ongoing challenge for healthcare systems serving pediatric populations.

Real-World Adherence and Patient Outcomes

Research examining real-world adherence to biologic therapies reveals that maintaining consistent treatment represents a significant factor in achieving optimal outcomes. Studies have documented that the activity of the inflammatory process has a significant impact on growth profiles in children with chronic inflammatory conditions. When examining growth outcomes in children receiving biologic therapy, duration of disease and timing of treatment initiation influence results. These findings underscore the importance of early intervention and sustained treatment adherence to maximize potential growth benefits.

How growth changes compare with the starting point

  • 1.9 cm/yDuring infliximab therapy, height velocity rose from 3.6 cm/y at baseline to 5.5 cm/y at six months, an increase of 1.9 cm/y. These are group-level values; the reported ranges overlap.[1]

Growth results vary across treatments and reports

Other reports also describe improved growth measures: etanercept was associated with a rise in height SDS in prepubertal patients, while the change in pubertal patients did not reach statistical significance. A tocilizumab report found a significant improvement in height-velocity SDS when comparing the year before baseline with the year after it.[2] [3]

A proposed biological context is that proinflammatory cytokines, especially IL-6, may inhibit synthesis of IGF-1 and IGF-BP-3. In systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, increased IL-6 production is also associated with growth retardation and other clinical features; these associations do not by themselves show that changing IL-6 causes a particular child's growth response.[4] [5]

What further growth evidence would need to clarify

  • Would growth changes remain different across pubertal stages when children are followed over comparable treatment periods? The reported infliximab results vary by Tanner stage, while the etanercept results distinguish prepubertal from pubertal patients.[2] [6]
  • How much of the observed growth pattern reflects disease control, and how much reflects the treatment itself? Growth improvement among responders suggests a link with better disease control, but reports also differ on whether biologics improve growth or mainly maintain height.[7] [8]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are chronic inflammatory connective tissue diseases (CTDs), and why do they impact children's growth?

Chronic inflammatory connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are conditions characterized by long-term inflammation, which can significantly affect children's growth. This occurs because the inflammation itself can directly interfere with the growth process. Furthermore, treatments like glucocorticoids (GCS), often used to manage these conditions, can also negatively impact a child's growth rate. The combination of the disease's inflammatory effects and the side effects of treatments can lead to stunted growth in children with CTDs.

2

How do biologic therapies help children with chronic inflammatory conditions to grow?

Biologic therapies, such as TNF-alpha blockers like etanercept, adalimumab, and golimumab, and an interleukin-6 receptor blocker called tocilizumab, play a crucial role in restoring growth in children with CTDs. These therapies work by targeting and reducing the inflammation caused by the disease. By decreasing inflammation, these treatments allow the body to resume normal growth patterns. Additionally, biologic therapies can reduce the need for high doses of steroids (GCS), which are known to hinder growth. In the study, over 70% of the children experienced an improved growth velocity and almost half were able to eliminate the use of GCS altogether.

3

What specific biologic therapies were used in the study, and how were they administered?

The study involved 24 young patients with CTDs, all of whom were treated with various biologic therapies. These included TNF-alpha blockers, such as etanercept, adalimumab, and golimumab, which work by blocking the action of TNF-alpha, a protein that promotes inflammation. Additionally, an interleukin-6 receptor blocker called tocilizumab was used; this therapy targets interleukin-6, another key player in the inflammatory process. The patients were monitored at three key points: at disease onset, at the start of biologic therapy, and regularly over the next one to two years. Researchers tracked their growth rate, GCS usage, the specific biologic therapy they were on, and its duration.

4

What were the key findings regarding the impact of biologic therapies on growth in children with CTDs?

The study revealed significant improvements in growth among children treated with biologic therapies. Initially, the height measurements (height SDS) of the children were slightly below average, but they improved as they continued with biologic treatments. Over 70% of the children showed an increase in growth velocity. Furthermore, the use of GCS was reduced in almost half the cases, with some children being able to stop using steroids completely. These findings highlight that biologic therapies can effectively restore growth velocity by reducing inflammation and allowing for lower steroid doses.

5

What is the broader significance of these findings for families dealing with chronic inflammatory conditions?

The study offers significant hope for families dealing with chronic inflammatory conditions in children. It demonstrates that biologic therapies can be a game-changer, not only in managing the disease but also in helping children achieve healthy growth. By effectively reducing inflammation and mitigating the need for growth-inhibiting steroids, these treatments pave the way for a brighter future, allowing children to reach their full growth potential. This offers reassurance and improved quality of life for children and their families, managing both disease symptoms and their growth concerns.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.