Invisible Wounds of War: A visual representation of the mental health challenges faced by soldiers and civilians affected by conflict.

Beyond the Battlefield: Understanding and Healing the Invisible Wounds of War

"A deep dive into the neuropsychiatric impact of conflict on soldiers and civilians, and pathways to effective mental healthcare."


War leaves scars that are not always visible. Beyond the physical wounds and destroyed landscapes, conflicts inflict profound psychological trauma on individuals and communities. Soldiers, civilians, refugees, and those living in war zones often grapple with lasting mental health challenges that can reshape their lives.

The conflict in the Donbass region of Ukraine serves as a stark reminder of these hidden consequences. A recent study published in CNS Spectrums sheds light on the neuropsychiatric characteristics of antiterrorist operation (ATO) combatants in the Donbass, offering valuable insights into the mental healthcare needs of those affected by war.

This analysis delves into the study's findings, exploring the specific psychological challenges faced by ATO combatants, comparing their experiences to those of other trauma survivors, and highlighting effective therapeutic strategies for managing the mental health toll of conflict. It's not just about soldiers; understanding the broader impact on refugees, migrants, and civilians is crucial for fostering healing and resilience in war-torn regions.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

The Invisible Burden of War

War can leave lasting physical, psychological, and social effects on service members, civilians, families, and communities. The full scale of these invisible wounds is difficult to measure because experiences and access to care vary widely. Understanding the impact therefore requires attention to both immediate distress and longer-term recovery.

How War Is Defined and Tracked

The U.S. Department of War describes its mission as providing military forces to deter war and protect national security. Wikipedia defines war as armed conflict involving states, governmental forces, or organized groups capable of sustaining military operations. These institutional and definitional approaches help identify conflicts, but they do not by themselves explain the human consequences of war or measure invisible wounds. Live conflict reporting, such as The World Now's map covering Ukraine, Gaza, Sudan, and Yemen, adds current information but remains focused on events, strikes, severity ratings, and market impact rather than healing.

A Developing Understanding

Recognition of war's psychological and social effects has developed over time alongside changing medical, military, and public-health perspectives. Earlier accounts often emphasized visible injuries, while later approaches have increasingly considered trauma, grief, displacement, and family disruption. The historical record is therefore best understood as an evolving effort to recognize and respond to harms that may not be immediately visible.

What Are the Hidden Mental Scars of War?

Invisible Wounds of War: A visual representation of the mental health challenges faced by soldiers and civilians affected by conflict.

The study, led by researchers from Ukraine and Italy, examined 54 ATO combatants and compared them to individuals who had experienced other emergencies, such as the Chernobyl disaster and the war in Afghanistan. The researchers assessed neuropsychiatric features through psychological evaluations, neurological examinations, and quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG).

The findings revealed a cluster of challenges specific to ATO combatants. These included:

  • Low self-rated health and somatic concerns
  • High prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
  • Anxiety and insomnia
  • Depression and social dysfunction
  • Mild cognitive impairment
  • Neurological soft signs
  • Abnormalities in qEEG suggestive of corticolimbic system irritation
  • Post-conflict personality changes
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Evidence Still Evolves

Research on the invisible wounds of war continues to examine how trauma affects individuals, families, and communities. Findings may vary according to the population studied, the type of conflict, the timing of assessment, and access to treatment. Current evidence should therefore be interpreted carefully, with attention to uncertainty and differences among people affected by war.

Limits of Real-Time Conflict Tracking

WarWatch presents a live map of 2026 active conflicts, including Ukraine, Iran, Israel-Lebanon, Sudan, and the Red Sea, with Reuters, AP, and BBC news refreshed every five minutes. This rapid reporting can help show where conflicts are active and how quickly conditions change. However, a real-time conflict tracker primarily documents events and news updates, so it cannot by itself establish the prevalence, causes, or treatment needs associated with invisible wounds.

Different Conflicts, Different Needs

Comparing the effects of war requires care because conflicts differ in duration, intensity, geography, displacement patterns, and available support. Similar symptoms may arise from very different experiences, while people exposed to the same conflict may respond differently. A useful comparison should therefore consider both shared patterns of harm and the specific circumstances shaping each population's recovery.

These symptoms were similar to those observed in individuals affected by the Chernobyl disaster and veterans of the Afghan War, highlighting the common neuropsychiatric consequences of exposure to trauma and conflict. What sets this study apart is its comprehensive approach, considering not only the immediate aftermath of war but also the long-term psychological impact and potential for personality changes.

Hope and Healing After the Storm: Pathways to Recovery

The study emphasizes a comprehensive approach to treatment, integrating psychotropic drugs with various psychotherapies. This holistic strategy, drawing on experiences from managing the Chernobyl disaster and supporting war veterans, offers a framework for assessing and providing mental healthcare to ATO combatants, refugees, and migrants from the Donbass. The authors suggest that voluntary participation in war doesn't eliminate the risk of neuropsychiatric consequences, underscoring the need for proactive mental health support for all involved.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Healing Requires a Broad View

The invisible wounds of war cannot be understood through battlefield events alone. A complete view must include psychological distress, relationships, community conditions, access to care, and the pressures that continue after violence ends. This broader perspective supports responses that address both individual healing and the environments in which recovery takes place.

Building Better Responses

Future work may focus on identifying invisible wounds earlier, expanding access to appropriate support, and adapting care to different cultures and conflict settings. Progress will depend on combining clinical knowledge with community-based and trauma-informed approaches. Because the effects of war can unfold over years, research and services will need to support long-term recovery rather than only immediate crisis response.

Recovery Beyond the Individual

Invisible wounds are shaped by broader conditions, including safety, displacement, poverty, stigma, family disruption, and the availability of health services. These factors can make recovery harder even when a person receives some form of treatment. Addressing war-related harm therefore requires coordination across health care, social services, communities, and institutions.

People Behind the Conflict

Behind every conflict are people living with fear, loss, disrupted routines, and uncertainty about the future. Invisible wounds may affect identity, relationships, work, education, and the ability to feel safe long after fighting has stopped. Listening to affected people and respecting the differences in their experiences are essential parts of meaningful healing.

The Donbass combatant study and its assessment methods

PopulationATO combatants[1]
Sample size54[1]
ComparisonFour groups of subjects exposed to other emergencies, including the Chernobyl disaster and the war in Afghanistan[1]
Times cited12[1]

How later work places the Donbass findings

A separate study reports clinical cut-off levels for anxiety, depression, and insomnia among Ukrainian combatants, while another reports PTSD and complex PTSD diagnoses in a combat-exposed rehabilitation sample. These results concern different samples and measures, so they should not be read as direct replications of the Donbass findings.[2] [3]

Questions the evidence leaves open

  • How might the observed pattern differ across combatants with different degrees of exposure or different experiences of participation?[1]

Terms used in the study

qEEG
Quantitative electroencephalography, one of the methods used to assess neuropsychiatric features.[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1017/s1092852917000190, Alternate LINK

Title: Neuropsychiatric Characteristics Of Antiterrorist Operation Combatants In The Donbass (Ukraine)

Subject: Psychiatry and Mental health

Journal: CNS Spectrums

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Authors: Konstantin N. Loganovsky, Natalia A. Zdanevich, Marina V. Gresko, Donatella Marazziti, Tatiana K. Loganovskaja

Published: 2017-08-15

Everything You Need To Know

1

What specific mental health challenges did the ATO combatants experience, and how were these assessed?

The ATO combatants exhibited a range of neuropsychiatric challenges. The study, published in CNS Spectrums, revealed that these included low self-rated health, somatic concerns, high prevalence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), anxiety, insomnia, depression, social dysfunction, mild cognitive impairment, neurological soft signs, abnormalities in qEEG suggestive of corticolimbic system irritation, and post-conflict personality changes. Researchers from Ukraine and Italy assessed these features through a combination of psychological evaluations, neurological examinations, and quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) to gain a comprehensive understanding of their mental state.

2

How does the impact on ATO combatants compare to the effects on individuals from other traumatic events like the Chernobyl disaster and the war in Afghanistan?

The study revealed that the neuropsychiatric consequences experienced by ATO combatants closely resemble those observed in individuals affected by the Chernobyl disaster and veterans of the Afghan War. This highlights that exposure to trauma and conflict, regardless of the specific context, can lead to similar mental health challenges. The study emphasizes the commonality of these experiences, providing valuable insights into the broader impact of trauma across different populations.

3

What is the significance of the study's comprehensive approach in understanding the mental health needs of those affected by war?

The study's comprehensive approach is significant because it considers not only the immediate aftermath of war but also the long-term psychological impact and potential personality changes. By examining the neuropsychiatric characteristics of ATO combatants through psychological evaluations, neurological examinations, and qEEG, the study provides a holistic view of the mental health challenges faced by those affected by war. This approach is crucial for developing effective therapeutic strategies and providing appropriate mental healthcare for ATO combatants, refugees, and migrants from the Donbass.

4

What are the key therapeutic strategies suggested for recovery, and why is a holistic approach important?

The study emphasizes a comprehensive approach to treatment that integrates psychotropic drugs with various psychotherapies. This holistic strategy, drawing on experiences from managing the Chernobyl disaster and supporting war veterans, offers a framework for assessing and providing mental healthcare to ATO combatants, refugees, and migrants from the Donbass. The importance of a holistic approach lies in addressing the complex interplay of psychological, emotional, and neurological factors involved in trauma recovery. Such an approach can facilitate more effective and sustainable healing, considering the diverse needs of individuals.

5

How does voluntary participation in war affect the risk of neuropsychiatric consequences, and what does this mean for mental health support?

The authors suggest that voluntary participation in war does not eliminate the risk of neuropsychiatric consequences. This underscores the critical need for proactive mental health support for all individuals involved in conflict, regardless of their level of involvement. It emphasizes the importance of providing accessible and comprehensive mental healthcare to ATO combatants, refugees, and migrants, ensuring they receive the support they need to navigate the challenges of trauma and foster their healing and resilience. The statement highlights that anyone exposed to the environment of war has a risk factor.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.