Fractured hourglass representing years of life lost due to health disparities.

Beyond Premature Death: Why Global Health Goals Need a Rethink

"Current frameworks undervalue younger lives lost to substance use. Discover how a shift in measurement could save more years of healthy life."


Global health frameworks worldwide currently emphasize preventing premature mortality, often by focusing on extending overall lifespans. This approach treats all premature deaths as equal, regardless of when they occur, and often overlooks the long-term effects of disability. To truly gauge health improvements, benchmarks should be rooted in summary health indicators like disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) or health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE), especially where data on disabling conditions is available. Alternatively, focusing on reducing years of life lost or improving life expectancies can provide useful insights where disability data is lacking.

The current emphasis on premature mortality is evident in the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals 2030, which aim to reduce premature mortality from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) by one-third. Similarly, the World Health Organization's Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013-2020 targets a 25% relative reduction in premature mortality from cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory diseases. With limited resources, major global health goals need refining.

We argue that global goals should be reformulated to account for non-fatal health outcomes, utilizing summary health measures. Where this isn't feasible, differential weighting of deaths at different ages—measured by years of life lost—is crucial. Equal valuation of deaths disregards the significant health loss when younger people die, particularly from causes like alcohol and illicit drug use. Conversely, tobacco use often impacts older individuals more. Relying solely on premature mortality reductions may not effectively improve population health, especially regarding substance use.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

The limits of mortality targets

The WHO’s “25 × 25” strategy set a goal of reducing mortality from non-communicable diseases by 25% by 2025. Its standard approach has the advantage of simplicity, but the source says it also has major weaknesses. A proposed alternative quantitative target is to avoid 40% of premature deaths in each country—defined as under-70 deaths expected in the 2030 population at 2010 death rates—and improve health care at all ages.

The Unequal Impact of Premature Death: Age Matters

Fractured hourglass representing years of life lost due to health disparities.

To illustrate the discrepancies, data from the Global Burden of Disease study were analyzed across several countries (China, India, Brazil, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Globally, a significant proportion of deaths (47.6%) occur in individuals aged 70 and older and are not considered premature within current frameworks. High-income countries show a higher percentage of non-premature deaths compared to lower- and upper-middle-income countries, where infant mortality still accounts for a substantial 9.1% of all deaths.

The impact of tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use on mortality varies significantly by age. Deaths attributable to tobacco tend to occur later in life, while alcohol and illicit drugs often cause premature deaths. In 2016, 48.7% of deaths caused by tobacco occurred in people 70 years and older, compared to 28.7% for alcohol and 14.2% for illicit drugs. Tobacco caused 3.7 million premature deaths compared to 2.0 million for alcohol and only 0.4 million for illicit drugs.

  • Tobacco: Premature deaths primarily affect those aged 40-69 (93.3%).
  • Alcohol: Impacts mostly adults (81.0%)
  • Illicit Drugs: Significant impact on younger adults (65.2%).
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Research tracks child survival and preterm birth

A 2026 Frontiers article defines preterm birth as delivery before 37 completed weeks of gestation and describes it as the leading cause of death among children under five. It says that, despite initiatives including the Every Newborn Action Plan and the Sustainable Development Goals, the absolute burden of preterm birth remains a concern. A separate 2026 study reports that intrapartum-related events and complications of preterm birth remain leading causes of neonatal deaths, while a slowdown in neonatal mortality decline in many low- and middle-income countries threatens progress toward SDG 3.2.

Measure health beyond deaths

The authors argue that limited resources for health make the design of global goals important. They propose that major frameworks account for non-fatal health outcomes using summary health measures. Where that is not feasible, they suggest weighting deaths differently by age, using measures such as years of life lost to premature mortality.

The data underscores that tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs predominantly affect adults (15 years and older), given that substance-related health effects typically arise from direct usage. This perspective suggests tailored interventions are necessary based on a country’s specific demographic and substance use patterns.

Rethinking Health Priorities: A Call for Nuance

In lower- and middle-income countries, where infant mortality remains a pressing issue, resources may be better allocated to addressing infant health. However, in regions where substance use during pregnancy is prevalent, integrating targeted health policies can yield significant benefits for infants. High-income countries grapple with alcohol and illicit drug-related deaths occurring at younger ages, leading to stagnating or declining life expectancies and growing health inequalities. Prioritizing the prevention of these deaths becomes crucial.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

A broader view of health-system goals

The Lancet Commission’s Global Health 2050 report says that countries choosing to do so could halve the probability of premature death—death before age 70—by 2050, relative to 2019 levels. The report also describes health systems as serving several goals: preventing disease and reducing its severity, improving quality of life at all ages, reducing premature mortality, responding to everyday health concerns, and protecting people from catastrophic health-service expenditures. Together, these points frame mortality reduction as one important health-system aim among several.

A 2050 target for premature death

The Lancet Commission on Investing in Health concludes that focused health investments could enable dramatic improvements in human welfare by mid-century. Its Global Health 2050 goal is for countries choosing to pursue it to reduce by 50% the probability of dying before age 70 by 2050, compared with 2019 levels. The source presents this as a possible goal, not a guaranteed outcome.

Mortality goals and people’s lives

The Lancet Commission’s Global Health 2050 report says that focused health investments could bring dramatic improvements in human welfare by mid-century. It reports that countries choosing to act can halve their populations’ probability of premature death, defined in the source as the probability of dying before age 70. Separately, the SDG 3.4 target seeks to reduce premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by one-third between 2015 and 2030.

Given the varying age distributions of deaths and considering the influence of social inequalities (where lower social status correlates with younger mortality), a nuanced approach to health priorities is essential. Current metrics focused solely on premature mortality obscure these critical distinctions.

Alternative benchmarks, such as reducing years of life lost (YLL), offer a more comprehensive view. By capturing the unequal health loss caused by deaths at different ages and factoring in non-fatal outcomes, policymakers can craft more effective and equitable health strategies that address the specific challenges within their populations.

Where the measurement case is weakest

  • DALYs and HALE depend on estimates of disabling conditions, which may be difficult to obtain and may be hard for decision-makers to interpret.[1]

The study at a glance

PopulationPeople in China, India, Brazil, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States[1]
SettingGlobal health frameworks and countries[1]
Effect size48.7% of deaths caused by tobacco occurred among people 70 years of age and older[1]
Times cited4[1]

What a follow-up would need to show

  • How would summary health measures or age-weighted mortality targets change rankings of health priorities across countries with different age patterns of death?[1]
  • Can the prevalence data needed for DALYs or HALE be collected consistently enough to support comparisons where disabling-condition data are currently difficult to use?[1]

Questions about the study

What does the paper mean by years of life lost?

It is an alternative benchmark for premature mortality that captures the unequal health loss associated with deaths at different ages.[1]

Why might countries need different health priorities?

The distribution of deaths by age differs across countries, so mortality measures can fail to reflect their distinct health priorities.[1]

Terms used in the paper

Years of life lost (YLL)
A measure of health loss from premature mortality.[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1111/add.14485, Alternate LINK

Title: Substance Use And The Objectives Of Current Global Health Frameworks: Measurement Matters

Subject: Psychiatry and Mental health

Journal: Addiction

Publisher: Wiley

Authors: Kevin D. Shield, Jürgen Rehm

Published: 2018-11-16

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the main focus of current global health initiatives and what are its limitations?

Global health initiatives currently prioritize preventing premature death, a strategy that doesn't fully capture the impact of substance abuse on younger populations. This means current frameworks may undervalue the loss of healthy life years due to issues like alcohol and illicit drug use, which disproportionately affect younger individuals. The focus on premature mortality, while important, needs to be complemented by metrics that consider the age at which deaths occur and the long-term health impacts.

2

Why might current global health frameworks be overlooking critical health impacts?

The current global health frameworks may overlook critical aspects because they often measure success by focusing on premature mortality reductions. This approach can be misleading because it treats all premature deaths as equal, regardless of age. The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals 2030 and the World Health Organization's Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013-2020 are examples of initiatives that could be improved by considering the age-specific impact of various health issues, especially substance use.

3

How can we measure health improvements more comprehensively?

To better assess health improvements, summary health indicators like disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) or health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE) should be used, especially where data on disabling conditions is available. Where this isn't feasible, reducing years of life lost or improving life expectancies can provide useful insights. These measures help capture the full impact of health issues, including the loss of potential life years due to alcohol and illicit drug use among younger populations.

4

How does the impact of tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs on mortality vary across different age groups?

Substance use, specifically tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs, has varying effects across different age groups. Tobacco-related deaths often occur later in life, while alcohol and illicit drugs frequently lead to premature deaths. For instance, tobacco caused 3.7 million premature deaths, while alcohol and illicit drugs resulted in 2.0 million and 0.4 million respectively. The effects of tobacco are most prevalent among those aged 40-69, while alcohol and illicit drugs have a more significant impact on younger adults.

5

How should health priorities differ based on a country's income level and specific health challenges?

In lower- and middle-income countries, infant mortality is a pressing issue. In these regions, resources may be better allocated to address infant health, whereas in high-income countries, alcohol and illicit drug-related deaths at younger ages contribute to stagnant life expectancies and growing health inequalities. Tailoring interventions based on specific demographic and substance use patterns is crucial. For instance, where substance use during pregnancy is prevalent, integrating targeted health policies can yield significant benefits for infants.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.