Surreal illustration of a woman writing amidst blooming books.

Beyond Postfeminism: How Women's Autofiction Is Rewriting the Rules

"Exploring the rise of autofiction and its critique of postfeminist ideals in contemporary literature."


In contemporary discussions about feminism, much attention has been given to its reflection in media and broader culture. However, literature offers rich ground to extend existing debates within feminism. Contemporary women’s autofiction presents a unique literary response to the individualizing narratives of neoliberalism and postfeminism.

This article explores how authors like Sheila Heti (How Should A Person Be?) and Jenny Offill (Dept. of Speculation) are using autofiction to critically examine diminished feminist politics within a neoliberal, postfeminist society. Their work reflects the enduring marginality of female artistic identity, employing the confessional mode to emphasize the provisional nature of their being.

Autofiction, originally coined to describe autobiographical texts blending fact and fiction, has become a vital genre in North American and European literature. It navigates unstable boundaries between fiction, autobiography, and theory, offering a space for writers to reflect on the search for viable artistic consciousness. This approach is as important as the final product, especially when the definition of 'woman as artist' remains contested.

What Makes Autofiction a Powerful Tool for Feminist Critique?

Surreal illustration of a woman writing amidst blooming books.

Commentaries on postfeminism often focus on its presence in media and culture. This article highlights the potential of literature in extending existing debates within feminist studies. It argues that the rise of contemporary women's autofiction provides a literary response to the individualizing narrative of a neoliberal and postfeminist sensibility.

Sheila Heti’s How Should A Person Be? and Jenny Offill’s Dept. of Speculation use writing practices that are resolutely political. By employing the confessional mode, which has roots in the feminist movement, they reflect on the continuing marginality of female artistic identity. Both texts emphasize the inherently provisional nature of their existence.
  • Challenging Individualism: Critiques the neoliberal emphasis on self-improvement and ambition.
  • Highlighting Marginality: Focuses on the enduring challenges faced by female artists.
  • Promoting Feminist Solidarity: Establishes a social imaginary where feminist reawakening is nurtured.
  • Reclaiming Confession: Revalues the confessional mode as a means of feminist expression.
The texts highlight that the search for a viable artistic consciousness and experiments in artistic method are as crucial as the final product itself, particularly when the definition of a woman as an artist remains contested. The existence of these texts helps to create a wider social imaginary that encourages feminist organizing. Thus, the increasing popularity of contemporary women’s autofiction may offer strategies for remediating an otherwise diminished feminist politics in the present.

The Lasting Impact of Women's Autofiction

In conclusion, women's autofiction stands as a significant counterforce to neoliberal individualism, providing new practices of self-representation and underscoring the precariousness of women's artistic identity. By emphasizing the ongoing search for artistic consciousness, these works reclaim the political potential of feminist confession and foster a renewed sense of feminist solidarity in contemporary literature.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.