A person carefully balancing medications symbolizing the complexities of managing HIV and co-existing conditions.

Beyond HIV: Understanding and Improving Medication Adherence for Co-Existing Conditions

"New research reveals how HIV patients perceive their medications for other conditions differently than their HIV treatments, impacting adherence. What can be done?"


Thanks to advancements in treatment, people living with HIV are living longer, healthier lives. However, this also means managing other chronic health conditions that can arise with age, like heart disease, osteoporosis, and depression. This often requires taking multiple medications, creating a complex regimen that can be difficult to stick to.

A recent study explored how HIV-positive individuals perceive their medications for these co-existing conditions compared to their antiretroviral therapy (cART). The findings reveal significant differences in beliefs and adherence, highlighting areas where healthcare providers can improve patient support and education.

This article will break down the study's key findings and offer practical insights for both patients and healthcare professionals looking to optimize medication adherence and overall well-being in the context of HIV and co-existing conditions.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Comorbidity and Medication Burden

People living with HIV have greater comorbidity and comedication burdens than people without HIV, according to findings from a contemporary U.S. cohort covering 2020–2024. These burdens matter when selecting antiretroviral therapy (ART), since clinicians are advised to consider potential drug interactions and adverse events. A systematic review of HIV treatment regimens also notes that real-world studies often find poor long-term adherence, while adherence may be higher in randomized controlled trials because of participant selection and other trial conditions.

The HIV Care Continuum

NIH describes HIV treatment adherence as part of a continuum that includes linkage to care after testing, starting ART, staying engaged in appointments, and taking treatment as prescribed. The guidance recommends a multidisciplinary approach involving, as available, nursing, pharmacy, social work, and case management to identify and address barriers to medication and appointment adherence. Linkage can be affected by insufficient socioeconomic resources, and the NIH emphasizes that these efforts should be delivered with compassion and persistence. A 2023 paper also identifies adherence barriers as an ongoing challenge and examines them from the perspectives of people living with HIV and health and social-service professionals.

Adherence Across HIV Treatment’s Evolution

A 2018 Nature milestone timeline charts HIV research from the epidemic’s origins through developments in treatment, vaccines, and insights into HIV/AIDS. More recent treatment advances have expanded adherence options: a review describes cabotegravir and rilpivirine injections given every two months and lenacapavir given every six months as showing promising efficacy for a subset of patients, including use outside approved indications. U.S. research on medication adherence has also reported that the quality of routine adherence care at clinical sites significantly affects medication-taking behavior, and that increased attention to adherence may help explain improvements in treatment implementation.

The Belief Gap: How Patients See HIV Meds vs. Other Treatments

A person carefully balancing medications symbolizing the complexities of managing HIV and co-existing conditions.

The study, published in HIV Medicine, involved 105 HIV-positive patients in Switzerland who were also taking medication for other chronic conditions. Researchers used questionnaires to assess patients' beliefs about their HIV medications (cART) and their other medications (co-treatments).

The results revealed a significant "belief gap" between the two types of medications:

  • Necessity: Patients felt their HIV medications were more necessary for their health than their co-treatments. The standardized mean responses for the BMQ Specific-Necessity subscores were 4.46 [standard deviation (SD): 0.58] and 2.86 (SD: 1.02) for cART and co-treatments, respectively (P < 0.0001).
  • Concerns: Patients had greater concerns about potential side effects and negative consequences associated with their co-treatments compared to their HIV medications. For Specific-Concerns, the standardized mean responses were 2.9 (SD: 1.02) for CART and 4.09 (SD: 1.02) (P < 0.0001) for co-treatments.
  • Adherence: A higher percentage of patients reported being adherent to their HIV medications compared to their co-treatments. Eighty-seven patients (83%) were adherent to cART and 75 (71%) were adherent to their co-treatments (P = 0.0001).
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Medication Review in Aging With HIV

A review on polypharmacy, drug–drug interactions, and inappropriate drugs in the aging population with HIV describes a medication-reporting process used in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS). Participants were contacted by post one week before their twice-yearly SHCS appointment and invited to list all current medications, their dosages, and the date and time of their last dose on a dedicated form. They were asked to bring the completed form to their routine visit, creating a structured opportunity to document medication use.

Limits of Self-Reported Co-Treatment Adherence

A study of people living with HIV compared beliefs about chronic co-treatments with beliefs about combined antiretroviral therapy. Because participants could have several co-treatments, the researchers said it was not feasible to ask them to complete a separate questionnaire for every medication; instead, they assessed self-reported adherence to the co-treatment with the worst adherence. The study’s authors call for research with a larger sample and more objective adherence measures to explore the relationship between adherence and patients’ perceptions.

Regimen Complexity and Adherence Strategies

A 2019 systematic review examined whether single-tablet regimens (STRs), compared with multiple-tablet regimens (MTRs), are related to adherence and viral suppression; its source summary notes that suboptimal adherence is associated with regimen complexity and high tablet burden. A separate review of U.S. studies published between 2017 and 2020 examined adherence and pill burden, resistance burden, and comorbidities among people living with HIV. More recently, a 2026 report says scalable interventions—particularly reminders, counselling, and supporter-based approaches—improved adherence, while recommending that interventions be tailored to population needs.

These findings suggest that patients may prioritize their HIV treatment due to a stronger understanding of its importance for survival, while viewing medications for other conditions as less critical or potentially more burdensome.

Bridging the Gap: Improving Adherence for All Medications

The study highlights the need for healthcare providers to address the "belief gap" and provide better support for patients managing multiple medications. Here are some potential strategies:

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Personalized and Long-Acting Treatment

A report on findings presented at AIDS 2026 says two-drug HIV regimens and long-acting injectable therapies offer effective treatment options and may support more individualized care. It highlights shared decision-making, adherence, quality of life, and reducing long-term medication exposure alongside viral suppression. The NIH strategic plan notes that more than half of people living with HIV in the United States are over age 50 and face challenges related to HIV’s long-term effects and its treatment across organ systems. Research on oral ART adherence interventions also points to adherence counselling beyond ART education as an effective approach.

Persistent Barriers in HIV Care

A review of HIV treatment and care identifies medication adherence, drug resistance, and access to healthcare as persistent challenges that hinder efforts to control the epidemic. An interview summary on long-acting ART describes these therapies as a potential way to address ongoing management challenges, with possible benefits including improved adherence, quality of life, and reduced impact of stigma. The summary frames long-acting treatment as an evolving part of HIV care rather than a resolution of all barriers.

<ul> <li>Education: Clearly explain the importance of all prescribed medications, not just HIV treatments. Address patient concerns about side effects and potential interactions.</li> <li>Communication: Encourage open communication between patients and providers about adherence challenges and any difficulties experienced with co-treatments.</li> <li>Individualized Approach: Tailor medication regimens and support strategies to meet the specific needs and beliefs of each patient.</li> <li>Simplify Regimens: Explore opportunities to simplify medication schedules and reduce the overall pill burden whenever possible.</li> </ul>

By understanding and addressing the factors that influence patient beliefs about their medications, healthcare providers can help improve adherence, optimize treatment outcomes, and enhance the overall quality of life for people living with HIV and other chronic conditions.

Adherence reports depend on which co-treatment was considered

  • 71.4%When asked about the co-treatment they were most likely to miss, 71.4% reported missing one dose or none. This measure focuses on the medication patients identified as most vulnerable to missed doses, rather than all co-treatments collectively.[1]

Beliefs differed, but the study did not link them to adherence

The questionnaire results show that participants viewed cART as more necessary and had greater concerns about co-treatments. These are differences in reported beliefs, not evidence that those beliefs caused the adherence difference described in the article.[1] [2]

The study's adherence definition counted missing no more than one dose in the previous four weeks as adherent. That threshold describes a recent self-report, not a direct measure of medication-taking over time.[2]

Limits built into the adherence evidence

  • For people taking several co-treatments, the questionnaire captured the co-treatment with the worst reported adherence, not a separate assessment of each medicine.[1]
  • The authors pointed to pharmacy refill records and electronic monitoring as more objective ways to assess adherence in future analyses.[1]

Comparing beliefs about HIV therapy and chronic co-treatments

PopulationHIV-infected patients receiving cART and chronic co-treatments[2]
Sample size105 patients included in the analysis[2]
SettingInfectious Disease Service at the University Hospital in Lausanne, Switzerland[2]
DurationJuly 2015 to January 2016[2]
ComparisoncART compared with co-treatments[2]
p-valueP = 0.0001[2]
Times cited21[2]

How this comparison fits later HIV medication research

A review spanning multiple studies found small but clinically meaningful relationships between patients' necessity and concerns beliefs and HIV medication adherence. That broader pattern does not establish that the belief differences in this individual study tracked with adherence; its authors reported no such association.[1] [3]

What follow-up work would need to establish

  • Would adherence patterns differ if measured through pharmacy refill records or electronic monitoring rather than patient report?[1]
  • Would assessing each co-treatment separately change the picture captured by asking about the medicine patients were most likely to miss?[1]

Terms used in the study

Necessity
A belief domain about perceived medication need.[2]
Concerns
A belief domain about possible adverse consequences.[2]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1111/hiv.12542, Alternate LINK

Title: Hiv-Infected Patients' Beliefs About Their Chronic Co-Treatments In Comparison With Their Combined Antiretroviral Therapy

Subject: Pharmacology (medical)

Journal: HIV Medicine

Publisher: Wiley

Authors: S Kamal, O Bugnon, M Cavassini, Mp Schneider

Published: 2017-08-16

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the "belief gap" mentioned in the findings?

The "belief gap" refers to the differing perceptions patients have regarding their medications. The study found that individuals living with HIV often view their cART as more crucial for their health than their co-treatments. This is reflected in higher necessity beliefs and lower concern about side effects for cART. It suggests that patients may prioritize their HIV medications due to a clearer understanding of their life-saving importance, while viewing other medications as potentially less critical or more troublesome.

2

Why is managing multiple medications challenging for those with HIV?

Managing multiple medications, including cART and those for co-existing conditions, is a complex task. Due to advancements in treatment, individuals living with HIV are living longer, leading to age-related health conditions like heart disease or depression. Taking multiple medications for these various conditions creates a complex regimen. Adherence to these medications is crucial for managing both HIV and the co-existing conditions effectively, contributing to improved overall well-being. A recent study found that individuals have different beliefs regarding their cART and co-treatments, impacting their adherence.

3

What does "adherence" mean in relation to the study?

Adherence in the context of this study refers to the extent to which patients follow their prescribed medication schedules. The study showed that patients were more adherent to their cART than to their co-treatments. This suggests a potential disparity in how patients prioritize their medications, with a tendency to adhere more closely to treatments they perceive as more critical, such as those for HIV. Understanding and addressing this gap is vital for improving overall health outcomes.

4

What is cART and how does it relate to the study?

cART, or antiretroviral therapy, is the medication used to treat HIV. The study compared patients' beliefs and adherence to cART with their perceptions and adherence to medications for other health conditions. This comparison revealed a 'belief gap,' where patients perceived cART as more necessary and associated with fewer concerns compared to other medications. This difference in perception directly impacted adherence rates, emphasizing the importance of focusing on patient beliefs.

5

How can healthcare providers improve medication adherence based on the study's findings?

The study's findings underscore the need for healthcare providers to address the "belief gap." Strategies include enhancing patient education about co-treatments, and addressing concerns about side effects. By providing clear information about the benefits of all medications and actively engaging with patients, healthcare professionals can improve medication adherence and overall health outcomes for people living with HIV. This involves tailoring support to individual patient needs and fostering open communication to address any misconceptions or concerns about medication regimens.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.