Earth with cracked GDP symbol and growing plants

Beyond GDP: Why We Need New Ways to Measure Progress and Well-being

Soraya Malik in Business & Economy June 2025 • 4 min read.

"Rethinking societal advancement in the 21st century: Moving beyond economic indicators to embrace sustainability and happiness."

In today's world, it's common to hear leaders and experts talk about the importance of 'sustainable development.' But what does that really mean, and how do we know if we're actually achieving it? For many years, progress has been measured almost entirely by economic growth, using figures like Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

However, relying only on GDP to measure how well a country is doing has been questioned for a long time. This is because GDP doesn't take into account important things like people's happiness, their well-being, or the health of the environment. Focusing solely on economic indicators can give us a distorted view of progress.

This article will explore why we need to look beyond GDP. We'll examine alternative ways to measure progress that consider quality of life, environmental sustainability, and economic development together. By adopting a more comprehensive approach, we can better understand how societies are truly progressing and work towards a more sustainable future.

The Problem with GDP: Why Economic Growth Isn't Everything

Earth with cracked GDP symbol and growing plants

GDP, or Gross Domestic Product, measures the total value of goods and services produced in a country during a specific period. While it's a widely used indicator, it has significant limitations when it comes to assessing societal well-being and sustainable progress.

Here's why relying solely on GDP can be misleading:

Ignores social well-being: GDP doesn't reflect factors like happiness, health, education, social connections, and overall quality of life.
Disregards environmental impact: GDP treats resource depletion and pollution as economic gains, failing to account for the long-term environmental consequences of economic activities.
Hides inequality: GDP doesn't reveal how wealth is distributed within a society. A high GDP can mask significant income disparities and social inequalities.
Treats all economic activity as positive: GDP counts both beneficial and harmful activities (like cleaning up pollution or repairing damages from accidents) as positive contributions.

As Robert Kennedy eloquently stated in 1968, GDP measures 'everything... except that which makes life worthwhile.' Focusing solely on GDP can lead to policies that prioritize economic growth at the expense of social and environmental well-being.

A Call for Change: Embracing a More Holistic View of Progress

It's time to move beyond GDP and adopt a more comprehensive approach to measuring progress. By incorporating indicators of social well-being, environmental sustainability, and economic development, we can gain a more accurate understanding of how societies are truly progressing. This shift in perspective is essential for creating policies that promote a more sustainable, equitable, and fulfilling future for all.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What is Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and why is it considered an inadequate measure of societal progress?

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the total value of goods and services produced in a country over a specific period. While widely used, it fails to capture crucial aspects of societal well-being and sustainable progress. GDP overlooks social well-being factors like happiness, health, education, and social connections. It disregards environmental impacts by treating resource depletion and pollution as economic gains. GDP also hides income disparities and considers all economic activity as positive, regardless of its impact on society or the environment. This limited scope can lead to policies that prioritize economic growth at the expense of social and environmental health.

How does focusing solely on GDP potentially lead to a distorted view of a nation's progress?

Relying exclusively on GDP presents a distorted view because it excludes critical elements of a thriving society. It neglects the quality of life, including happiness and overall well-being, and ignores the environmental consequences of economic activities. High GDP figures can mask significant income inequalities and fail to reflect the distribution of wealth within a society. Furthermore, GDP doesn't differentiate between beneficial and harmful economic activities; it counts both positive and negative contributions similarly. This skewed perspective can result in policies that prioritize economic expansion without considering the long-term effects on social well-being and environmental sustainability.

What are the key limitations of using GDP as the primary indicator of a country's advancement?

The primary limitations of GDP stem from its narrow focus on economic output, neglecting critical aspects of a nation's well-being. GDP ignores social well-being indicators such as happiness, health, and educational attainment, offering an incomplete picture of societal health. It disregards environmental impacts, treating pollution and resource depletion as positive economic contributions. GDP also fails to account for income inequality, masking disparities in wealth distribution. Moreover, GDP treats both beneficial and detrimental economic activities as positive, lacking the nuance to assess the long-term sustainability of economic practices. These limitations render GDP inadequate for assessing true societal progress.

Why is it important to move beyond GDP and what alternative approaches are suggested for measuring progress?

It is crucial to move beyond GDP to embrace a more holistic view of progress because GDP's limitations lead to incomplete assessments of societal well-being and sustainable development. To gain a more accurate understanding, alternative approaches should incorporate indicators of social well-being, environmental sustainability, and economic development together. This comprehensive approach allows for the creation of policies that promote a more sustainable, equitable, and fulfilling future for all. Examples of these indicators include measures of happiness, environmental quality, and equitable distribution of wealth.

How does GDP treat environmental impact, and what are the implications of this approach?

GDP disregards environmental impacts by treating resource depletion and pollution as economic gains. This means that activities that harm the environment, such as deforestation or pollution cleanup, are recorded as positive contributions to GDP. This approach fails to account for the long-term environmental consequences of economic activities, such as climate change, loss of biodiversity, and depletion of natural resources. The implications of this are that it can lead to unsustainable practices, where economic growth is prioritized over environmental protection, potentially jeopardizing the planet's health and the well-being of future generations.