Woman exercising to manage diabetes

Beat Diabetes with Exercise: How Resistance and Endurance Training Can Help

"Discover the surprising benefits of resistance and endurance training for women managing Type 2 Diabetes, including improved insulin sensitivity and body composition."


Type 2 diabetes is characterized by high blood sugar levels, insulin resistance, and a relative insulin deficiency. Insulin resistance, where the body's cells don't respond effectively to insulin, is a major factor in the development of type 2 diabetes and its long-term complications.

Adipose tissue, or body fat, isn't just a storage depot for energy; it's an active endocrine organ, producing various cytokines known as adipokines. Nesfatin-1, one of these adipokines, plays a vital role in regulating appetite, energy balance, and metabolism.

Emerging research suggests that physical activity can be a powerful tool in managing insulin resistance and improving overall health for individuals with diabetes. While factors like physical exercise affect the secretion of adipokines and heat shock proteins (HSPs), the specific impacts of exercise on nesfatin-1 and HSP70 are still being explored. This article delves into a study investigating the effects of resistance and endurance training on these key markers in women with type 2 diabetes.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Resistance Training and Diabetes Risk

Type 2 diabetes mellitus accounts for approximately 90% of diabetes cases globally. Regular physical activity is regarded as a key component of type 2 diabetes management, while research is increasingly examining resistance training's independent effects on glycemic control. Current guidelines recommend resistance training to help prevent diabetes, although questions remain about the best amount, frequency, and relationship to aerobic exercise and sedentary time.

How Do Resistance and Endurance Training Impact Key Health Markers in Women with Type 2 Diabetes?

Woman exercising to manage diabetes

A recent study investigated the effects of resistance and endurance training on women with type 2 diabetes. The study involved 26 women with type 2 diabetes, divided into three groups: a resistance training group, an endurance training group, and a control group. The training groups participated in a 10-week exercise program, while the control group maintained their usual sedentary lifestyle.

Here’s a breakdown of the training protocols:

  • Resistance Training: Participants engaged in three sessions per week, utilizing eight different fitness machines and free weights. The intensity gradually increased from 30-50% of one repetition maximum (1RM) to 70-80% of 1RM in the final sessions. Each workout included a warm-up, 40 minutes of resistance training, and a cool-down.
  • Endurance Training: Participants exercised three times per week on a cycle ergometer. The intensity started at 40-50% of maximum heart rate (HR max) for 20-25 minutes, progressing to 70-80% of HR max for 40-45 minutes. Each session included warm-up, cycling, and cool-down.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

What Recent Reviews Examine

A systematic review and meta-analysis examined how different resistance-training intensities affect people with type 2 diabetes. Its outcomes included glycemia, lipids, blood pressure, physical adaptations, and body measurements. Other cited research reports that resistance training can reduce body mass, body-mass index, percentage body fat, and waist-to-hip ratio.

Comparing Exercise Modalities

Research has compared aerobic, resistance, and combined exercise training using the same endpoints, with no exercise serving as the reference for indirect comparisons. A separate systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates aerobic exercise versus resistance training for cardiometabolic outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes and concurrent obesity. Direct comparisons between combined aerobic-resistance training and high-intensity interval training remain limited across clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

The study revealed some intriguing results. The resistance training group experienced a significant increase in nesfatin-1 levels and a significant decrease in HSP70 levels. Both training groups saw significant decreases in glucose levels, insulin resistance (HOMA1-IR), and body composition indices (except for waist-to-hip ratio). However, insulin levels didn't significantly change in either training group.

The Takeaway: Exercise as a Complementary Therapy for Diabetes

The study's findings suggest that both resistance and endurance training can be valuable tools in managing type 2 diabetes in women. Resistance training appears to have a unique impact on nesfatin-1 and HSP70 levels, while both forms of exercise contribute to improved glucose control, insulin resistance, and body composition. Incorporating these exercise modalities, alongside diet and medical interventions, may empower individuals to take control of their health and well-being.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Interpreting the Evidence

An umbrella review describes resistance training as recommended for type 2 diabetes while noting that the existing secondary evidence is voluminous and heterogeneous. The review maps, appraises, and grades the certainty of resistance training's effects on glycemic and cardiometabolic outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes. This emphasis on evidence certainty is important when interpreting findings across differing reviews and study designs.

Exercise Within Diabetes Care

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is rapidly increasing, creating an urgent need for effective prevention and management strategies. Resistance training may promote health benefits through increases in skeletal muscle mass and qualitative changes in skeletal muscle. Structured aerobic or resistance training alone also appears beneficial for glucose homeostasis, chronic systemic inflammation, resting cardiovascular function, and mental health in people with obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Training That Fits Real Life

Progressively increasing the duration and intensity of aerobic exercise can lead to further improvements in A1c. The Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study compared glucose control in 300 participants with type 2 diabetes who completed a twice-weekly mixed aerobic and resistance-training program. The program included either low- or high-intensity training, highlighting how both training frequency and intensity can be examined in real-world diabetes care.

What the exercise evidence means for insulin resistance

Across the cited exercise reports, insulin resistance improved in some settings, but not in every group or comparison. That variation means the reported benefit should not be treated as a universal response to resistance training.[1] [2]

A proposed explanation links improved insulin sensitivity to changes in abdominal fat and muscle density, while another account points to muscle-contraction signaling rather than changes in muscle mass or body composition. These are explanations offered in the cited sources, not proof that either mechanism caused the changes.[2] [3]

How related reports frame the exercise findings

A resistance-training review set out to compare training intensities across glycemia, lipids, blood pressure, physical adaptations, and body measurements; its evidence base comprised randomized trials. This frames intensity as a comparison question rather than establishing that one intensity is best.[4]

A later paper described the earlier women-with-diabetes finding as an increase in nesfatin-1 after resistance training, and also noted a separate report of increases after endurance and strength training in overweight and obese women. Those citations place the biomarker result alongside another population and training combination, not as a direct replication.[5]

The exercise-and-vitamin evidence reports that low-intensity exercise performed regularly improved insulin resistance and related measures, while its combined-exercise interventions did not significantly change insulin levels. These results make clear that outcome patterns can differ across measures and intervention designs.[1]

Questions the exercise comparisons leave open

  • Do improvements in insulin resistance occur consistently across resistance-training groups, given that one cited program found no significant change in either its training or control group?[2]
  • Can exercise-related shifts in nesfatin-1 be linked to changes in glucose regulation, or do the cited reports establish only that these measures change together in some settings?[5] [6]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1016/j.scispo.2018.04.010, Alternate LINK

Title: The Effects Of Resistance And Endurance Training On Levels Of Nesfatin-1, Hsp70, Insulin Resistance And Body Composition In Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Subject: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Journal: Science & Sports

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Authors: M. Mogharnasi, A. Tajitabas, M. Tashakorizadeh, S.H. Nayebifar

Published: 2019-02-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is insulin resistance and how did the exercises affect it?

Insulin resistance occurs when the body's cells don't respond effectively to insulin, leading to high blood sugar levels. This is a major factor in the development of Type 2 Diabetes and its complications. In the study, both Resistance Training and Endurance Training showed significant decreases in insulin resistance (HOMA1-IR), indicating that these exercises can help the body better utilize insulin and manage blood sugar.

2

What is Nesfatin-1 and why is it relevant?

Nesfatin-1 is an adipokine, a substance produced by adipose tissue (body fat), that plays a role in regulating appetite, energy balance, and metabolism. The study found that Resistance Training led to a significant increase in nesfatin-1 levels. While the exact implications are still being researched, this suggests that Resistance Training may have a positive impact on metabolic health by influencing this key adipokine.

3

What is HSP70 and how did the exercises impact it?

HSP70, or Heat Shock Protein 70, is a protein that cells produce in response to stress. The study found that Resistance Training led to a significant decrease in HSP70 levels. The implications of this decrease are still being explored, but it suggests that Resistance Training may have a different impact on cellular stress responses compared to Endurance Training.

4

What were the specific exercise programs used in the study?

The study involved two main types of exercise: Resistance Training and Endurance Training. Resistance Training used weights and machines to build muscle strength, while Endurance Training used a cycle ergometer to improve cardiovascular fitness. The Resistance Training group engaged in three sessions per week using fitness machines and free weights, with increasing intensity. The Endurance Training group also exercised three times per week on a cycle ergometer with increasing intensity and duration. Both types of training were shown to improve various health markers in women with Type 2 Diabetes.

5

What are the key takeaways from the study regarding exercise and diabetes?

The study's findings highlight the benefits of both Resistance Training and Endurance Training for managing Type 2 Diabetes in women. Both types of exercise led to improvements in glucose control, insulin resistance, and body composition. Resistance Training specifically impacted nesfatin-1 and HSP70 levels. These results suggest that incorporating these exercises, along with diet and medical interventions, can be a valuable approach for individuals to improve their health and well-being.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.