Surreal cityscape with a giant salary check overshadowing shareholders.

Are CEOs Overpaid? Unpacking Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation

Author's portrait.
Kai Mendoza in Business & Economy April 2025 • 4 min read.

"A deep dive into how ownership, board structure, and governance policies impact CEO pay in companies around the world."


Executive compensation has always been a hot topic, sparking debates about fairness, economic disparities, and whether top executives truly earn their hefty paychecks. In today's world, where income inequality is increasingly scrutinized, understanding how CEO compensation is determined is more critical than ever.

The process of setting CEO compensation is complex, involving numerous stakeholders and influenced by a variety of factors. Boards of directors, compensation committees, and shareholders all play a role, but the ultimate outcome can be affected by everything from company performance to the structure of corporate ownership.

While standard governance models often aim to align executive interests with those of shareholders, they may not always be effective, especially in companies with dominant owners. This article delves into the multifaceted world of CEO compensation, corporate governance, and ownership structures, offering insights into the dynamics that shape executive pay.

The Forces Behind CEO Compensation

Surreal cityscape with a giant salary check overshadowing shareholders.

Several key elements come into play when determining CEO compensation. Traditional governance structures emphasize the importance of board composition, the presence of independent directors, and the establishment of compensation committees. These mechanisms are designed to ensure that CEO pay is aligned with company performance and shareholder interests.

However, the effectiveness of these structures can vary significantly depending on the ownership model of the company. In companies with dispersed ownership, where no single entity controls a large percentage of shares, boards and compensation committees tend to have more influence. In contrast, companies with concentrated ownership often see dominant shareholders wielding considerable power, potentially overshadowing the role of independent oversight.
  • Board Composition: The balance of independent versus inside directors affects oversight.
  • Compensation Committees: These committees are meant to bring objectivity to evaluation.
  • Ownership Structure: Concentrated versus dispersed ownership changes the power dynamics.
  • Governance Policies: Formal guidelines aim to align CEO incentives with shareholder value.
Emerging research suggests that uniform governance structures may not be equally effective across different ownership categories. For instance, in family-owned businesses, the identity and influence of the dominant family members can significantly impact CEO compensation decisions, sometimes leading to outcomes that deviate from standard governance principles.

Toward Fairer Executive Compensation

As debates surrounding CEO compensation continue, it's clear that a nuanced understanding of corporate governance, ownership structures, and ethical considerations is essential. By promoting transparency, empowering minority shareholders, and fostering independent oversight, we can strive for fairer and more equitable executive compensation practices that benefit all stakeholders.

Related Articles

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.