Stethoscope shield against bacteria for antibiotic stewardship

Antibiotic Stewardship: Are We Training Future Leaders?

"Infectious disease fellowships may be missing the mark in preparing physicians to champion antibiotic stewardship, according to new research. Is a pharmacy-led approach the answer?"


The rise of antibiotic-resistant infections poses a significant threat to global public health, making the appropriate use of antibiotics more critical than ever. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) are designed to optimize antibiotic use, yet their success hinges on having well-trained leaders. In many hospitals, particularly academic centers, infectious disease (ID) fellows play a key role in these programs.

However, are these ID fellowships adequately preparing future physicians to be champions of antibiotic stewardship? A qualitative study published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases sheds light on this question, exploring the experiences and perspectives of ID fellows regarding their stewardship training and their perceived role as future stewards.

The study's findings reveal a potential disconnect: ID fellows often focus on the practical tasks of stewardship, such as approving antibiotic prescriptions, without fully grasping the broader public health implications or seeing themselves as leaders in this area. This raises concerns about the future of antibiotic stewardship and the need for improvements in fellowship training.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Tracking Antibiotic Use and Stewardship

CDC’s “Antibiotic Use and Stewardship in the United States, 2025” report, published February 9, 2026, presents surveillance data on antibiotic use alongside guidance and examples of collaboration. CDC describes stewardship as ensuring antibiotics are prescribed and used when they provide a clear health benefit, and identifies improving antibiotic use as a strategy to optimize patient safety and combat antimicrobial resistance in the United States. The 2024 report notes that regional and national comparisons of antibiotic use, considered alongside resistance and healthcare-associated infection data, can help inform, implement, and assess stewardship interventions.

Building Stewardship Skills in Fellowship

The IDSA Core Antimicrobial Stewardship (CAS) Curriculum provides infectious diseases fellows with foundational stewardship education, regardless of their eventual career plans. IDSA also distinguishes this core curriculum from an Advanced Curriculum intended to develop the knowledge and skills needed for stewardship leadership. The CAS curriculum was designed for use within existing ID fellowship programs, following a needs assessment of training program directors. IDSA’s listed core skills include explaining the rationale for stewardship, performing program interventions and activities, and measuring program processes and outcomes.

From Resistance Recognition to Modern Stewardship

A 2025 account in The Hospitalist traces antibiotic stewardship from early recognition of resistance in the 1940s to modern regulatory mandates and program implementation. A 2021 chapter describes the stakes: infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, longer hospital stays, and substantial cost burdens. It characterizes stewardship as increasingly important for optimizing antimicrobial use. ACGME’s Infectious Disease Milestones provide a framework for assessing fellows’ development in key dimensions of physician competency within accredited training programs.

The Fellow's Perspective: Tasks vs. Public Health

Stethoscope shield against bacteria for antibiotic stewardship

The study, which involved in-depth interviews with 17 ID fellows from across the United States, uncovered several key themes. One prominent theme was that fellows primarily associated antibiotic stewardship with concrete tasks, such as processing antibiotic approvals and interacting with other healthcare professionals. While these activities are important, the fellows often lacked a broader perspective on the public health relevance of their work.

Several fellows expressed frustration with the burden of carrying the antibiotic approval pager, highlighting the reactive nature of this task. In contrast, they found more satisfaction in formal patient consultations, where they could engage in collaborative discussions and educate other providers about appropriate antibiotic use.

  • Focus on Tasks: Stewardship primarily seen as approvals, education, and interactions.
  • Limited Public Health View: Little focus on the broader impact of antibiotic resistance.
  • Pharmacist Reliance: Fellows often turned to pharmacists as primary resources for antibiotic knowledge.
  • Leadership Gap: Few fellows envisioned themselves as future leaders of stewardship programs.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Leadership, Training, and Practical Skills

A depth review of hospital administration and stewardship reports that CDC guidance assigns accountability for antibiotic stewardship programs to a physician leader with a pharmacist co-lead, recognizing pharmacists’ central role. A qualitative study of physician and pharmacist stewards notes that its finding is consistent with prior research in which ID fellows viewed pharmacists as program leads. Separately, a study on implementing the IDSA core curriculum says its findings matter because ID fellows have had limited exposure to formal stewardship curricular material. A December 2025 quasi-experimental pre-post course study targeted physicians and pharmacists with practical prescribing instruction and used a validated 25-item questionnaire for self-assessments of confidence and knowledge.

A Leadership Gap in Fellowship Training

A qualitative study of infectious diseases fellows found that the physician’s role in antibiotic stewardship was not being communicated effectively and that fellows were not being educated to become program leaders. The study’s conclusions also say fellowship training was not successfully conveying stewardship’s public health importance or the role of ID physicians as program leaders. Several fellows suggested that stewardship programs should instead be led by pharmacists. Fellows were described as focusing more on concrete stewardship tasks.

Dedicated ID Pharmacist and Program Adherence

A comparison of two antimicrobial stewardship programs found a strong association between having a dedicated infectious diseases pharmacist and higher adherence to recommended stewardship strategies. The comparison was with a similar program at a similar hospital that relied on a geographic model of clinical pharmacists. A second listing of the study describes the dedicated-pharmacist program as having greater adherence to recommended antimicrobial therapy practices than the program relying on ward pharmacists.

A particularly noteworthy finding was the significant reliance on pharmacists as primary sources of antibiotic expertise. Many fellows viewed pharmacists as invaluable resources for answering complex questions about antibiotic selection, dosing, and duration. In some cases, fellows even suggested that pharmacists could take on a larger role in stewardship, potentially diminishing the perceived need for physician leadership. This raises questions about how ID fellowship programs are framing the role of physicians in antibiotic stewardship and whether they are adequately emphasizing the unique contributions that ID physicians can make.

Re-evaluating ID Fellowship Training: A Call to Action

The study's findings suggest that ID fellowship programs need to re-evaluate their approach to antibiotic stewardship training. While fellows gain valuable experience in the practical aspects of stewardship, they may be missing the bigger picture: the critical role they can play in combating antibiotic resistance and protecting public health.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Mentorship and Applied Stewardship Experience

The University of Chicago ID fellowship describes faculty experts in antimicrobial stewardship and medical education as mentors who help shape fellows’ careers in clinical medicine and research. Henry Ford’s infectious diseases pharmacy fellowship says trainees gain experience developing research questions, designing protocols, managing and analyzing quantitative data, and publishing findings. These program descriptions illustrate training pathways that combine mentorship with research and practical skills relevant to stewardship work.

Preparing Future Stewardship Leaders

The article “Antibiotic Stewardship: Are We Training Future Leaders?” reports a gap in ID fellowship programs’ emphasis on stewardship leadership. Its summary says fellows may view stewardship as a series of tasks rather than a public health imperative, potentially limiting their future ability to lead effective programs. A separate 2026 article shares incoming infectious diseases pharmacy residents’ reasons for choosing the field, including interest in antimicrobial stewardship and patient care, and highlights mentorship and openness to opportunities in advice for future trainees.

Stewardship as a System-Wide Effort

A 2023 review describes antimicrobial resistance as a “silent pandemic” and defines antimicrobial stewardship as coordinated actions promoting responsible antimicrobial use. It emphasizes judicious prescribing by clinicians and careful compliance by patients. A Mass General Brigham fellowship track describes infection control, healthcare epidemiology, and antibiotic stewardship as critical to safe and effective patient care. The track’s stated purpose is to prepare fellows for careers in these areas, with an emphasis on competencies needed for leadership roles.

How Fellows Experience Stewardship

A qualitative study explored infectious diseases fellows’ experiences and perspectives on antibiotic stewardship. Its background describes antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections as a major public health threat and notes that improper antibiotic use remains high. The study was motivated by the limited research on how fellows view stewardship activities, despite fellows’ role in stewardship efforts. Its focus on fellows’ perspectives brings trainees’ experiences into discussions of how stewardship leadership is taught.

To address this gap, the authors recommend several key changes: <ul><li><b>Enhance Curriculum:</b> Develop robust curricula that emphasize the public health importance of antibiotic stewardship and the leadership role of ID physicians.</li><li><b>Promote Engagement:</b> Actively involve fellows in all aspects of stewardship programs, including decision-making processes and committee meetings.</li><li><b>Foster Collaboration:</b> Encourage collaboration between fellows, ID physicians, and pharmacists, recognizing the unique expertise that each brings to the table.</li></ul>

Ultimately, by strengthening antibiotic stewardship training in ID fellowship programs, we can better prepare future physicians to be effective leaders in the fight against antibiotic resistance, safeguarding public health for generations to come. Further research is warranted and needed to determine which factors have majorly led to lack of education regarding the antibiotic stewardship.

What fellows' preferences suggest about stewardship work

Some fellows favored consults they described as intellectually demanding over routine antibiotic management. This indicates that their experience of stewardship could depend on the kind of clinical work involved, rather than reflecting a single view of the role.[1]

The study describes fellows’ views and training experiences; it does not establish whether those views translate into later leadership or program performance.[1] [2]

What limits the interview findings

  • Recruitment relied on program directors forwarding study information, and the researchers could not determine how many did so.[2]
Study at a glance
Sample size17[2]
SettingAcross the United States[2]
Main outcomeFellows' experiences and perspectives regarding antibiotic stewardship training and their role as future antibiotic stewards[2]
Times cited10[2]

What future evaluations could clarify

  • Do fellows’ preferences for intellectually demanding consults correspond to how they understand stewardship responsibilities?[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1093/ofid/ofy102, Alternate LINK

Title: A Qualitative Study Of The Real-World Experiences Of Infectious Diseases Fellows Regarding Antibiotic Stewardship

Subject: Infectious Diseases

Journal: Open Forum Infectious Diseases

Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)

Authors: Jake R Morgan, Tamar F Barlam, Mari-Lynn Drainoni

Published: 2018-05-03

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the main purpose of antibiotic stewardship programs, and why are they important?

Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) are designed to optimize antibiotic use. These programs are crucial because the rise of antibiotic-resistant infections poses a significant threat to global public health. Successful ASPs require well-trained leaders, often infectious disease (ID) fellows in hospitals, particularly academic centers. The importance lies in combating antibiotic resistance and ensuring effective treatment of infections.

2

What was the focus of the study on infectious disease fellows?

The main focus of the study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of infectious disease (ID) fellows regarding their antibiotic stewardship training and their perceived role as future stewards. The study involved in-depth interviews with 17 ID fellows from across the United States. The aim was to understand how ID fellowships prepare physicians for leadership roles in antibiotic stewardship.

3

What is the potential disconnect in how infectious disease fellows view antibiotic stewardship?

ID fellows often concentrate on practical tasks like approving antibiotic prescriptions. They may not fully grasp the broader public health implications or see themselves as leaders in this area. This may lead to a disconnect between the tasks and the overall goals of antibiotic stewardship, potentially hindering their ability to lead effective programs in the future and contribute to the fight against antibiotic resistance.

4

How do infectious disease fellows typically view pharmacists in the context of antibiotic stewardship?

Pharmacists are often seen as primary sources of antibiotic expertise by infectious disease (ID) fellows. Fellows frequently rely on pharmacists for information regarding antibiotic selection, dosing, and duration. This reliance can potentially diminish the perceived need for physician leadership in antibiotic stewardship, which raises questions about how ID fellowship programs are framing the role of physicians in stewardship.

5

What does the study suggest about the current training of infectious disease fellows in antibiotic stewardship?

Infectious disease (ID) fellowship programs may need to re-evaluate their approach to antibiotic stewardship training. While fellows gain experience in practical aspects of stewardship, they might be missing the bigger picture. The study's findings suggest the need to emphasize the critical role ID physicians can play in combating antibiotic resistance and protecting public health. The aim is to improve the training to ensure future leaders are well-prepared for antibiotic stewardship.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.