Distorted financial statement reflecting information asymmetry.

Accounting Under Scrutiny: How Hidden Asymmetries Impact Your Financial Reality

Rhea Morgan in Business & Economy August 2025 • 4 min read.

"Uncover the truth behind measurement quality and its impact on business decisions and fair value assessments. Is hidden data skewing the financial landscape?"

Imagine making critical business decisions based on data that isn't quite right. In the world of accounting, this isn't just a hypothetical scenario; it's a real challenge caused by what are known as 'information asymmetries.' This simply means that not everyone has the same access to the quality of information being reported. Think of it like trying to navigate with a map that's missing key landmarks—you might get lost, and so might your business strategy.

A study by Glover and Levine digs deep into this issue, particularly focusing on how these hidden asymmetries affect the reliability of financial reports. They shed light on how companies can be misled when they don't fully understand the quality of the measurements used in their accounting. This can lead to poor decision-making, especially when it comes to things like fair value accounting, where judgment plays a significant role.

This article aims to break down these complex ideas into easy-to-understand insights. We'll explore the core concepts of the Glover and Levine model, look at why understanding measurement quality is crucial, and discuss practical steps businesses can take to ensure their financial data is as transparent and reliable as possible.

Decoding Information Asymmetry: What It Means for Your Business

Distorted financial statement reflecting information asymmetry.

At its heart, information asymmetry in accounting refers to a situation where some people within a company (like managers) have more information about the quality of financial measurements than others (like investors or stakeholders). This imbalance can create problems because those with less information might misinterpret financial reports or make decisions based on flawed data. For example, if a company uses 'fair value accounting'—where assets are valued based on market prices—but doesn't fully disclose how those values were determined, stakeholders might not realize that those values are based on a lot of guesswork and are potentially unreliable.

Glover and Levine's research highlights that this asymmetry can undermine the very purpose of accounting, which is to provide a clear and accurate picture of a company's financial health. When information is skewed, it reduces the 'stewardship usefulness' of financial reports, meaning they become less effective at guiding business strategy and holding management accountable.

To illustrate this, consider these key issues identified in the research:

Reduced Usefulness: Financial reports become less reliable when there's a lack of clarity about how measurements were made.
Impact on Incentives: Asymmetry can skew incentive structures, as rewards might be based on inaccurate or incomplete data.
Fair Value Concerns: Fair value accounting, which requires significant judgment, is particularly vulnerable to these asymmetries.

The study suggests that companies should strive for greater transparency in their accounting practices. This means not only providing the numbers but also explaining how those numbers were arrived at, especially when judgment is involved. By doing so, companies can reduce information asymmetry and improve the trustworthiness of their financial reports.

Taking Action: Steps Toward Transparent Accounting

The insights from Glover and Levine's study offer a clear call to action: businesses need to prioritize transparency and disclosure in their accounting practices. By addressing information asymmetries head-on, companies can foster greater trust among stakeholders, make more informed decisions, and ultimately build a stronger, more sustainable financial foundation. It’s about ensuring that everyone has access to the same high-quality information, leveling the playing field for better business outcomes.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What is 'information asymmetry' in the context of accounting, and why is it a problem?

In accounting, 'information asymmetry' refers to the situation where some individuals within a company, such as managers, possess more detailed insights into the quality of financial measurements than external parties like investors or stakeholders. This creates an imbalance because those with less information may misinterpret financial reports, leading to flawed decisions. This skewed understanding reduces the 'stewardship usefulness' of these reports, impacting the ability to effectively guide business strategy and ensure management accountability. The research by Glover and Levine underscores the significance of this issue, highlighting its potential to undermine the clarity and accuracy that accounting aims to provide.

How does the Glover and Levine model shed light on issues within accounting practices?

The Glover and Levine model specifically addresses how hidden asymmetries impact the reliability of financial reports. Their study highlights that companies can be misled when there is a lack of full understanding of the quality of the measurements used in their accounting. This is especially critical in areas like 'fair value accounting,' where significant judgment is involved. Without a clear understanding of how values are determined, stakeholders might perceive a level of reliability that isn't truly there. The model suggests that greater transparency is needed in accounting practices, especially around judgmental figures.

What are some key issues identified by Glover and Levine's research related to information asymmetry?

Glover and Levine's research highlights three key issues: reduced usefulness of financial reports due to a lack of clarity in measurements, skewed incentive structures arising from inaccurate or incomplete data, and fair value concerns given its vulnerability to these asymmetries. When financial reports lack clarity, their reliability diminishes. Inaccurate data can skew incentive structures, leading to misaligned rewards. Furthermore, 'fair value accounting', which depends heavily on judgment, is particularly susceptible to these asymmetries. To mitigate these issues, Glover and Levine suggest that companies should be more transparent, especially when substantial judgment influences the numbers.

How can businesses take action to address information asymmetries and improve transparency in their accounting practices?

Businesses need to prioritize transparency and disclosure in their accounting practices. This involves providing not only the numbers but also a clear explanation of how those numbers were derived, particularly when subjective judgment is involved, as often seen in 'fair value accounting'. By proactively addressing information asymmetries, companies can foster greater trust among stakeholders, facilitate more informed decision-making, and create a more robust and sustainable financial foundation. This ensures everyone has access to the same high-quality information.

What is 'fair value accounting,' and why is it particularly vulnerable to information asymmetry?

'Fair value accounting' is a method where assets are valued based on their market prices. It's particularly vulnerable to information asymmetry because the determination of these fair values often involves significant judgment and estimation. If a company doesn't fully disclose the methods and assumptions used to arrive at these values, stakeholders might not realize the extent of the guesswork involved and could overestimate the reliability of the reported figures. Glover and Levine's research emphasizes the need for greater transparency in 'fair value accounting' to mitigate these risks and provide a more accurate picture of a company's financial health. Without it, the 'stewardship usefulness' of financial reports will be undermined.