Illustration of Sparsentan clearing pathways in a kidney for FSGS treatment.

A New Hope for FSGS: Can Sparsentan Offer Better Results?

"DUET Study Reveals Promising Results for Sparsentan in Treating Primary FSGS, Offering a Potential Breakthrough for Patients."


Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a challenging kidney disease characterized by scarring in the kidney's filtering units. This scarring leads to proteinuria, where protein leaks into the urine, and can eventually lead to kidney failure. Primary FSGS, in particular, has no identifiable cause, making it difficult to treat effectively. Current treatments often involve managing symptoms and slowing disease progression.

Traditional treatments for primary FSGS include corticosteroids and other immune-modulating agents, often combined with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs). However, these treatments can have significant side effects, leaving many patients with an unmet need for more effective and well-tolerated options. This is why researchers are constantly seeking new therapies to combat FSGS and protect kidney function.

The DUET study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sparsentan, a dual endothelin type A (ETA) and angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, compared to irbesartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, in patients with primary FSGS. Sparsentan's dual-action approach targets two pathways involved in kidney damage, potentially offering a more comprehensive treatment strategy.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

FSGS Treatment and Sparsentan’s Dual Target

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a kidney lesion with varied causes and substantial unmet need for safe, effective treatments. Sparsentan is being studied because it targets endothelin-1 and angiotensin II pathways that contribute to kidney-function loss. In the 8-week, randomized, double-blind DUET study, sparsentan reduced urinary protein more than irbesartan, a blood-pressure medicine commonly used for FSGS. A later review describes the challenge of applying the FDA’s proteinuria-based indication to different FSGS phenotypes in clinical practice.

A First Disease-Specific FDA Milestone

On April 13, 2026, the FDA approved sparsentan (Filspari) for adults and children aged 8 years and older with FSGS without nephrotic syndrome, according to Medaptly. A September 2026 Kidney News commentary describes the approval as the first targeted therapy for FSGS to move beyond conventional renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition. The milestone marks a new treatment option, while the commentary also notes that it brings unresolved questions alongside promise.

Sparsentan's Dual Action: A More Effective Approach to Reducing Proteinuria?

Illustration of Sparsentan clearing pathways in a kidney for FSGS treatment.

The DUET study was a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial. This means patients were randomly assigned to receive either sparsentan or irbesartan, and neither the patients nor the researchers knew which treatment each patient was receiving until the study was completed. This design helps to minimize bias and ensure the results are reliable.

Researchers enrolled 109 patients aged 8-75 years with biopsy-proven FSGS and a certain level of protein in their urine. Participants received either sparsentan (200, 400, or 800 mg/day) or irbesartan (300 mg/day) for 8 weeks, followed by an open-label period where all patients received sparsentan. The primary goal was to measure the reduction in proteinuria (UP/C ratio) at week 8.

  • Greater Proteinuria Reduction: Patients treated with sparsentan experienced a significantly greater reduction in proteinuria compared to those treated with irbesartan.
  • FSGS Partial Remission: A higher proportion of sparsentan-treated patients achieved FSGS partial remission, meaning their proteinuria levels decreased significantly.
  • Blood Pressure Control: Sparsentan effectively reduced blood pressure, while irbesartan did not demonstrate the same effect.
  • Stable Kidney Function: Both treatments maintained stable kidney function (eGFR), indicating they did not negatively impact kidney health.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Evidence Base Across Four Studies

A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis included four studies in its quantitative and qualitative synthesis: Trachtman 2018, Rheault 2023, Heerspink 2023, and Rovin 2023. A 2022 review notes that sparsentan was evaluated in DUET, a phase 2, double-blinded, active-control trial in FSGS. A 2026 review describes the study population as 109 patients aged 8–75 years with presumed primary, genetic, and possibly secondary FSGS lesions, eGFR above 30 mL/min/1.73 m², and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio of at least 1.0 g/g.

Limits of DUET Evidence

The DUET study enrolled relatively few patients in each dose cohort, limiting its ability to detect significant differences in antiproteinuric effect between individual dose groups. Its FSGS population was heterogeneous, including immunologically mediated and genetic disease and varying degrees of interstitial fibrosis. The long-term post hoc analysis also has potential selection bias: patients who chose to remain in the study may have been those who responded well to sparsentan.

Proteinuria Reduction and Kidney-Function Outcomes

The phase 2 DUET trial found that sparsentan reduced proteinuria compared with irbesartan over eight weeks. In the phase 3 DUPLEX trial, sparsentan was compared with the maximum labeled dose of irbesartan, and the supplied pediatric report describes rapid and sustained proteinuria reductions with sparsentan. However, a March 2024 letter reports no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate slope over 108 weeks in the comparison it discusses. These findings distinguish proteinuria reduction from evidence of a difference in eGFR slope.

The study also found that sparsentan was generally safe and well-tolerated. While some patients experienced hypotension and edema, these side effects did not lead to study withdrawals. Overall, the adverse event profile was similar between the two treatment groups.

Looking Ahead: Sparsentan's Potential and Future Research

The DUET study provides compelling evidence that sparsentan may offer a more effective treatment option for patients with primary FSGS. Its dual-action mechanism, targeting both endothelin and angiotensin II receptors, appears to be more effective at reducing proteinuria than traditional RASI therapy alone.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Why Dual Pathway Targeting Matters

Sparsentan acts on both endothelin and angiotensin pathways. A 2024 Kidney Medicine article presents this dual mechanism as a reason the drug could reduce proteinuria more effectively than single-agent RAAS inhibitors or endothelin A receptor antagonists alone. The source frames this as potential enhanced efficacy, rather than establishing that advantage as a settled outcome.

While these results are promising, it's important to remember that this was a Phase 2 study. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger, longer-term trials. The ongoing open-label treatment period of the DUET study and the Phase 3 DUPLEX study will provide valuable insights into the long-term effects of sparsentan on kidney function and overall patient outcomes.

If future studies confirm sparsentan's efficacy and safety, it could represent a significant advance in the management of FSGS, offering patients a new hope for preserving kidney function and improving their quality of life.

What keeps the DUET result from being settled

  • The trial had limited representation of Black participants, restricting what its results can show for that subgroup.[1]

DUET at a glance

Study designRandomised or controlled trial[1]
PopulationPatients aged 8–75 years with biopsy-proven FSGS, eGFR>30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2, and UP/C ≥1.0 g/g[1]
Sample size109 patients randomized; 96 received study drugs and had baseline and week 8 UP/C measurements[1]
Duration8 weeks[1]
ComparisonIrbesartan (300 mg/d)[1]
Main outcomeReduction from baseline in UP/C[1]
Effect sizeUP/C reductions were 45% versus 19% for all pooled doses; 47% versus 19% for pooled 400 and 800 mg doses; FPRE achieved in 28% versus 9%[1]
p-valueP =0.006; P =0.01; P =0.04[1]
Times cited186[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1681/asn.2018010091, Alternate LINK

Title: Duet: A Phase 2 Study Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of Sparsentan In Patients With Fsgs

Subject: Nephrology

Journal: Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Publisher: American Society of Nephrology (ASN)

Authors: Howard Trachtman, Peter Nelson, Sharon Adler, Kirk N. Campbell, Abanti Chaudhuri, Vimal Kumar Derebail, Giovanni Gambaro, Loreto Gesualdo, Debbie S. Gipson, Jonathan Hogan, Kenneth Lieberman, Brad Marder, Kevin Edward Meyers, Esmat Mustafa, Jai Radhakrishnan, Tarak Srivastava, Miganush Stepanians, Vladimír Tesar, Olga Zhdanova, Radko Komers

Published: 2018-10-25

Everything You Need To Know

1

What exactly is Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and why is it such a concern?

Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a kidney disease characterized by scarring in the kidney's filtering units, leading to proteinuria and potentially kidney failure. This disease has no identifiable cause making it difficult to treat effectively. Its significance lies in the damage it inflicts on the kidneys, impairing their ability to filter blood and remove waste products. This can lead to a decline in kidney function and potentially end-stage renal disease, necessitating dialysis or a kidney transplant.

2

What was the DUET study about and what were the key findings?

The DUET study compared the effectiveness of sparsentan to irbesartan in treating Primary FSGS. Sparsentan, a dual endothelin type A (ETA) and angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, was compared to irbesartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist. The trial design was a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial. The importance of the study is providing evidence that sparsentan may offer a more effective treatment option. The implications are that it provides a potential breakthrough for patients, offering the possibility of a more comprehensive and effective approach to managing the disease.

3

What is sparsentan, and why is its dual-action mechanism important?

Sparsentan is a dual endothelin type A (ETA) and angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist. This dual-action targets two pathways involved in kidney damage, potentially offering a more comprehensive treatment strategy than single-target approaches. The significance is that it tackles FSGS from multiple angles, potentially leading to better results in terms of reducing proteinuria and slowing disease progression. This approach suggests that Sparsentan may offer a more effective treatment compared to traditional single-target therapies.

4

How did sparsentan compare to irbesartan in terms of reducing proteinuria and achieving remission?

In the DUET study, patients treated with sparsentan experienced a significantly greater reduction in proteinuria compared to those treated with irbesartan. Additionally, a higher proportion of patients achieved FSGS partial remission, which means their proteinuria levels decreased significantly. The findings indicate that sparsentan is more effective than irbesartan in controlling the disease. This is crucial because reduced proteinuria is a key goal in managing FSGS, as it indicates a slowdown in the progression of kidney damage. The implications suggest an improved prognosis for individuals receiving Sparsentan.

5

What were the safety and tolerability results of sparsentan in the DUET study, and what does that mean for patients?

The DUET study found that both sparsentan and irbesartan maintained stable kidney function (eGFR). This means that both treatments did not negatively impact kidney health. Sparsentan was generally safe and well-tolerated in the study. While some patients experienced side effects like hypotension and edema, these did not lead to study withdrawals. This demonstrates that sparsentan does not seem to negatively affect kidney function while providing other benefits. This is very important as it means that the treatment is unlikely to worsen the kidney disease. The implications of both of these mean that sparsentan is a promising candidate for the treatment of Primary FSGS.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.