Elderly patient surrounded by medical symbols, representing healthcare decisions.

90 and Facing Emergency Surgery? What You Need to Know About Survival Rates

"A groundbreaking Italian study sheds light on the outcomes of emergency abdominal surgery in nonagenarians, challenging assumptions and offering crucial insights for families and healthcare providers."


As life expectancy increases, more individuals are living well into their 90s. This demographic shift brings new challenges to emergency medicine, particularly when older adults require urgent surgical interventions. Unlike elective surgeries, which allow for careful planning and risk mitigation, emergency procedures often involve immediate, life-threatening situations that demand swift action.

Emergency abdominal surgery in nonagenarians (people aged 90 and older) is a complex field with limited research. While there's extensive data on cardiac and other elective surgeries in the elderly, information on emergency abdominal procedures in this age group remains scarce. Available data suggests that about 50% of patients survive one year post-operation, highlighting the critical need for more comprehensive studies.

To address this gap, an Italian multicenter retrospective study was conducted to determine the two-year survival rate after emergency abdominal surgery in nonagenarians. The study also aimed to identify any demographic or surgical parameters that could predict poor outcomes, providing valuable insights for healthcare providers and families facing these difficult decisions.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Growing Emergency Surgery Burden

The number of elderly patients, especially those aged 80 and older, undergoing emergency surgery is increasing, according to a nine-year study at an emergency medical center in South Korea. A 2025 review reports that elderly patients constitute more than 30% of emergency general surgery cases. It also reports that emergency general surgery carries fivefold higher mortality and triple the complication rates of elective procedures. These patients present specific challenges that require attention to improve morbidity and mortality.

Tailored Care With Limited Evidence

Evidence-based principles and expert recommendations emphasize effective preoperative and postoperative care for older adults undergoing emergency surgery. Emergency general surgery in geriatric patients requires a tailored approach to improve outcomes and avoid unnecessary care. However, evidence for perioperative care of older adults remains limited, and guidelines generally perform better for elective than emergency surgery. The Elder-Friendly Approaches to the Surgical Environment model was developed and assessed in a nonrandomized controlled trial involving patients aged 65 years or older undergoing emergency surgery.

Building the Evidence Base

The American College of Surgeons History and Archives Committee created an educational resource to introduce medical students and residents to important milestones that have shaped surgery. Research specifically focused on elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery has historically been limited. A retrospective study reported that increasing age, a worsening American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and plasma albumin below 30 g/litre were associated with worse postoperative outcomes in elderly patients. The study also noted limitations in using these factors to predict outcomes.

What the Research Revealed About Emergency Surgery Survival

Elderly patient surrounded by medical symbols, representing healthcare decisions.

The study, a retrospective multicenter trial, included patients aged 90 years or older who underwent urgent abdominal surgery. Data was collected from six Italian hospitals, focusing on various factors, including gender, age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score, comorbidities, diagnosis, time to surgery, surgical procedures, anesthesia type, and hospital length of stay. Survival rates were assessed through phone call follow-ups, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival.

The research identified 72 nonagenarian patients (20 males and 52 females) who underwent emergency abdominal surgery. The average age was 92.5 years, with an ASA score of 3.32, indicating significant pre-existing health issues. Key findings include:

  • High Mortality Rate: The in-hospital mortality rate was 23%, indicating a significant risk associated with emergency abdominal surgery in this age group.
  • Low Two-Year Survival Rate: The two-year survival rate was only 23%, underscoring the long-term challenges faced by these patients. The mean follow-up time was 10 months (ranging from 1-27 months).
  • ASA Score as a Predictor: Among all the parameters analyzed, only the ASA score was significantly correlated with survival. This suggests that the overall health status and pre-existing conditions play a crucial role in determining outcomes.
  • Comorbidities and Malignancy: The presence of malignancy or the absence of comorbidities did not significantly correlate with survival, challenging some common assumptions about risk factors.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Research in Patients Over 90

An Italian multicenter retrospective study examined abdominal emergency surgery in patients over 90 years old. The study was authored by Tarasconi, Catena, Abongwa, De Simone, Coccolini, Ansaloni, Roveran, Agresta, Mele, Di Saverio, Vettoretto, Collura, Baiocchi, Portolani, Sartelli, Heyer, and Biondi. It was published in 2016 in the Journal of Peritoneum and Other Serosal Surfaces. Its title directly addresses whether abdominal emergency surgery is worthwhile in this age group.

Emergency Care Versus Elective Evidence

An aging population and advances in surgery have increased the need for geriatric management in emergency general surgical care. Evidence suggests that integrating a proactive geriatric service may improve traditionally measured hospital and patient-based outcomes. However, existing evidence-based perioperative guidelines perform better for elective surgery than for emergency surgery. As a result, decisions for older adults undergoing emergency surgery may be challenging and may rely on clinicians' subjective experience.

These findings suggest that nonagenarian patients undergoing emergent abdominal surgical procedures face a high risk of in-hospital mortality and a low two-year survival rate. The ASA score is a critical factor in predicting outcomes, but other factors do not appear to significantly influence survival rates. This underscores the need for careful evaluation and realistic expectations when considering emergency abdominal surgery in frail, elderly patients.

Making Informed Decisions for Elderly Patients

The study highlights the importance of carefully evaluating the risks and benefits of emergency abdominal surgery in patients over 90. Given the high mortality rate and low two-year survival rate, healthcare providers and families must have realistic expectations and consider the patient's overall health status when making treatment decisions. While emergency surgery can be life-saving, it is essential to weigh the potential outcomes and quality of life for these frail patients.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Value of Geriatric Comanagement

The role of a geriatrician in emergency surgery for an older adult may vary according to the acuity of the presentation. The cited 2022 guidance strongly recommends perioperative consultation and comanagement. These measures are intended to optimize care delivery and patient outcomes. The recommendation reflects the need to incorporate geriatric expertise into emergency surgical care when appropriate.

Recovery Beyond the Operation

Even when emergency surgery is successful, long-term functional decline and increased dependency are common among elderly patients. Reviews of emergency surgery in the elderly describe specific challenges in caring for this vulnerable group. One review summarizes 20 years of reports from medical bodies that sought to improve care. Both sources emphasize the need for more research and for multiple improvements to reduce morbidity and mortality.

How much this Italian study can establish

Observational study (level 4 of 8)

The findings come from a defined group of nonagenarians who underwent emergency abdominal surgery; they do not by themselves establish outcomes for other age groups or for patients who did not undergo surgery.[1]

Emergency abdominal surgery in nonagenarians: a retrospective Italian multicenter study

Study designObservational study[1]
PopulationNonagenarian patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery[1]
Sample size72[1]
Setting6 Italian hospitals (Parma, Bergamo, Bologna, Brescia, Chiari, Adria)[1]
Main outcomeSurvival rate two years after emergency abdominal surgery[1]
Effect size2 years survival rate was 23%[1]
Times cited0[1]

How this study fits the limited evidence base

The paper places its question in a field with less published work on emergency abdominal surgery in very old patients than on some other surgical fields, including cardiac surgery.[1]

Its stated purpose was to measure survival after surgery and examine whether demographic or surgical characteristics could help identify poor outcomes.[1]

The study included patients treated at hospitals in Parma, Bergamo, Bologna, Brescia, Chiari, and Adria, giving its findings a multicenter Italian setting.[1]

Questions left open by the study

  • How would outcomes compare with those of similar patients who did not undergo emergency abdominal surgery?[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.4081/joper.2016.1, Alternate LINK

Title: Abdominal Emergency Surgery In Patients Over 90 Years Old: Is It Worthwhile? An Italian Multicenter Retrospective Study

Subject: Cell Biology

Journal: Journal of Peritoneum (and other serosal surfaces)

Publisher: PAGEPress Publications

Authors: Antonio Tarasconi, Fausto Catena, Hariscine K. Abongwa, Belinda De Simone, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Antonietta Roveran, Ferdinando Agresta, Marcella Mele, Salomone Di Saverio, Nereo Vettoretto, Simone Collura, Gianluca Baiocchi, Nazario Portolani, Massimo Sartelli, Arianna Heyer, Antonio Biondi

Published: 2016-07-04

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the in-hospital mortality rate for nonagenarians undergoing emergency abdominal surgery?

The in-hospital mortality rate was 23%, indicating a significant risk associated with emergency abdominal surgery for nonagenarians. This means that of the patients who underwent the procedure, nearly a quarter did not survive the hospital stay. This is a crucial piece of information because it emphasizes the immediate danger involved in this type of surgery for individuals aged 90 and older. It highlights the immediate risk and the urgency of making informed decisions.

2

What are the long-term survival rates following emergency abdominal surgery for patients over 90?

The two-year survival rate was only 23%. This signifies that out of the nonagenarian patients who survived the initial surgery and hospital stay, only about a quarter were still alive two years later. The mean follow-up time was 10 months, ranging from 1-27 months. This low survival rate underscores the long-term challenges faced by these patients. This is important because it illustrates the overall poor prognosis for this demographic and emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding of the situation.

3

What factors were found to be predictors of survival in this study?

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was significantly correlated with survival. This suggests that the overall health status and pre-existing conditions play a crucial role in determining outcomes. This means that patients with higher ASA scores, indicating more severe pre-existing health issues, were less likely to survive. The ASA score, which assesses the patient's overall health, is a key predictor in this context. This is very significant because it provides a quantifiable measure to assess a patient's risk and aids in decision-making.

4

What did the study reveal about the impact of specific conditions, like cancer, on survival rates?

The study found that the presence of malignancy or the absence of comorbidities did not significantly correlate with survival, challenging some common assumptions about risk factors. This means that while these factors might seem like predictors of survival, in this specific study, they did not have a statistically significant impact on whether a patient lived or died. This is important because it suggests that the focus should be more on the ASA score and overall health status rather than on specific conditions like cancer or the number of pre-existing health problems. It challenges established beliefs about risk.

5

What are the key considerations for making decisions about emergency abdominal surgery for elderly patients?

When considering emergency abdominal surgery for nonagenarians, healthcare providers and families must have realistic expectations and consider the patient's overall health status when making treatment decisions. Given the high mortality rate and low two-year survival rate, it is essential to weigh the potential outcomes and quality of life for these frail patients. While emergency surgery can be life-saving, it is crucial to assess the patient's ASA score and pre-existing conditions, as these play a significant role in their survival. The implications include the need for careful evaluation of risks and benefits and an honest discussion of the patient's potential quality of life post-surgery.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.